Reviews tagging 'Ableism'
The Phantom of the Opera (AmazonClassics Edition), by Gaston Leroux, Tim Campbell
2 reviews
maeverose's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.0
Whelp. That sure was a book.
My rating is mostly for the unintentional comedy of how ridiculous the book is. I know some parts are supposed to be funny but I think I was laughing at the wrong parts. I also just love the idea of some guy secretly living in an opera house and messing with people. Sadly though I was bored most of the time while reading this. I liked Raoul and Christine well enough (though they were both extremely naive), Erik was very different than I thought he would be (I didn’t know anything about his backstory and I had no idea he’d be so talkative and weird. I thought he’d be more brooding lol). I found it hard to imagine the descriptions of the opera house, especially when they went underground, though that’s likely a fault of the translation.
Speaking of the translation, I don’t know if my edition (paper mill press) is just a bad edition but there were quite a few typos and a lot of things were worded awkwardly, and I don’t think it was just the writing style, it seemed like a bad translation. Maybe I’ll have to do some research and see if there’s a better one.
I really wanted to like this but I think I might just not get along with classics that well. Every time I read a classic I feel like I would like it better if it had been written today. Same time period, story and characters, just a more modern writing style (and less misogyny, racism and ableism… although this story relies so heavily on the ableism I’m not sure how you’d write it without it…). I don’t mind the old language so much but I don’t like the overly dramatic repetitive dialogue that classics often have (this one had a lot of that). I don’t like how repetitive in general classics tend to be. Which is sad because I want to like classics. The stories themselves are sometimes interesting but then the writing and dialogue ruin it for me :/
Also, I can’t imagine a room of mirrors being that convincing that you’d have to have prior knowledge of what it is to know it’s not actually a forest. YOU’D SEE YOUR OWN REFLECTION. COME ON.
I think this is probably much better experienced via the actual musical rather than the book. I’ve never seen the musical but now I want to.
My rating is mostly for the unintentional comedy of how ridiculous the book is. I know some parts are supposed to be funny but I think I was laughing at the wrong parts. I also just love the idea of some guy secretly living in an opera house and messing with people. Sadly though I was bored most of the time while reading this. I liked Raoul and Christine well enough (though they were both extremely naive), Erik was very different than I thought he would be (I didn’t know anything about his backstory and I had no idea he’d be so talkative and weird. I thought he’d be more brooding lol). I found it hard to imagine the descriptions of the opera house, especially when they went underground, though that’s likely a fault of the translation.
Speaking of the translation, I don’t know if my edition (paper mill press) is just a bad edition but there were quite a few typos and a lot of things were worded awkwardly, and I don’t think it was just the writing style, it seemed like a bad translation. Maybe I’ll have to do some research and see if there’s a better one.
I really wanted to like this but I think I might just not get along with classics that well. Every time I read a classic I feel like I would like it better if it had been written today. Same time period, story and characters, just a more modern writing style (and less misogyny, racism and ableism… although this story relies so heavily on the ableism I’m not sure how you’d write it without it…). I don’t mind the old language so much but I don’t like the overly dramatic repetitive dialogue that classics often have (this one had a lot of that). I don’t like how repetitive in general classics tend to be. Which is sad because I want to like classics. The stories themselves are sometimes interesting but then the writing and dialogue ruin it for me :/
Spoiler
That ending though… Erik really went to all that trouble… just to break down over a forehead kiss and decide to let Christine marry Raoul after all. THEN DIE. OVER SAID KISS. Dude..Also, I can’t imagine a room of mirrors being that convincing that you’d have to have prior knowledge of what it is to know it’s not actually a forest. YOU’D SEE YOUR OWN REFLECTION. COME ON.
I think this is probably much better experienced via the actual musical rather than the book. I’ve never seen the musical but now I want to.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body shaming, Confinement, Ableism, Emotional abuse, Kidnapping, Toxic relationship, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Animal death, Misogyny, Death, Torture, Murder, Racial slurs, and Racism
Minor: Xenophobia and Fatphobia
incel behavior, controlling behavior, manipulationmonicalaurette's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
“It is a matter of life and death. And now, silence and follow me!”
So, The Phantom of the Opera is my favorite musical. I watched it for the first time in middle school choir and fell in love with the music and the story. I forced my family to watch it with me and I got a copy of the 2004 movie for Christmas the next year.
Now, I knew going into this book that it was going to be vastly different from the musical. I knew that, I really did. However, for some strange reason I was still so shocked at all the differences between this book and the musical. But I did love seeing scenes from the book that inspired specific scenes in the musical and playing the music in the background helped as well. I would HIGHLY recommend listening to the music scores of The Phantom of the Opera while reading this book because it made the experience so much better for me.
“He asked only to be “someone”, like everyone else.”
The way that this book was written had me constantly having to remind myself that it was a work of fiction, because the small pieces of ‘historical’ items really made it seem like this happened and I almost googled some of the events and people. *hides face in hands* I feel that the author really did a good job at making a book that didn’t feel like fiction while also being such an elaborate and crazy story.
I give The Phantom of the Opera 4 stars. I’m not taking away points for it not being like what I’m used to. I’m taking away some points because I just...didn’t like Raoul in the beginning, and still wasn’t his biggest fan at the end. Sometimes the things that he said or the things he did took away from me enjoying it. But other than that, a really fun read. I’m going to go and watch my movie again now!
“He had a heart that could have held the world; and, in the end, had to content himself with a cellar.”
Spoiler
I forgot that the phantom’s name is Erik lmaoSpoiler
I was sad that Meg and Mme. Giry didn’t have as big of a role in this version of the story, having the ‘Hand at the level of your eye’ scene be with the Persian and not Mme. Giry, and not having Meg and Christine be friends.Spoiler
That being said, I did like the Persian. I thought he was a fun character to incorporate.Spoiler
Yeah Erik, you had a tough childhood...still not a great excuse to kill and kidnap people my guy!Spoiler
Gets a kiss from a woman and then dies, ME AS WELL ERIK, ME AS WELL!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death and Suicide
Moderate: Ableism, Emotional abuse, Kidnapping, and Murder
Minor: Death of parent and Torture
More...