Reviews tagging 'Sexual harassment'

The Virgin Suicides by Jeffrey Eugenides

10 reviews

miraveta's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Interesting to read a story where the narrators are so blatantly wrong about what's actually going on. They've placed themselves near the heart of a narrative they built up that in reality has little to do with them or anything larger than life, but rather the various everyday social pressures of the panopticon that is WASP suburban life.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

meowcoric's review against another edition

Go to review page


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lexigrce's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

this book is just so tragic, the irony of telling a whole story encapsulating these girls’ lives when they truly didn’t know them at all. i remember first watching the movie when i was maybe 16 or 17 and writing it off. but when i rewatched it a year ago, despite being even further from the sisters’ ages than i originally was, i actually understood. reading the book somehow feels more real, seeing the story as it is without the added glitz of familiar celebrity faces, a bunch of made up stories constructed so that the boys could feel interesting and connected to the girls, as if they could even for a second understand what it felt like to be them.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mgoodrick's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cassbarker's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jenny_librarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective slow-paced
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

2.5

This is a book about the patriarchal tendency of dehumanizing women. Which should be enough to tell you why I didn’t like it at all.

The writing itself is good, but that’s about the only redeeming quality to this book. The rest is just men being… well, men. I get what the author wanted to achieve with this, but why it needed to be written in this way is beyond me.

I keep hoping the next “classic” I read is going to be better, and I keep being disappointed because those “classics” were written by allocishet white men in a time women were seen as little more than property.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chaoticweevil's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

romyomola's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

unsure whether the unreliability of the narrator is intentional. I read it as an exploration of the projections society puts on young women and how they crush us, but it could equally be read as a titillating perverted description of deeply disturbed young girls. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

igmartinez's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

devourfiction's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

 I have such conflicting feelings on this one.

Can Jeffrey Eugenides write? Yes. Are his metaphors solid, shocking, haunting? Yes, yes, yes. Is this book full of ambition? Yes. Did I enjoy it? ...

As I read I couldn't help but think to myself: what is the point of treating the subject of girls' suicide and sexuality in this way? In this book, neighbourhood boys narrate their obsession with this group of girls only to find out they were unknowable, with this knowledge spurring their growth into men. Hold on, isn't this the manic pixie dream girl again? No, surely there is more to this - the writing seems so profound. Perhaps this book's racism and ableism (with Joe the R*****), praise of statutory rape as long as it happens to a boy (Trip, anyone?), and especially its constant objectification of underage girls is more than just that - maybe they are an attempt to reveal the insidiousness of the male gaze rather than promote it (the way Nabokov's Lolita had tried to with pedophilia)?

More and more red flags appeared. I didn't want to be a lazy reader, or one who wants to make certain subjects taboo for literature. As in the case of Lolita, I stand by the fact that literature can powerfully depict immoral actions. But in this case, to what end? My inability to read the novel charitably won over at a prolonged and graphic scene of one of the boys kissing one of the girls without her consent while not wanting to actually speak with her. There, I thought, is a clear statement of the grossness of these boys' treatment of girls. Except boom! The girl actually turned out to have liked it, forms a connection with him and wants to continue the relationship. Huh? So the point is that actually it's all good now, and you can just do whatever you want because you can't ever actually get into these girls' heads anyway? There is a thin line between depicting a perspective and supporting it, and I don't think Eugenides walked it well. Over the book, few of the boys' perceptions came under any kind of resistance. In a world full of the sexualisation and objectification of girls, where does that leave us?

I had a lot of hopes for this book. I was intrigued by the ambition of using solely outside male perspectives. I was hooked by the concept, in what it could reveal about sexual relationships and mental health. I was mesmerised by the skill of Eugenides's prose. But ultimately, it came down to this: either this book is full-on promoting rape culture and the like, or its 4D chess game is so complex that it is obscuring its own point and promoting rape culture anyway. And I just can't vibe with that, not even for literature's sake. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...