Reviews tagging 'Rape'

House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

89 reviews

wizardhugs's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

i loved the experience of reading this book. not just the infamous bizarre page layouts, but the psuedo-academic analysis of this nonexistant house is a blast. this book is not for everyone, however i cannot help but use this book as a litmus test for who i can and cannot truly vibe with.

as for the actual plot and content, i thoroughly enjoyed what was going on, and watching the personal struggles of these characters unfold, reflected in their work. i have a lot of analysis and digging to do aftet reading, but i highly recommend house of leaves -- there is no wrong way to read it. i cannot stop talking about it either.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rainyreadss's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

part academic retelling of a maybe real, maybe fictional film and part epistolary reckoning and wrecking of an extremely late to the party witness. an unusual and unnerving reading experience. silence leaks through every crack. darkness darker than any dark you’ve ever known leaks into every moment. over 600 pages of disaster, heartache, urgency, and ruin. this book definitely isn’t for everyone but it’s worth at least skimming through to see all the different ways form breaks down and rebuilds throughout the narrative. a truly original experience

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bites_of_books's review

Go to review page

challenging dark informative mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

The amount of effort and work that went into House of Leaves is something that I can really appreciate. There were certain sections where the creepiness of the darkness inside the house was truly palpable but anytime that I was close to diving deep into that horror, the academic style of writing took me away from it. At times I was also really interested in the academic discussions regarding subjects ranging from physics to history and linguistics, but it was truly difficult to call it an enjoyable experience. 
There are many interpretations about this book, ranging from who is narrating, the true meaning of the house, and even the timeline of events. 
I don't think I can recommend this book to anyone looking for a fun book to read, but if you're into deep dives into linguistics, philosophy, poetry, physics, with two side stories that tell the stories of deeply troubled characters. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chloebowie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

Well… it was good enough to keep turning the page but bad enough to where I couldn’t tell you what happened 😅 it was everything and nothing all at once. Nothing was ever really resolved. It’s just stopped. 

If this weren’t a buddy read I don’t think I would’ve finished it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

unfinishedduet's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mimbomombo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Alright then what a weird book to start my official big-boy-book reading journey off. Also, I read this as a pdf because I started it away from home, then it wasn't in my library or cheap enough to buy, so no upside down and sideways, or even coloured text unfortunately :(

I won't lie, this book tried my patience sometimes, Zampano waffles on and on about physics and various academic subjects and Johnny interrupts several times with the latest entry in how he's slept with every female he talks to for an hour or not using a full stop for a page and a half. That being said though, the fact that it is "Zampano and Jonny" writing the book and not Mark the actual author, I don't care as much and I'm not as offended. It all builds on understanding the characters more.

The book basically reads as an academic work with references and footnotes abound, as well as several ruminations on every part of the movie the book-within-a-book is about. It wasn't my favourite style of writing and the academic style was sometimes above my abilities, as well as the subjects it covered weren't that interesting to me at times. Sometimes I'd just skip a book paragraphs if I detected a huge waffle about something I didn't care to hear 3 different bodies opinions on.

Despite all that, I did enjoy the book enough to read it quite fast. the House story was fun, I'm glad it didn't have a concrete explanation but I do wish there was more craziness to it than I got, the biggest revelation was a window. I enjoyed following the family members and the story unraveling as I went. The knocking at the door was pretty damn crazy moment.

Jonny's story was interesting to see his deterioration and the glimpses of what it looked like from the outside. As I write this I feel like the story wasn't too satisfying, but there's clearly a deeper story to be found. I was very curious about how both these stories would end up.

That's what I'll say in general about the book, I expected it to be confusing and convoluted and it was, but still more engaging than the confusing and convoluted movies I've seen. I'm not too interested in finding out all the meaning of the stories, it's not really my taste of media to leave so much out, but I'll have a look. Just like the movies I've seen like this, it probably won't sway my opinion about the book. Though, I will admit, it does give you a lot to think about afterwards. I probably should have read it slower.

See:
  • What is the minotaur? what does the slashing, does it exist, does it relate to Zampano's story about the father of the minotaur loving the minotaur but having to hide it away (and how does that story relate to Jonny's vision of being lost on a ship)
  • Jonny and boats
  • House of Leaves appearing in the book as a book two times
  • Jonny writing the introduction of finding Zampano after already being insane for months and months
  • How did Zampano write a book about a movie he hasn't seen?
  • What did the house want? Is it God? Was it all psychologically influenced? Did it come from colonial America? It actually got Karen to rescue Will in the end, but killed others like Tom who had seemingly done no wrong.
  • Contrary evidence, did the actually book exist? How the does that make any sense?
  • What Jonny mean by "This is not for you"?
  • etc.

Also, the strange formatting of the text in the book was entertaining, but a bit gimmicky.

OH and JESUS the sex did not need to get that explicit, I preferred it when Jonny just wrote poetry for an entire page. Glad I'm not alone on that front.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

abandonedmegastructure's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

House of Leaves explores the very limits of what can be done with ink on paper.

A suspenseful tale of exploration into the unknown is enhanced with layers of symbolism, discussion, meta-discussion, and mythological allusions. The result is an enthralling novel, fundamentally mysterious yet deeply compelling, which invites its reader to join in the analytical discussions that take center stage from time to time. The book plays with page structure, footnotes, the fourth wall, text markup, and anything else you could imagine. It goes beyond having an unreliable narrator and straight-up invites us to question the narrator's existence; just another part of the fun it's having exploring the concept of writing (not writing - chronicling? depicting? recording? knowing?) itself. It touches on themes of cosmic horror, religion, mental illness, and the human subconscious, though if I had to pin down a single theme I'd say this is a book about absences first and foremost.

I realize I might be making this book sound like a pretentious tome that's more concerned with being clever than being readable. And to be fair, there are some pseudo-academic bits that go on for too long, and they're the reason I'm not giving this a 5/5. But the various narratives interwoven through the book are insanely well-written and evocative (not to mention disturbing), the main characters slowly reveal more of their fascinating yet flawed selves, and the references and metatextual elements add to their stories, rather than distracting from them. Even when viewed purely as a story, House of Leaves holds up extremely well; everything else is just a bonus.

A final thought: I've seen a lot of people call this a horror novel, and I get where they're coming from, but I found the text intriguing more than scary even at the most uncanny points. If you've been put off by the horror label, and would otherwise have considered reading the book, I encourage you to try it out anyway.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cuppachaii's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I don't even know what to say. This is my favourite book. It makes sense that it's becoming popular right now, since --despite coming out twenty years ago-- it blends all the current horror trends of lost media, liminal horror, analogue horror, and coded-lore-horror. I cannot recommend this enough for someone who wants to read a really difficult book and flip wildly between footnotes, indexes, and appendices to reveal some of the most subtle, creeping horror I've read. This is the only horror novel that's gotten me so scared it stopped me in my tracks, and it did it several times. The way it accomplishes this is by getting under your skin and slowly worming its way into your psyche so it can rearrange itself (ha) without you noticing. This book was good enough that my illiterate ass pushed through and read a paper copy (which you must do). 

If you like books that get you obsessed, scouring forums, and uncovering secrets: read this. I cannot suggest it highly enough. It's impossible to describe the plot in less than a paragraph, which is the point. This is the kind of book you want to discuss with other fans as you make a spiderweb of twine on a corkboard. If you like subtle horror and interesting writing, read this. Do not miss this book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lookleft's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

What a mesmerising book. Truly special and haunting. A horror story and a love story, separate and together. I love the way it plays with the look of the text and uses that to create atmosphere and tension.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

at806's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings