zydecovivo's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective tense slow-paced

3.0

I learned about Malcolm Gladwell through his podcast, Revisionist History. Because of that, I prefer to listen to his books. This one in particular includes interviews, music, and recreated court scenes that I find helpful for keeping my attention. If you are coming into this blind, Gladwell has a way of writing and speaking that is very matter-of-fact and blunt. He intertwines history with personal interviews and studies to illustrate his points, which are usually out of the box or defy convention. He writes as if his answer is the correct, obvious, and logical conclusion. So if you disagree with his assessment of a situation, I can understand why it would be upsetting. This particular book covers some darker topics, such as police brutality, sexual assault, and suicide, and Gladwell’s characteristic tone doesn’t quite bring the empathy I think is needed to approach them. However, he does raise interesting points and provides new ways of thinking about how we communicate, how we trust or distrust, and how we think about others. The overall ideas are interesting and worth talking about, but if you are not in the right headspace to face some graphic descriptions of assault, put this off for a little while. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

claire2024's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

3.5

i think some of the passages surrounding the second chapter could have been done more carefully as they felt somewhat victim-blamy

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sidekicksam's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.25

A re-read of a book I read back in 2020, after the pandemic caused both a lot of isolation and division. People were literally keeping their distance, interacting less with strangers, but the summer of '20 also had some very painful revelations and awakenings for the race and equality discussions. 

Reading it again, I feel refreshed in the theories he outlines in the book. The 3 problems we have when encountering strangers (defaulting to the assumption that people can be trusted; thinking people's feelings always match their appearance and our inability to judge correctly whether someone is lying or the mismatch is happening; and that context is vital but also underappreciated) are a few that kept me curious, thinking and will stay with me in the back of my mind in encounters with strangers. Interesting food for thought and definitely contemplations that will stay with me. 

That being said, I am uneasy with some of the examples Gladwell decided to explore to prove his points. I already had some question marks during my re-read, but after reading multiple 1-star reviews (which have gained 1,000+ likes) on the first page, I'm seriously reconsidering whether this book is good enough to be read on its own (without the accompanying guide/reviews to also challenge the examples given). 

To use cases of rape and child molestation and trying to explain away the motives of witnesses or even instigators of the crimes is just... what? Why would you invalidate experiences of trauma instead of exploring the faulty assumptions on which we make errors (the cases of the Cuban spies in the CIA were much more compelling I think). 

Example: Brock Turner raping a passed out drunk girl on campus is explained away by their (mutual) excessive drinking and misinterpeted signals - I have never had to explain to any of my boyfriends that no means no (and that if I don't wake up or respond that is also a big fucking NO). 

Not taking the prejudice of race into consideration when discussing Sandra Bland's case, but explaining it away to miscommunication... especially with police brutality against Black people blowing up in the media in recent years, it's just harrowing.

I'm happy I don't just read books but also review them, because I may not have gotten further in my evaluation than 'whoo interesting material' without re-evaluating also the icky (and blatantly wrong) bits. 

Read it at your own volition, but do heed my warning. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

csnyder0018's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pagguini123's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

montyalmoro's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kelseyjameson's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

stories's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

Clear contention which was well signposted and scaffolded. Unfortunately said contention was also distasteful and built on astounding levels of rape apologist, ableism and an enduring belief that we should simply carry on stereotyping, just generously, as if the possibility of accounting for diversity were unfathomable. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kostkova_barca's review against another edition

Go to review page

0.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

missbsbookshelf's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative medium-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings