bluethor's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

He's basically an anarchist with this discourse having a lot in common with the Unabomber's manifesto but with all the racist and sexist prejudices of an 18th Century twat. All pure conjecture which he even admits at one point but actually waves it off saying there's obviously no other explanations for what he observes: because this one time therefore I'm right.

Rousseau believes rape is caused by society's laws influenced by women causing men to lust after certain traits of beauty. Something "savage man" doesn't comprehend therefore "savage man" never rapes. Apparently just like the Caribbeans who are all lacking civility but fired by passions. Yet due to their simple/savage nature don't rape.

It gets slightly better in part II but not by much and it's still filled with conjecture and unfounded crap. This book made me angry.

I can't believe this is considered a classic. I swear people just nod their head and agree it's a classic to seem intellectual.

Utter, utter tripe.

foxowl2005's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thegreatgatsbee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

2.5

flowerbinsh's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced

2.0

Read this book for a required class.

The intense amount of racism and misogyny throughout this book is honestly astounding-how can a man hold so much prejudice and immediately contradict it sentences later? Rousseau cannot hold a single stable thought throughout this entire essay. 

It's interesting to read in almost a masochistic way, but would never have picked this up on my own. Tired of reading about awful white cishet men in the college curriculum. 

loyaultemelie's review against another edition

Go to review page

Rousseau is the actual worst (this is about his views on women; also Locke did it better)

salon3ly's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective fast-paced

3.0

insufferable. but also he ate tho!! so true rousseau law and property are the cause of all our problems. and white men like you !!! 

abfreda184's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny informative medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ad7leb36's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

BIG TIME SLAY
jean jacques (jj) a tout dit tout vu tout fait et tout compris. if you want to educate yourself on politics, this is where you should definitely start. it's quite an easy read for a philosophical essay (well, seemingly at least), and it gives you an idea of the broad state of society. it is accurate, worryingly so, and insightful, worryingly so.
invented karl marx. would have stolen your girlfriend.

harry_7's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

3.0

goosemixtapes's review against another edition

Go to review page

JJ rousseau my bestie worstie. mary wollstonecraft was right to dunk him like a basketball for the general misogyny, but after reading the second discourse for class, i have grudgingly recovered some respect for him. the man can write & he makes a lot of good points. even if, to a teenage dyke living in the 21st century, it sometimes reads like [joker voice] we live in a society