Reviews tagging 'Sexual harassment'

American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis

147 reviews

jade_smith's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

 Okay, I have a lot to say about this book.

Much of which is indelibly shaped by my experience borrowing it from the library. In Australia, this book is heavily restricted. I had to show ID to prove that I'm over 18 (I seldom get ID'd buying alcohol anymore, so this was both flattering and amusing). The librarian then retrieved the book from back of house, and handed it to me in a sealed opaque bag, with strict instructions regarding the handling and returning of the book. She was equally bemused by the whole process.

The censorship of this book in Australia is genuinely baffling. To steal a quote from Irvine Walsh's introduction to the 2012 edition: "This is one of the great hypocrisies of our cultural life. Copious gore and representations of the dismemberment of young women are considered fair game in the name of mass entertainment, yet deemed unacceptable as devices of metaphor and symbol in a critical and conceptual (if also visceral), state-of-the-nation novel."

This book was unarguably graphic. I have a high tolerance for gore, and would not recommend this book to anyone who is even slightly squeamish. But also... perhaps I would. Because I think there is value in discomfort. And this novel is nothing if not uncomfortable. And that discomfort is core to it's success as the most brilliantly biting satire of American consumerism, greed, and chauvinism that I've ever read.

I did a bit of research into feminist critiques of this novel from the time of it's release in the 1990's, and while I get what they're saying... I kinda totally disagree. The character of Patrick Bateman is misogynistic. This novel is not misogynistic -- to me, it's quite clearly an indictment of the behaviour of "men like that." Good satire takes things to the extreme. And indeed, is this not the most extreme manifestation of the "misogynistic comments amongst mates" to femicide pipeline?

It was also incredibly funny. Patrick Bateman is one of the most pathetic point of view characters I've ever read, and there are points at which his ineptitude and insecurity provide points of genuinely brilliant black comedy.

There's something that I want to say here about this novel in a post-Trump age -- the way in which 1980's business mogul Trump is a near-mythologized figure in the eyes of Patrick Bateman. There's something here about how the cruelty, callousness, and selfishness of Bateman and his contemporaries has wormed it's way into 21st Century American society. There's something here about aesthetic consumption and ideology.

There's also something here about the way in which Patrick Bateman is constantly saying the quiet part out loud -- blatantly admitting to his associates that he's a serial killer. There's an ambiguity as to whether these deliberate slips are real, or whether they're part of Bateman's unreliable narration. But, if we are to assume that in the context of this novel as an exaggeration and as a satire that they are in-universe dialogue -- there's something here about how these people are willing to brush over and justify the articulation of the most callous tendencies, on account of the fact that they just don't care. Bateman feels and says externally what all of these people feel and say internally. There's something here about the rise of blatantly fascist dialogue in the USA. Perhaps we now live in a world full of Patrick Bateman's.

Anyway -- I truly have so much more I could say about this book. I'm glad I read it. I want to write an essay on it. I'm preemptively mortified by the fact of returning this to the library in it's opaque sleeve. If I ever start referencing a need to return library books at odd hours, know that I've gone the way of Bateman. And perhaps then the Australian government will feel justified in their censorship of this novel, for truly they must think it has some near-mystical ability to instigate harm. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

modernprometheus's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

One of the most uncomfortable books I ever read.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

illtakethenightshiftx's review against another edition

Go to review page

might switch to audio. Paperback format isn’t working for me because the book is soooo stream of consciousness. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ckopack's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

I can see why this book got made into a movie, but if you’re interested in the premise at all, you should really just watch the movie. This book was a drag.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

atomicbritt's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hjb_128's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

stelford68's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

biobeetle's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

wishlissa's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I don’t know whether to rate this a 5 or a 1. I really enjoyed the writing, particularly toward the beginning and very end of the book. Ellis does a great job of slowly introducing Pat’s descent into madness and stepping up the stakes chapter by chapter. However… I will also never read this again. Nor will I ever recommend it to someone else. 

The satire is SEARING. It is so good, a disturbing point being made with terrifying clarity. However I still found it difficult to stomach the increasingly atrocious violence. And at a certain point - even the recognizing a point being drawn about it being senseless, repetitive, overwhelming — it just became too gratuitous. I had to skim large sections of it.

I knew going in that I was signing up for body horror but i didn’t expect it to be so… creative..

I’m going to go pick up a comfort read now.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

_readerfromtheblacklagoon_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings