Reviews

Rozšírenie bojového poľa by Mária Ferenčuhová, Michel Houellebecq

annalouise's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

May not have loved the book, but the last line, 'It will not take place, the sublime fusion; the goal of life is missed. It is two in the afternoon', was enough to bump it from a middling 3 star to 3.5. I think the first two parts were rather weak, but the development of the narrator's psyche in the last part makes up for the drag of the beginning. 

The novel is more of a voyeurism of the tech work environment than a commentary on it, although the commentary comes from that voyeurism. The equation of financial culture with sexual is an interesting and accurate one, insofar as you view sex in a capitalist society as a commodity. Tisserand's particular plight is interesting in that regard, and the narrator attempts to act out his own fantasies - he is passive yet opinionated, he silently hates everything around him, but never makes an attempt himself to change it - to get revenge on his ex-lover through a stand-in (Tisserand for him and the girl for Véronique). Echoes the quiet misogyny of many novels of its time and before, it is simply not interesting any longer.

The animal dialogue segments reinforce the overall tone of the narrator's thoughts, and particularly his penchant for projecting his own desires onto others, here acting them out in his fictions. I did, however, think they were thrown in as an attempt at originality which came across bizarre and useless. They don't add much to the story at all that isn't already - or couldn't be - explored through the existing content of the novel.

e_etcetera's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Je m'interdisais de lire cet auteur. Il a fallu qu'un mec mignon m'en parle pour que je sois faible et me decide à mourir moins bête sans en attendre grand chose.
C'est mysogine, à la limite de l'apologie de la violence domestique. Cet homme semble un être misérablement frustré sexuellement et sentimentalement et préfère le mettre sur le dos des femmes que sur ses propres turpitudes.

rol's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark funny reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Entiendo que no sea plato de gusto de muchas personas. El personaje de una novela tiende a identificarse con su autor. Y el personaje derruido de ésta novela encarna lo peor que se agita bajo la apariencia civilizada de nuestra era post industrial. A pesar de todo, el mecanismo de identificación hace que acompañemos con empatía a un personaje nada, o casi nada, empático. Es un libro que aúna humor con desesperación sin por ello sumirnos en la desesperanza. A veces roza la parodia y otras veces el lirismo. Su equilibrio, a pesar de la brutalidad con la que está cincelado, es delicado. Una obra maestra no apta para todos los públicos.

crissy_estev's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

nonoemi's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Michel Houellebecq has been described as the enfant terrible of contemporary French writers. And I think that’s an apt description, in the same way that Macaulay Culkin in The Good Son or that rambunctious kid from The Omen were enfant terribles...

Read the rest of my thoughts on Houellebecq's Whatever at www.joaquinlowe.com/blog on on my blog here on my author page at goodreads!

kinnimomo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

laura_bower's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I really don't get why I like this kind of thing so much... by "this thing" I mean gloomy manchild incel moaning and mean-spiritedness. For some reason I'm always quite onboard for delving into this kind of pointless mentality, a big fan of Diary of a Oxygen Thief, Notes From the Underground, and all that sort of stuff. But what's weird is that I find these kinds of attitudes intolerable in real life. Maybe there's just something good about getting a little peer behind the curtain, though I don't want it right in front of me.

Either way, Whatever is another one of those books, so I loved it more than what I probably should, even though I wouldn't say it was doing anything especially new. Would recommend it if you're also into that kind of thing.

gera_mtz's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad slow-paced

3.75

awlks's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

zackario's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

très particulier de savoir que ce qui a le plus choqué les lecteurs à la sortie du livre était la critique de l'engrenage du travail et non sa misogynie.