Reviews tagging 'Animal cruelty'

Post Office by Charles Bukowski

5 reviews

alex60517's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nessazee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

olijordan's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

A coworker said to read this. I’ll promptly be throwing it at his head. Fuck this guy and the author

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nikwui's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.75

This book was such a waste of time, I wouldn’t recommend this to my worst enemy 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

heather_lt's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I have questions I need answering. What was the author's intention by having this published? Is the reader supposed to sympathise with the main character? How is this considered a classic? 

There's no real plot, only snapshots as the story jumps from one stage of Henry Chinaski's tragic, hopeless life to another. You really get to learn all about him and he's really all kinds of gross. It's written in the same derogatory style reminiscent of the short stories I've read by Nathaneal West. Positively rife with all the -isms. The only reason this is getting a three star rating is because it was vaguely entertaining reading how Chinaski lived his life (in a I-can't-look-away kind of way). 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings