Scan barcode
rnbhargava's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Mental illness, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, and Classism
It’s a horror book with messy histories between its characters. They go and mess with stuff they probably shouldn’t have messed with because they love going to haunted or supposedly haunted places. There is gruesome material as it plays out.wrensreadingroom's review against another edition
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Chronic illness, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Gore, Infidelity, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Physical abuse, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, Blood, Excrement, Vomit, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, Medical trauma, Suicide attempt, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
peachmoni's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Gore, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Body horror, Bullying, Death, Self harm, Blood, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Excrement, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Alcohol, and Classism
oddreads_nicolestins's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Body horror and Blood
Moderate: Toxic friendship and Alcohol
Minor: Infidelity, Excrement, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
vaguely_pink's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.25
Graphic: Body horror, Cursing, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Confinement, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Grief, Murder, and Alcohol
Minor: Body shaming, Bullying, Drug use, Fatphobia, Infidelity, Excrement, Vomit, Fire/Fire injury, and Gaslighting
lilybear3's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.75
I felt like the writing was trying too hard to be profound and have those memorable one-liners. Nothing interesting/scary happens until halfway through the book. The story up until then had revolved around the friend drama (it doesn't stop there, it's constant to the point of annoying). For me, lack of communication in a story makes me furious so the lack of realistic dialogue wasn't great. For example,
Onto the characters: they are insufferable. The only one I sort of cared for was Lin. The ending was not what I would've liked.
None of the characters were connected to this environment, so we had a group of tourists/non-native Japanese go to the house for funsies because she wanted to get married in a haunted house. It just doesn't make sense, even for a fictional story.
I had no expectations going into this, the cover made it look scary and eerie but there was so much drama between the friends and not enough spooky that I lost interest quickly.
Graphic: Bullying, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Gore, Self harm, Blood, Grief, Murder, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
dustghosts's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
+ when it wasn’t too forced, the writing— particularly figurative language and sense descriptions— could be quite beautiful
+ i loooove a horror story with house-as-character, and there were times when this came off particularly eerie. i wish this had been pushed a little more, given depth, something more complicated than
+ i do think khaw captures a certain kind of former-to-forced friendship really well in this group, with twisty histories between them and palpable built up resentments
o the author often uses Japanese words and terminology that will require non-speakers to do some research. i don’t personally think this is a con, but other reviewers have mentioned it and it is worth being prepared for. not everything has to be made easy for an english-speaking audience.
- none of these characters, however, come across as particularly likeable, complex, or clever, nor do they have much development for better or for worse— and I think you need at least one of those if you want my investment. instead they all seem pared down to the most basic of their traits, and the descriptions of those wind up feeling repetitive, like we’re rarely if ever learning anything new about the characters— just finding new ways to describe the same traits that our narrator has only disdain for.
- bizarre treatment of mental illness here— the POV character has had a struggle that reads true-to-life and is still dealing with the repercussions of that in a way that’s a little painful (not necessarily in a bad way) and similarly realistic. but the way that
- pacing is a problem. at times it drones (I found it really difficult to get into), at times it skips forward too fast, at times it seems unmatched to the urgency of what’s actually happening in the scene.
- I would like to give some benefit of the doubt that some of this has to do with characterization of the narrator (cat is someone who considers herself smarter than most of the people in the room, while at the time still being a little discombobulated and learning how to person again). however. overall, I think it could have used another editing pass— often the writing seems staccato, too many half-sentences and incomplete thoughts stacked against each other. when it isn’t that, it’s often overly verbose to the point of being inaccessible, hard to parse, metaphors made too specific so as to be ineffective (distracting or abstracted, vs evocative).
- while the length made this an easy read, combined with the pacing issues, it also made everything from the climax to the end feel stilted— either too easy or not as impactful as it could be given some room to breathe. the “front” of the book feels heavier than the meat of the haunting, like we’re being set up for the characters to face something much more challenging and frightening than what actually happens.
- to that end? I feel that the resolution was too easy, too loosely-justified, and honestly a bit too blasé for what could have been the tragedy of it. and that has to do with aaaall of those other flaws. in general, the book doesn’t have any real concept of hierarchy of information— what’s important to the writer, the characters, the house, or to the reader?
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Murder, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Body shaming, Confinement, Fatphobia, Mental illness, Self harm, and Suicidal thoughts
thewereraven's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Toxic relationship, Blood, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cursing, Infidelity, Mental illness, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Murder, Gaslighting, Alcohol, and Classism
Minor: Excrement
andyandnormski's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
What I didn't enjoy: The characters needed more time to develop. I had a rough idea of personalities but I felt like there needed to be more detail on why some of them hated each other so much. There needed to be more reasoning why everyone but Cat, the main character, was so quick to pure rage. And when I say quick, I mean quick. They would change their emotions and disposition towards each on a whim, sometimes within the same sentence and with no reason other than "this person makes me irrationally angry just because." I feel like a lot of the issues I had with the characters could have benefited from the story being longer.
All in all I regret purchasing this in hardcover. It's genuinely one of the worst books I've ever read.
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Grief
vaniavela's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Blood, Vomit, and Murder
Moderate: Gaslighting