Reviews tagging 'Rape'

Bridgerton Collection, Volume One by Julia Quinn

4 reviews

itsdelladarling's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful inspiring medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.75

I found the writing style of all three books within Volume 1 to be quite well written. The story sucks the reader in, and defin tely held my attention throughout reading. I will say that, while this is a period romance that was written some time ago, the couples all seem to be verying degrees from a little to very toxic.

I love the way the author shifts slightly the way characters speak, and their mannerisms. It helps clearly define each character as an individual, even while within the series.

Absolutely LOVE how kind, and loving the Bridgerton family is with one another! It's refreshing and warm and generally lovely to read of a large family that truly cares for one another.

I would recommend not reading the second epilogues until you've read the full series, if you don't want any spoilers.

My detractors:
Daphne
forcing Simon to ejaculate inside her, knowing he didn't want a kid, is rape. Full stop. She didn't have consent. Whatever he lied about or omitted didn't make that okay.

Antony
forcing a kiss on Kate?
hard pass. And also when he
stands on her hand & kicks her in the stomach?
Absolutely not. Then the final straw for him is when Kate
asked for some reprieve before they had sex for the first time and he said no.
.

Benedict & Sophie seemed to be an oddly violent couple. Also, it made my skin crawl when he
straight up blackmailed and kidnapped her after asking her to be his mistress
While I understand that for the period it was written, it would have
potentially been extremely dangerous for her to just be a single woman alone, honestly, that doesn't excuse it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

annelihghh's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

helliepad's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

Very different from the show and I am of mixed opinion for both. This is a regency romance story written by a white woman published in the early 2000s, so I expected the casual sexism, misogyny, fatphobia, and occassional tone deafness of the text because leading men in romance novels back then was Just Like That. And nobody reads romance for historical accuracies or treatises on social justice, right? Well it's too bad because I didn't stop reading throughout the years and I can say I've been spoiled by romance books that DID incorporate relevant social issues as part of the text— now all the red flags in this text stand out so severely to me. Which sucks because clearly the intent for deeper characterization is there, it's just not explored because it really isn't part of the story Ms. Quinn wanted to tell.

I get the charm of romantic historical fiction. But sometimes it's just not. Good. You know? I'll read the rest of the series still but the only good book in this story was The Viscount Who Loved Me and even then the leading man was an ass.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aryawolf's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny hopeful lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings