Scan barcode
rosie_valadez's review against another edition
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Police brutality, Grief, and Death of parent
Moderate: Kidnapping
Minor: Animal death, Infidelity, and Pregnancy
tomboyaoi's review against another edition
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death, Toxic relationship, and Gaslighting
Minor: Animal death, Death of parent, and Injury/Injury detail
astrohannah's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death and Death of parent
Minor: Rape and Sexual assault
el_viral's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Haunting. This is beautifully written prose, dream-like storytelling. The gradual disappearance fuels existential dread. At first, I thought there may be some way of saving the island and our protagonist, but in the end the slow ebbing away feels inevitable.
Content Warnings
Minor: Death and Death of parent
mikathereviewer's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
‘And no matter how wonderful the memory, it vanishes if you leave it alone, if no one pays attention to it. They leave no trace, no evidence that they ever existed.’
- R
Alright it would be a lie to say that either this book or the one I previously read didn't put me into a reading slump. Mainly 'cause both were slow-paced and I really can't stand slow-paced books unless I'm really really interested or investigated into the story and don't mind if it's more detailed and slower. But that rarely the case and this book didn't even have a plot, it had more vibes than anything as the characters were quite flat too.
The book was more based on meaning than anything else. So if you don't understand the meaning this book might be boring. I did understand it, but as I said the slow-pacing got on my nerves. Especially as I already understood the meaning before the story even ended in a way most would say brutal or traumatising. If you are a slow thinker or in general never was thinking a lot of existence and memory than a slow-pace might be actually good, but for me it was exhausting as I already understood the message after like 10 chapters especially as it had a reference I knew very well (even though I'm not sure if that was done on purpose, but it reminded me of it A LOT).
The reference or at least what the book reminds me of is actually national socialism. Why? First of all, we have a (police) force which tries at first in soft ways to get people to do what they want (just like the political party did) and got more and more brutal and extreme over time.
Here are a couple of examples from the book:
1. The people in the street watched tensely, some ducking into nearby alleys, and they all seemed to hope that the scene unfolding before them would be over before they themselves were pulled into it. (also acting like they saw nothing, too afraid the same happens to them)
2. “And no footsteps, or running water for the toilet.” (for those who don't know: When people hid they usually didn't ran the toilet water as it made sounds that would attract attention)
3. “But today was different somehow. They took four people at once from the center of town, in broad daylight. As far as I know, they’ve generally acted at night, on the edge of town, taking just one member of a family.” (getting more brutal over time)
4. “A safe house,”
5. The methods used by the Memory Police were becoming more and more brutal. No longer were there advance warnings of their visits. Everything happened by surprise, and they now carried heavy battering rams capable of breaking down any door. They invaded houses in search of any space where someone could be hidden—storage rooms, under beds, in the back of closets. If there was enough space for one human body, it was unlikely to escape their attention. They dragged out anyone they found, along with those who had hidden them, and loaded them all in the covered trucks.
There were lots of other things but I don't want to spoiler anything, but it remembers me a lot of national socialism and actually is the main reason I gave this book 3 stars (and not less), as I'm fascinated from fascism and national socialism. Truly sad and perhaps the reason why people say that this book is disturbing or traumatising. Since the whole police force and brutality is a major plot thing I would suggest anyone who doesn't like this or is triggered by this to not read this book.
Another reason I gave this book 3 stars even though I had a hard time reading sometimes (due to slow pace + being in a reading slump, but I think it's rather the previous book than this one that caused it); Is that I liked the message behind this book. If you didn't understand it fully or not at all I recommend to you (a lot actually) that you re-read the book someday as the message is very powerful. My quote above also helps to get the idea of what the book is trying to tell us (but not only that of course).
Very interesting message this book has and even though there is no plot or character based story the message is quite powerful and in my opinion I even think one can interpret it in many different ways and not just one which makes the message even more beautiful.
16. July 2024
- R
Alright it would be a lie to say that either this book or the one I previously read didn't put me into a reading slump. Mainly 'cause both were slow-paced and I really can't stand slow-paced books unless I'm really really interested or investigated into the story and don't mind if it's more detailed and slower. But that rarely the case and this book didn't even have a plot, it had more vibes than anything as the characters were quite flat too.
The book was more based on meaning than anything else. So if you don't understand the meaning this book might be boring. I did understand it, but as I said the slow-pacing got on my nerves. Especially as I already understood the meaning before the story even ended in a way most would say brutal or traumatising. If you are a slow thinker or in general never was thinking a lot of existence and memory than a slow-pace might be actually good, but for me it was exhausting as I already understood the message after like 10 chapters especially as it had a reference I knew very well (even though I'm not sure if that was done on purpose, but it reminded me of it A LOT).
The reference or at least what the book reminds me of is actually national socialism. Why? First of all, we have a (police) force which tries at first in soft ways to get people to do what they want (just like the political party did) and got more and more brutal and extreme over time.
Here are a couple of examples from the book:
1. The people in the street watched tensely, some ducking into nearby alleys, and they all seemed to hope that the scene unfolding before them would be over before they themselves were pulled into it. (also acting like they saw nothing, too afraid the same happens to them)
2. “And no footsteps, or running water for the toilet.” (for those who don't know: When people hid they usually didn't ran the toilet water as it made sounds that would attract attention)
3. “But today was different somehow. They took four people at once from the center of town, in broad daylight. As far as I know, they’ve generally acted at night, on the edge of town, taking just one member of a family.” (getting more brutal over time)
4. “A safe house,”
5. The methods used by the Memory Police were becoming more and more brutal. No longer were there advance warnings of their visits. Everything happened by surprise, and they now carried heavy battering rams capable of breaking down any door. They invaded houses in search of any space where someone could be hidden—storage rooms, under beds, in the back of closets. If there was enough space for one human body, it was unlikely to escape their attention. They dragged out anyone they found, along with those who had hidden them, and loaded them all in the covered trucks.
There were lots of other things but I don't want to spoiler anything, but it remembers me a lot of national socialism and actually is the main reason I gave this book 3 stars (and not less), as I'm fascinated from fascism and national socialism. Truly sad and perhaps the reason why people say that this book is disturbing or traumatising. Since the whole police force and brutality is a major plot thing I would suggest anyone who doesn't like this or is triggered by this to not read this book.
Another reason I gave this book 3 stars even though I had a hard time reading sometimes (due to slow pace + being in a reading slump, but I think it's rather the previous book than this one that caused it); Is that I liked the message behind this book. If you didn't understand it fully or not at all I recommend to you (a lot actually) that you re-read the book someday as the message is very powerful. My quote above also helps to get the idea of what the book is trying to tell us (but not only that of course).
Very interesting message this book has and even though there is no plot or character based story the message is quite powerful and in my opinion I even think one can interpret it in many different ways and not just one which makes the message even more beautiful.
16. July 2024
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Police brutality, Death of parent, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Rape and Sexual assault
Minor: Animal death, Infidelity, and Pregnancy
arayo's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement and Death
Moderate: Body horror, Terminal illness, and Toxic relationship
Minor: Infidelity, Sexual assault, Police brutality, and Death of parent
pyroclast17's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Confinement, Death, Forced institutionalization, Police brutality, Kidnapping, and Death of parent
Minor: Body horror
readwithsophsx's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Gore, Torture, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Police brutality, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, Fire/Fire injury, Injury/Injury detail, and Deportation
ahsokascult's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Forced institutionalization and Police brutality
Moderate: Death, Infidelity, and Death of parent
anemosise's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
totally understand why some wouldn't enjoy this book, it's a bit slow and doesn't answer all the questions it raises, but i really liked a lot of concepts at play in this :) we don't ever fully understand the memory police, which I think makes sense to me. i get that it could be a let down, but truly, the people under rule will never truly understand the government or a totalitarian regime. this book is about an apathy and the effects on the people who dont fully understand what is happening in their world. being forced to be complacent with the loss of things we once thought to treasure, and accepting as the world grows darker and blander. how do we continue going when we lose our sense of comprehension?? anyways. i liked this!!!
a short essay i liked about the book:
https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mqr/2021/07/yoko-ogawas-the-memory-police-and-the-dangers-of-forgetting/
first book I've read properly in a few months cause I've been busyyyyy.. excited to read more this summer!
a short essay i liked about the book:
https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mqr/2021/07/yoko-ogawas-the-memory-police-and-the-dangers-of-forgetting/
first book I've read properly in a few months cause I've been busyyyyy.. excited to read more this summer!
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death and Death of parent