Scan barcode
oeunoia's review against another edition
dark
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
I really didn't enjoy reading this book, every other paragraph goes into how the main character is feeling, but it reads like an Ikea catalogue.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Medical trauma, and Lesbophobia
Moderate: Hate crime
kaylo88's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
After completing the book, I find myself grappling with a whirlwind of emotions. On one hand, I was drawn to the captivating storyline and its thought-provoking premise, particularly the accurate portrayal of right-wing media and the potential societal reactions to the birth of female-only babies in lesbian families. The book also effectively delved into the myriad of emotions that accompany pregnancy and the rollercoaster of experiences, especially relating to the treatment of the "o-o" storyline.
However, there were certain aspects of the story that left me perplexed. For instance, I found myself questioning the lack of vetting procedures for the program's staff and the absence of contractual safeguards to prevent the infiltration of individuals with bigoted views. Furthermore, I was troubled by the apparent exclusion of other segments of society, such as the trans and non-binary communities, which led me to ponder whether there were underlying TERF (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) undertones, although I hope that is not the case.
The overwhelmingly negative portrayal of the "o-o" program left me unsettled, as I struggled to believe that the LGBTQ+ community wouldn't actively challenge this narrative. In reality, I anticipated a more robust response, with counter protests and advocacy for providing lesbian couples with additional choices. Additionally, the portrayal of the main characters, Jules and Rosie, was somewhat disheartening. Jules came across as domineering and irksome, while Rosie's characterisation left me feeling a lack of empathy or curiosity about her. She just seemed weak and dare I say it, boring. Given that the couple served as the focal point of the narrative, I had hoped to genuinely empathise with them; however, I found this to be challenging.
Furthermore, the characters' isolated existence, with minimal friends and support systems beyond a male friend of Rosie's, their parents, and a few of Jules' colleagues, seemed peculiar. I found myself questioning why they lacked a network of queer friends and a support system, especially considering that it would seemingly be a critical criterion for participants in the program. It struck me as implausible that LGBTQ+ couples would lack a circle of queer friends entirely.
My feelings about Jules' manager mirrored my other concerns. While I acknowledge that homophobia is unfortunately prevalent, the manager's reprehensible comments and discriminatory behavior, openly displayed in the workplace, left me bewildered as to why he wasn't promptly removed from his position. It was difficult to understand why there wasn't a more forceful response to his behavior.
Despite these reservations, I felt compelled to see the story through to its conclusion. I was eager to witness the fate of their daughter and whether Jules and Rosie found a sense of contentment. Nonetheless, the swift conclusion to the story felt rushed, particularly after the deliberate pacing throughout the majority of the book.
However, there were certain aspects of the story that left me perplexed. For instance, I found myself questioning the lack of vetting procedures for the program's staff and the absence of contractual safeguards to prevent the infiltration of individuals with bigoted views. Furthermore, I was troubled by the apparent exclusion of other segments of society, such as the trans and non-binary communities, which led me to ponder whether there were underlying TERF (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) undertones, although I hope that is not the case.
The overwhelmingly negative portrayal of the "o-o" program left me unsettled, as I struggled to believe that the LGBTQ+ community wouldn't actively challenge this narrative. In reality, I anticipated a more robust response, with counter protests and advocacy for providing lesbian couples with additional choices. Additionally, the portrayal of the main characters, Jules and Rosie, was somewhat disheartening. Jules came across as domineering and irksome, while Rosie's characterisation left me feeling a lack of empathy or curiosity about her. She just seemed weak and dare I say it, boring. Given that the couple served as the focal point of the narrative, I had hoped to genuinely empathise with them; however, I found this to be challenging.
Furthermore, the characters' isolated existence, with minimal friends and support systems beyond a male friend of Rosie's, their parents, and a few of Jules' colleagues, seemed peculiar. I found myself questioning why they lacked a network of queer friends and a support system, especially considering that it would seemingly be a critical criterion for participants in the program. It struck me as implausible that LGBTQ+ couples would lack a circle of queer friends entirely.
My feelings about Jules' manager mirrored my other concerns. While I acknowledge that homophobia is unfortunately prevalent, the manager's reprehensible comments and discriminatory behavior, openly displayed in the workplace, left me bewildered as to why he wasn't promptly removed from his position. It was difficult to understand why there wasn't a more forceful response to his behavior.
Despite these reservations, I felt compelled to see the story through to its conclusion. I was eager to witness the fate of their daughter and whether Jules and Rosie found a sense of contentment. Nonetheless, the swift conclusion to the story felt rushed, particularly after the deliberate pacing throughout the majority of the book.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Homophobia and Lesbophobia
Moderate: Miscarriage, Misogyny, and Pregnancy
amaranth_wytch's review against another edition
emotional
medium-paced
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Alcoholism, Bullying, Drug use, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Vomit, Medical content, Grief, Religious bigotry, Medical trauma, Stalking, Pregnancy, Lesbophobia, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Alcohol, and Classism
nonfictionfeminist's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
informative
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
A thought-provoking novel about what "motherhood" and "family" mean in a world where science can make changes in our most basic structures. Chadwick left me with so much to consider; while the main character is pretty unlikeable and I'm not sure about the main relationship, I don't think a character needs to be likeable for their story to be important. Excellent novel to bring to a book club discussion.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Bullying, Child abuse, Death, Hate crime, Homophobia, Lesbophobia, and Classism
misty_ttm's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This book, is an incredibly well written tale about a woman, Jules, struggling with both her own self worth and feelings about the baby she decided she would have with her partner Rosie. It really shows the difficulties of pregnancy quite well, as well as displays just how the media can be a harmful group for people.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug use, Miscarriage, Grief, Pregnancy, and Lesbophobia
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, and Death
More...