Scan barcode
katreads2022's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I find it extremely difficult to rate this book. While I personally do not enjoy Saramago’s dense writing, I appreciate its intelligence. Even though I trudged and, admittedly skipped—there is a whole section detailing medieval tortures allotted to alphabetically listed victims—through its intimidating blocks of text I recognize that the whole experience was marginally worth the time. It’s indeed a challenge to get through this deceivingly mid-sized novel. Chunks of texts drag on for pages upon pages, sentences rarely allowing one to take a breath. And quotation-less quotations. Unforgiving? Definitely.
Obviously, a non-canonical “Gospel” is blasphemous. The inversions presented in this novel are compelling because they offer a different chronology of a story so familiar. The narrator, an omnipresent yet strangely reminiscent figure, guides the reader through a retelling of Jesus Christ’s life that will surely scandalize some. At times vaguely satirical, Saramago captures a Biblical setting fairly well despite some clumsy modern flourishes. EGREGIOUS sexist commentary further drags down the writing.
“Gospel” is interesting, with a few interesting insights in to Christian theology because of its creative reversals. Both the content and prose are heavy, making this novel inaccessible and perhaps not worthwhile for most.
Obviously, a non-canonical “Gospel” is blasphemous. The inversions presented in this novel are compelling because they offer a different chronology of a story so familiar. The narrator, an omnipresent yet strangely reminiscent figure, guides the reader through a retelling of Jesus Christ’s life that will surely scandalize some. At times vaguely satirical, Saramago captures a Biblical setting fairly well despite some clumsy modern flourishes. EGREGIOUS sexist commentary further drags down the writing.
“Gospel” is interesting, with a few interesting insights in to Christian theology because of its creative reversals. Both the content and prose are heavy, making this novel inaccessible and perhaps not worthwhile for most.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Death, Gore, Torture, Violence, and Murder
Minor: Rape
seanml's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
How does someone gain an immense following, gain the powers of God, and be told they’re the main character without becoming even a little bit of an egomaniac? Easy, they don’t. And José Saramago thankfully realizes this. Despite being a skeptic’s look at the New Testament (Which I haven’t read, by the way), Saramago still treats most of what is written as if it had happened (Healing the sick, the perpetual virginity, directly speaking with God). The first half of the book follows Mary and Joseph and is immaculately quiet and reflective. The presence of a maybe-angel-maybe-not-an-angel is the source of a very unsettling feeling through the book’s first half. The Jesus-centric second half is interesting in that in the meetings with God, we learn that He is more or less the same wrathful, hypocritical, and egocentric God of the Torah. The tragedy is that everything is pre-ordained, and though Jesus realizes this, he can do nothing to change it. My Guy Yahweh saw the future with Morbius starring Jared Leto, and did nothing about it, smh. 7.5/10.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism and Death of parent
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Genocide, Gore, Misogyny, Antisemitism, Grief, and Abandonment
Minor: Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Stalking, Pregnancy, Colonisation, and War