Scan barcode
amy_in_the_city's review against another edition
emotional
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
I really loved a lot of things about this book. It was nice to see a clever, cunning FMC who uses her smarts to survive and is cynical and emotionally closed off and an MMC who is very peaceful, sensitive, gentle, and nonviolent. That is a nice reversal of what seems to be prevalent for leads in romance books. It was extra interesting to me that the vampire-type characters were very peaceful and concerned with not harming any living creature. I enjoyed the slow burn nature of the romance and the forbidden aspect of it. The flashback section to Cassia's childhood was heartbreaking but also really beautiful. I thought the book did a great job of showing how much that act of kindness meant to her. I also loved Cassia's dog that went everywhere with her.
The exposition was clunky at times with characters explaining things to people who already knew that information or having Cassia tell her plans to her dog. I think someone out there must be telling writers not to have the characters explain things in their inner monologue. I agree that isn't a great way of doing exposition, but I'd prefer inner monologue explanations over the "as you already know" conversations between characters. The pacing was off too. The first quarter of the book was difficult to get through. There was so much exposition but not much was actually happening and we didn't really know what the stakes were. This is more of a minor issue , but during the sex scenes, the main characters use made-up words (rhabdos and krana) in Lio's language to refer to their genitals. It was weird and took me out of the scenes a bit.
Where this book really faltered for me was in some of the more exclusionary aspects I felt lurking in the background. While Hesperine society was on the surface very sex-positive and accepting of different sexual orientations, there were some parts of the LGBTQIA+ community that I felt might be unwelcome in this world. There was some gender essentialist language used throughout the book. At one point, Cassia refers to her nether regions as "the emptiness inside her that marked her as a woman." Also, Hesperines believe that everyone has a fated mate and adults are supposed to feed off their lovers. If they don't have a lover, it seems they have to live off animal blood, which isn't as nourishing. I guess asexual and aromantic people don't exist in this world. In Lio's attempts to be sex-positive when he's going off about the lack of sexual freedom for women in Cassia's kingdom, he equates sex as being essential to being a real person and being alive, saying "We understand that desires are sacred. They make us who and what we are. They prove to us we live, that we are thinking, feeling beings with a consciousness seperate from others." Despite all the sex positivity, there was still quite a bit of the "virginity is a gift" type of sentiments. There is also some ableist language with the Hesperine healer, referring to some people with disabilities, saying he can "make their bodies whole again." All of these things just rubbed me the wrong way. I'll still read the next book in the series, but I'm hoping that it has less exclusionary language and that there is more explanation of how certain groups exist in Hesperine society.
The exposition was clunky at times with characters explaining things to people who already knew that information or having Cassia tell her plans to her dog. I think someone out there must be telling writers not to have the characters explain things in their inner monologue. I agree that isn't a great way of doing exposition, but I'd prefer inner monologue explanations over the "as you already know" conversations between characters. The pacing was off too. The first quarter of the book was difficult to get through. There was so much exposition but not much was actually happening and we didn't really know what the stakes were. This is more of a minor issue , but during the sex scenes, the main characters use made-up words (rhabdos and krana) in Lio's language to refer to their genitals. It was weird and took me out of the scenes a bit.
Where this book really faltered for me was in some of the more exclusionary aspects I felt lurking in the background. While Hesperine society was on the surface very sex-positive and accepting of different sexual orientations, there were some parts of the LGBTQIA+ community that I felt might be unwelcome in this world. There was some gender essentialist language used throughout the book. At one point, Cassia refers to her nether regions as "the emptiness inside her that marked her as a woman." Also, Hesperines believe that everyone has a fated mate and adults are supposed to feed off their lovers. If they don't have a lover, it seems they have to live off animal blood, which isn't as nourishing. I guess asexual and aromantic people don't exist in this world. In Lio's attempts to be sex-positive when he's going off about the lack of sexual freedom for women in Cassia's kingdom, he equates sex as being essential to being a real person and being alive, saying "We understand that desires are sacred. They make us who and what we are. They prove to us we live, that we are thinking, feeling beings with a consciousness seperate from others." Despite all the sex positivity, there was still quite a bit of the "virginity is a gift" type of sentiments. There is also some ableist language with the Hesperine healer, referring to some people with disabilities, saying he can "make their bodies whole again." All of these things just rubbed me the wrong way. I'll still read the next book in the series, but I'm hoping that it has less exclusionary language and that there is more explanation of how certain groups exist in Hesperine society.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual content, Violence, Xenophobia, Blood, Police brutality, Kidnapping, Grief, Religious bigotry, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Sexual harassment, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Child death, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Genocide, Sexual violence, and Acephobia/Arophobia
Minor: Ableism, Animal cruelty, Confinement, Hate crime, Torture, Forced institutionalization, Vomit, Death of parent, and War
More...