Scan barcode
sallythereadinggirl's review against another edition
emotional
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Ein Buch mit einem sehr interessanten Konzept!
Die Buchbinderin Ashlyn stößt auf zwei einzigartige Bücher. Das zweite scheint als Antwort auf das erste geschrieben worden zu sein und beide erzählen die selbe Geschichte. Belle und Hemi führen uns in ihrem jeweiligen Buch durch die Ereignisse im Jahr 1941 und beschreiben, wie sich ihre Liebe aus ihrer Sicht zugetragen hat. Die Echos beider Bücher, die Ashlyn beim Berühren der Werke fühlt sind beide von Kummer, Schmerz und Verrat geprägt. Kann sie durch die Bücher herausfinden, was sich wirklich zwischen den beiden Liebenden zugetragen hat?
Die Idee der beiden Bücher, bei denen das eine als Antwort auf das zweite geschrieben wurde und die sich gegenseitig ansprechen fand ich wirklich klasse! Man konnte direkt im Vergleich sehen, wie die andere Person die Geschehnisse empfunden hat und wie es sich aus ihrer Perspektive zugetragen hat.
Die Fähigkeit Ashlyns, die Echos der Bücher, also die Gefühle der Vorbesitzer, oder in diesem Fall der Verfassenden, zu fühlen, war eher nur am Rande ein Thema, auch wenn es ihr Interesse an den Büchern erklärte.
Neben der schönen und fesselnden Liebesgeschichte hat mir das Buch noch einige Facetten des Amerikas in den 40gern gezeigt. So wurden beispielsweise Antisemitismus und die Rolle der Frau thematisiert. Auch wenn die Frauenrolle in der hier gezeigten Oberschicht keineswegs repräsentativ für die meisten Frauen der damaligen Zeit ist, so konnten doch einige Ungerechtigkeiten gezeigt werden.
Der Schreibstil war sehr flüssig und ich habe das Buch geradezu verschlungen.
"Das Echo vergessener Bücher" ist ein empfehelnswerter Roman, der auf geschichte Weise zwischen zwei Zeiten und mehreren Perspektiven hin und her springt, und uns zeigt, dass unsere Sicht auf die Dinge nicht die einzige, und schon gar nicht unbefangen ist.
Danke an den Piper-Verlag und Netgalley für das Bereistellen eines Rezensionsexemplares im Austausch für eine ehrliche Rezension.
Die Buchbinderin Ashlyn stößt auf zwei einzigartige Bücher. Das zweite scheint als Antwort auf das erste geschrieben worden zu sein und beide erzählen die selbe Geschichte. Belle und Hemi führen uns in ihrem jeweiligen Buch durch die Ereignisse im Jahr 1941 und beschreiben, wie sich ihre Liebe aus ihrer Sicht zugetragen hat. Die Echos beider Bücher, die Ashlyn beim Berühren der Werke fühlt sind beide von Kummer, Schmerz und Verrat geprägt. Kann sie durch die Bücher herausfinden, was sich wirklich zwischen den beiden Liebenden zugetragen hat?
Die Idee der beiden Bücher, bei denen das eine als Antwort auf das zweite geschrieben wurde und die sich gegenseitig ansprechen fand ich wirklich klasse! Man konnte direkt im Vergleich sehen, wie die andere Person die Geschehnisse empfunden hat und wie es sich aus ihrer Perspektive zugetragen hat.
Die Fähigkeit Ashlyns, die Echos der Bücher, also die Gefühle der Vorbesitzer, oder in diesem Fall der Verfassenden, zu fühlen, war eher nur am Rande ein Thema, auch wenn es ihr Interesse an den Büchern erklärte.
Neben der schönen und fesselnden Liebesgeschichte hat mir das Buch noch einige Facetten des Amerikas in den 40gern gezeigt. So wurden beispielsweise Antisemitismus und die Rolle der Frau thematisiert. Auch wenn die Frauenrolle in der hier gezeigten Oberschicht keineswegs repräsentativ für die meisten Frauen der damaligen Zeit ist, so konnten doch einige Ungerechtigkeiten gezeigt werden.
Der Schreibstil war sehr flüssig und ich habe das Buch geradezu verschlungen.
"Das Echo vergessener Bücher" ist ein empfehelnswerter Roman, der auf geschichte Weise zwischen zwei Zeiten und mehreren Perspektiven hin und her springt, und uns zeigt, dass unsere Sicht auf die Dinge nicht die einzige, und schon gar nicht unbefangen ist.
Danke an den Piper-Verlag und Netgalley für das Bereistellen eines Rezensionsexemplares im Austausch für eine ehrliche Rezension.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism, Car accident, and Death of parent
Moderate: Suicide
Minor: Emotional abuse and War
infusionofviolets's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Bullying, Antisemitism, Death of parent, and Classism
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Infidelity, Mental illness, Suicide, Forced institutionalization, Xenophobia, Car accident, Suicide attempt, and War
Minor: Death, Misogyny, Self harm, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Grief, Pregnancy, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
fseely's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Suicide, Antisemitism, and Car accident
Minor: Child death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Genocide, Forced institutionalization, Death of parent, War, and Injury/Injury detail
jennswan's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Grief, and Death of parent
Moderate: Genocide, Infidelity, Mental illness, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism, Car accident, and Classism
tiiiger35's review against another edition
dark
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
This book had so much more depth to it than I expected. The dual timelines were interwoven so beautifully giving the story a consistent fluidity. As a highly sensitive person, I was drawn to Ashlynn’s gift as a book empath. What she considered a curse, became the very thing to change her life for the better.
This story is about more than romance, it deals with grief, heartbreak, remorse & survival. It also has some darker undertones surrounding; suicide, anti-semitism & the factions of Nazi supporters building in America during WW2.
It’s been a long time since I’ve felt the need to highlight so many quotes. I felt as if the words had been plucked from my own mind at times.
This is definitely a new favourite of mines that I’ll be recommending to my friends.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Death, Emotional abuse, Toxic relationship, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, and Pregnancy
Minor: Cancer, Mental illness, Religious bigotry, Car accident, Abandonment, and War
chacharlotte's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I was gonna give this 5 stars at first, but the last part really lets this book down in my opinion. It’s too much of a Hallmark happy end for what started out with beautifully written, complicated but compelling characters. I also didn’t like how Ashlyn‘s story was suddenly cast aside in favor of present day Marian‘s viewpoint.
What also bothers me are Ashlyn‘s magic powers, that seem like an afterthought/just thrown in there to give Ashlyn motivation to pursue the story of the two lovers. I think there could’ve been a way to tell this story without the magic - it doesn’t really add much, and it doesn’t really fit the vibe of the rest of the book. If you’re gonna add magic (which I’m not opposed to), I would think it would have more impact on the story and/or the characters. It just seemed kind of lazy?
The “plot twist” was pretty obvious as well, and I don’t think we needed all those chapters with Marian to reveal it. I think this would have been a much better book if Ashlyn had been the one to figure out the misunderstanding and Marian/Hemi’s reunion had been left to the imagination/not happened on page/not happened at all even.
What also bothers me are Ashlyn‘s magic powers, that seem like an afterthought/just thrown in there to give Ashlyn motivation to pursue the story of the two lovers. I think there could’ve been a way to tell this story without the magic - it doesn’t really add much, and it doesn’t really fit the vibe of the rest of the book. If you’re gonna add magic (which I’m not opposed to), I would think it would have more impact on the story and/or the characters. It just seemed kind of lazy?
Content Warnings
Moderate: Toxic relationship and Antisemitism
Minor: Child death, Mental illness, Suicide, Forced institutionalization, and Car accident
redheadorganist's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Confinement, Death, Mental illness, Terminal illness, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism, Grief, Death of parent, Pregnancy, and Abandonment
Moderate: Blood and Car accident
Minor: War
dany_casimiro's review against another edition
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
Long Story Short: lots of echoes, very little books.
Finally, a fiction book that breaches the topic of antisemitism in the 1940s USA – a great way to foster its discussion.
I really liked the idea behind book empathy – some people are sensitive enough to touch an object and feel emotions from its past. Granted, the book part earned most of my interest in this case. Sadly, it was more of an initial plot device to be used only as the plot demands than an actual integral part of the story. By the end of the 430 pages, it makes a feeble reappearance to remind readers that it has been there all along when the protagonist is sharing her ability with her love interest.
It has “books” in the title, the main character recovers and sells old books, and the only physical plot device is indeed a book. But on the topic of books, that’s pretty much it. The focus shifts completely to the story behind the book that Ashlyn, the protagonist, is reading and where her quest to find out more leads her. Romance, mystery, social critique – everything feels but halfway done. An exception is due when it comes down to Ashlyn’s traumatic experiences, as the author clearly couldn’t decide between an abusive marriage, a traumatic divorce, or witnessing the death of a soon-to-be ex-husband. So, she chose all the above. It would have been more passable if these instances had been better explored, rather than merely used as – again – a plot device for an extra layer in romance building. It became increasingly frustrating and boring, especially because every issue got solved so easily. Their point besides plot reasons is beyond my comprehension. The literary quotes at the beginning of each chapter did not help at all; they quickly became an insistent reminder that this was supposed to be a book about books, and it became a doomed romance.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Domestic abuse, Infidelity, Misogyny, Sexism, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Death and Antisemitism
Minor: Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, Car accident, and Gaslighting
jessican's review against another edition
emotional
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide, Xenophobia, Antisemitism, Car accident, and Death of parent
tiffyb's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.25
The Echo of Old Books started STRONG- I thought it might be five-star book. The premise was fantastic, the writing was beautiful, and the love story was touching. But as it went on, those stars dropped off, all the way down to two stars.
I won’t put the book’s blurb here because you can read that for yourself.
Let me condense my review into one paragraph, and you can optionally read the rest of my review (which is extraordinarily long and detailed, just like this book 🤪). 1) Ashlyn’s storyline simply didn’t need to exist. 2) I wish her ability to “sense” books had any purpose or part of the story, but it didn’t. 3) I wish any of the characters had been more likable. All of them turned out to be despicable. 4)I wish the author had simply switched gears and written a duel-narrative love story, because that was her strong suite 5) Every storyline was dragged on too long, and the “shocking twist” was so obvious it could have been seen from outer space.
Now onto my detailed and eternally long list of complaints, plot holes, and irritations!!🫣
- All three narratives (Ashlyn, Belle, and Hemi) are written in EXACTLY the same voice. I can imagine it’s really difficult to write with three different voices, but you shouldn’t write a book with so many narrators unless you can do that. Near the end of this book, we randomly get a FOURTH narrative (older Belle), which felt haphazard and sloppy so late in the game.
- Ashton’s ability to sense “echoes” from holding books turned out to have no impact on story and was only used to introduce the novel. (Someone please tell me if there’s a good book with a similar premise!!!)
- both of the “books inside the book” are actually super long letters written to the other jilted lover, yet it’s obvious that the books are just written for OUR reading. No ex would ever need to introduce people they both knew or remind their lost lover of details surrounding the first time they had sex or how they met, much less describing the color of a chair or the weather.
- Ashlyn is an AVID reader from childhood who owns a bookstore. How could she possibly be SO slow at reading these books?!? She spends hours reading the tiniest chapters. These two short books are taking her literal weeks to finish. WEEKS of engrossed reading, in spite of the fact that she’s a single woman with few responsibilities.
- The “modern narrative” portion of this book was placed in the 1980’s, and clearly It’s placed in that year so that Ashlyn can’t just google everything (instead she must run around pestering everyone and their mother, trying to answer her questions).
- Also like WHY DOESNT SHE JUST FINISH READING THE BOOKS before contacting the entire state of New York trying to find out more info on these people?!? For example, she foes wild trying to find out Goldie’s real name, when Goldie’s real name is right there in next chapter (which btw I think was a slip-up by the author😂).
- ALSO Ashlyn is desperately sleuthing to find these people in real life, but doesn’t notice that a key person has his first and middle name, occupation, birthday, AND place of birth are all laid out (Teddy, the ex fiancé)! Either we are to believe that Ashlyn is sosososo dumb (a reasonable guess based on the rest of the book), or this is a huge plot hole.
- Then Ashlyn CHASES this Ethan guy with the intensity of a psycho stalker, demanding info about his family and answers to her questions… before even finishing the books she has. Like the books are clearly here to answer her questions, so why in the world is she leaving repeated messages on a strangers phone and SHOWING UP AT HIS HOME when he said he wasn’t interested and doesn’t know anything about his family?!? Especially when she could A) finish the book and B) do some research using the names he gave her??? That’s Ashlyn for you!
- And how is this possibly the first time she’s found a book this fascinating?? She can literally feel past book owner’s feelings, and she is a USED bookstore owner. So I’m sorry but she would have likely felt many intense and mysterious stories.
- Plus Ashlyn is kinda awful. She asks a librarian friend to do major research for her, doesn’t even take the time to finish the books to get more info, THEN straight up refuses to tell the friend why she’s researching this (“I’m gonna wait till I know more before I say anything”). Sorry but what?!?
-She also spends the whole book feeling bad for herself because (amongst other things) her abused and battered mother “allowed herself to die from cancer” (yes you read that right), leaving Ashlyn alone. 🫣🥴
- Another reason to dislike Ashlyn is that every time she sees a picture of A CHILD (Zachary) she comments on how attractive he is and also on his full lips??? Weird??
- Note that there are very jarring references to suicide(several suicides, in fact), physical and mental abuse, and racism just tossed around in here like a trauma salad
- Did I mention that nothing in this book was surprising? I knew every single plot twist BEFORE 40%. I genuinely thought I was a few pages or maybe a chapter from the end of the book (because everything was so obviously laid out for us!), so I decided to look at how many pages were left (I was reading on a Kindle). I was at FIFTY PERCENT! That’s how predictable this book was! The second half of the book was an insanely slow uncovering of every single predictable thing I knew would happen.
- To find out at over 75% of the way through that we were essentially covering a backstory to the “main story” is wild. We could have skipped most of the book. I couldn’t believe we suddenly were getting a whole new narrative from present-day Belle.
- Sorry I’m so nitpicky but Hemi is the worst nickname ever (I assume pronounced “hemmy” - just say it out loud a couple times and then consider if you’d ever call your steamy lover HEMI!). Seriously if you want to shorten Hemingway, call him Hem. Or just nickname him something else or call him his name.
- Every little thing we had learned about Ashlyn was repeated *in detail* around the 60-80% mark, so why have it all spread throughout the book? Almost the entirety of Ashlyn’s story happens right around 70% through this book, and then her timeline just disappeared -because it doesn’t matter and never did.
- When Belle and Hemi finally meet each other, it is entirely separate from Ashlyn. She had no part in Belle and Hemi reuniting, finding out the truth, or making up. So I ask again, why is Ashlyn in this book?
- I kinda hate the whole “evil person sabotaging perfect relationship but lovers are too immature to communicate for even five minutes and see that they still love each other and it was just a misunderstanding and this lasts for way too long while said lovers spend endless years being angry at (but also in love with) one another before finally talking for five minutes and finding out that their relationship was sabotaged so they can finally reunite” trope.
- The fact that they wrote letters to one another, and those letters were BOOK LENGTH, yet they managed to randomly leave out the single detail that would have fixed everything is just so dumb haha. I mean every other inconsequential detail is spelled out.
- And finally. Belle was truly awful. Anyone who keeps her child from their father without the father even KNOWING THEY EXIST is horrific - unless the father is dangerous or a criminal. This was SO PETTY of Belle and she did NOT deserve to be forgiven for this. Especially when it was easy to find Hemi. And then! Hemi only needs *2 1/2 hours* to decide that he’s totally cool making up with Belle and forgiving her for THAT. When he spent 43 years, bitter and hardened, hating her, all because he thought she had written him a letter, saying she was going to STAY WITH HER FIANCÉ. Please. They had ten weeks of relationship before deciding to run off and he’s bitter she didn’t do it, but he’s cool just forgiving her for stealing his son from her for forty-three years. I cannot with this book.
Honestly?? After all that, I actually feel like the author is this book is still a good writer. She’s eloquent and had great ideas for characters and storylines and plot twists. I get the feeling that she was really passionate about the topics touched in her book, especially that she wanted to send out a message of forgiveness and letting go of hatred and hurt. I think she just got really caught up in writing and her editor was the one who failed here.
I won’t put the book’s blurb here because you can read that for yourself.
Let me condense my review into one paragraph, and you can optionally read the rest of my review (which is extraordinarily long and detailed, just like this book 🤪). 1) Ashlyn’s storyline simply didn’t need to exist. 2) I wish her ability to “sense” books had any purpose or part of the story, but it didn’t. 3) I wish any of the characters had been more likable. All of them turned out to be despicable. 4)I wish the author had simply switched gears and written a duel-narrative love story, because that was her strong suite 5) Every storyline was dragged on too long, and the “shocking twist” was so obvious it could have been seen from outer space.
Now onto my detailed and eternally long list of complaints, plot holes, and irritations!!🫣
- All three narratives (Ashlyn, Belle, and Hemi) are written in EXACTLY the same voice. I can imagine it’s really difficult to write with three different voices, but you shouldn’t write a book with so many narrators unless you can do that. Near the end of this book, we randomly get a FOURTH narrative (older Belle), which felt haphazard and sloppy so late in the game.
- Ashton’s ability to sense “echoes” from holding books turned out to have no impact on story and was only used to introduce the novel. (Someone please tell me if there’s a good book with a similar premise!!!)
- both of the “books inside the book” are actually super long letters written to the other jilted lover, yet it’s obvious that the books are just written for OUR reading. No ex would ever need to introduce people they both knew or remind their lost lover of details surrounding the first time they had sex or how they met, much less describing the color of a chair or the weather.
- Ashlyn is an AVID reader from childhood who owns a bookstore. How could she possibly be SO slow at reading these books?!? She spends hours reading the tiniest chapters. These two short books are taking her literal weeks to finish. WEEKS of engrossed reading, in spite of the fact that she’s a single woman with few responsibilities.
- The “modern narrative” portion of this book was placed in the 1980’s, and clearly It’s placed in that year so that Ashlyn can’t just google everything (instead she must run around pestering everyone and their mother, trying to answer her questions).
- Also like WHY DOESNT SHE JUST FINISH READING THE BOOKS before contacting the entire state of New York trying to find out more info on these people?!? For example, she foes wild trying to find out Goldie’s real name, when Goldie’s real name is right there in next chapter (which btw I think was a slip-up by the author😂).
- ALSO Ashlyn is desperately sleuthing to find these people in real life, but doesn’t notice that a key person has his first and middle name, occupation, birthday, AND place of birth are all laid out (Teddy, the ex fiancé)! Either we are to believe that Ashlyn is sosososo dumb (a reasonable guess based on the rest of the book), or this is a huge plot hole.
- Then Ashlyn CHASES this Ethan guy with the intensity of a psycho stalker, demanding info about his family and answers to her questions… before even finishing the books she has. Like the books are clearly here to answer her questions, so why in the world is she leaving repeated messages on a strangers phone and SHOWING UP AT HIS HOME when he said he wasn’t interested and doesn’t know anything about his family?!? Especially when she could A) finish the book and B) do some research using the names he gave her??? That’s Ashlyn for you!
- And how is this possibly the first time she’s found a book this fascinating?? She can literally feel past book owner’s feelings, and she is a USED bookstore owner. So I’m sorry but she would have likely felt many intense and mysterious stories.
- Plus Ashlyn is kinda awful. She asks a librarian friend to do major research for her, doesn’t even take the time to finish the books to get more info, THEN straight up refuses to tell the friend why she’s researching this (“I’m gonna wait till I know more before I say anything”). Sorry but what?!?
-She also spends the whole book feeling bad for herself because (amongst other things) her abused and battered mother “allowed herself to die from cancer” (yes you read that right), leaving Ashlyn alone. 🫣🥴
- Another reason to dislike Ashlyn is that every time she sees a picture of A CHILD (Zachary) she comments on how attractive he is and also on his full lips??? Weird??
- Note that there are very jarring references to suicide(several suicides, in fact), physical and mental abuse, and racism just tossed around in here like a trauma salad
- Did I mention that nothing in this book was surprising? I knew every single plot twist BEFORE 40%. I genuinely thought I was a few pages or maybe a chapter from the end of the book (because everything was so obviously laid out for us!), so I decided to look at how many pages were left (I was reading on a Kindle). I was at FIFTY PERCENT! That’s how predictable this book was! The second half of the book was an insanely slow uncovering of every single predictable thing I knew would happen.
- To find out at over 75% of the way through that we were essentially covering a backstory to the “main story” is wild. We could have skipped most of the book. I couldn’t believe we suddenly were getting a whole new narrative from present-day Belle.
- Sorry I’m so nitpicky but Hemi is the worst nickname ever (I assume pronounced “hemmy” - just say it out loud a couple times and then consider if you’d ever call your steamy lover HEMI!). Seriously if you want to shorten Hemingway, call him Hem. Or just nickname him something else or call him his name.
- Every little thing we had learned about Ashlyn was repeated *in detail* around the 60-80% mark, so why have it all spread throughout the book? Almost the entirety of Ashlyn’s story happens right around 70% through this book, and then her timeline just disappeared -because it doesn’t matter and never did.
- When Belle and Hemi finally meet each other, it is entirely separate from Ashlyn. She had no part in Belle and Hemi reuniting, finding out the truth, or making up. So I ask again, why is Ashlyn in this book?
- I kinda hate the whole “evil person sabotaging perfect relationship but lovers are too immature to communicate for even five minutes and see that they still love each other and it was just a misunderstanding and this lasts for way too long while said lovers spend endless years being angry at (but also in love with) one another before finally talking for five minutes and finding out that their relationship was sabotaged so they can finally reunite” trope.
- The fact that they wrote letters to one another, and those letters were BOOK LENGTH, yet they managed to randomly leave out the single detail that would have fixed everything is just so dumb haha. I mean every other inconsequential detail is spelled out.
- And finally. Belle was truly awful. Anyone who keeps her child from their father without the father even KNOWING THEY EXIST is horrific - unless the father is dangerous or a criminal. This was SO PETTY of Belle and she did NOT deserve to be forgiven for this. Especially when it was easy to find Hemi. And then! Hemi only needs *2 1/2 hours* to decide that he’s totally cool making up with Belle and forgiving her for THAT. When he spent 43 years, bitter and hardened, hating her, all because he thought she had written him a letter, saying she was going to STAY WITH HER FIANCÉ. Please. They had ten weeks of relationship before deciding to run off and he’s bitter she didn’t do it, but he’s cool just forgiving her for stealing his son from her for forty-three years. I cannot with this book.
Honestly?? After all that, I actually feel like the author is this book is still a good writer. She’s eloquent and had great ideas for characters and storylines and plot twists. I get the feeling that she was really passionate about the topics touched in her book, especially that she wanted to send out a message of forgiveness and letting go of hatred and hurt. I think she just got really caught up in writing and her editor was the one who failed here.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Forced institutionalization, Antisemitism, Car accident, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, and Abandonment
Minor: Alcoholism, Cancer, Child abuse, Child death, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Mental illness, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Forced institutionalization, Grief, Car accident, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Abandonment, and War