howattp's review

Go to review page

4.0

His is one of those events that, like Knightfall, every committed Batman fan should read because it's referred to so often. Gotham City is devastated by a horrific earthquake, unleashing chaos upon all, causing thousands of deaths, and threatening to expose Bruce Wayne's secret identity to the world.
It's well done for the most part, thoroughly exploring the widespread effect such a catastrophe would have on a city, and the nearly insurmountable challenge it brings to each of Gotham's heroes, be they masked or uniformed. It brings out the best and worst in people, and it leads to another event: No Man's Land.

davybaby's review

Go to review page

2.0

Oh, Batman. Why can't I quit you?

You'd think I'd have learned my lesson after your "defusing bombs via punching" antics in Arkham Origins. Or your comically raspy voice in The Dark Knight Rises. Seriously, it was like a high-school production of Batman. But no matter how many times you prove to me that you're only as strong as your creative team, I keep crawling back to your strong arms and chiseled jawline.

It's an interesting premise, I'll grant you that. Use a massive earthquake to show that for all Batman's impossible badassery, he is at the mercy of nature like everyone else. By showing how little impact he can have on such an earth-shaking (groan...) problem, you place him more in the realm of the human. And it more or less worked. Unfortunately, it doesn't make for a very entertaining read. You can only see so many people narrowly rescued from the rubble before it gets boring.

Spoiler Tangentially, I loved that a villain claims the earthquake as their handiwork and tries to cash in on the destruction. It was a believable touch, and gave a bit of mystery to an otherwise straightforward story.


The art is also pretty weak. It's only occasionally interesting enough to do more than glaze over it, and occasionally it's POWERFUL ugly.

So if, like me, you can't stay away from the dysfunction that is Batman, you might enjoy this. If you think he's an over-used and over-rated character who needs a break from the pop culture spotlight, this comes rated as "Highly Skippable."

dumblydore's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I like the premise of Gotham (ergo, Batman) being confronted with the devastating impact of a natural disaster, of something beyond mortal control, and what calamities result from the destruction in its wake; however, the sequence of the chain of events is sometimes confusing and tiresome given that many storylines are happening simultaneously, being told from multiple perspectives. Most of it doesn't serve the main narrative very much.

This is followed up by the epic, mind-bogglingly long No Man's Land arc. Brace yourself for the proverbially bumpy ride!

unibadger's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zoidberg684's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

3.0

thecommonswings's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It’s interesting that Alan Grant is all over this because in many ways the book is on an exercise in what he and John Wagner achieved in the Apocalypse War - trimming down a large creative universe into something more manageable - but in the more mature manner that Wagner would tackle alone with Day of Chaos. I wonder if Wagner had been paying attention to this because it’s very similar in tone but with Chaos benefiting from having one creative vision throughout

thiefofcamorr's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0


Really quite good :D I enjoyed this one almost as much as I enjoyed Year One and The Man Who Laughed, etc. It's not as good as Hush or The Long Halloween, but really very almost.

cjordahl's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I dug this one. It's the more grounded type of story, which I prefer over the fantastical. Most of the crossover stories work. Aside from Killer Croc, the villains are more criminal and dangerous (and insane) than supernatural. The ending was a letdown, with a weak sauce villain and Robin's boy detective solution to the crime.

The devastation to Gotham is portrayed as very heavy, I wonder how that will be handled in future volumes.

purplebubblesinmytea's review

Go to review page

4.0

This was better than I expected it to be, considering it's a major event. The overall concept was intriguing, with nature as an enemy. I really enjoyed the plotline with Quakemaster; it makes you think about what we've come to expect from superhero comics in terms of who the villain is and their role in a disaster. The issues focusing on other characters around Gotham and how they were faring were also much better than I'd anticipated they would be, and it was genuinely interesting to read them. They only major problem I have is that I wanted more Batman, and he was barely in it.
More...