cdbaker's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I wanted to like this more. And I did learn a lot. But I also felt fairly inundated with details a lot of the time.

sambailey's review

Go to review page

5.0

Fascinating research. Personally would have been fine with less ceramics content, but your mileage may vary.

kolymaarasto's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

2.5

sci_cloudy's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

3.75

suzecate's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative slow-paced

4.0

clamthegiant's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

vlwelser's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

panireads's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

2.5

rocabarraigh's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.0

drbird's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.5

I liked certain sections more than others. The fact that the author isn’t really a linguist makes some of the early parts both well explained but also possibly inaccurate. Still it’s an intriguing theory with plenty of data.