Scan barcode
ritchtea2's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, and War
keen's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, and Violence
Moderate: Animal death, Child abuse, and Child death
Minor: Alcoholism and Vomit
rain02's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Child death, Death, Gore, and Torture
Moderate: Confinement, Medical content, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Minor: Animal death
lostboylio's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
overall a very much horrifying read, a good story but the ending felt wrong and very rushed which i didn’t like
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Child abuse, Confinement, Death, and Gore
Moderate: Alcoholism, Child death, Cannibalism, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Gun violence, Car accident, and Death of parent
cheye13's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
I picked this up because I'd heard raving reviews about it, but I have to admit, I don't understand. I'd seen many say this was "more than a regular zombie book," but while I found it a decent "regular zombie book," I didn't find much more within it. I read Warm Bodies earlier this year, and these stories have much in common.
Every zombie book that's caught my interest always has a unique angle on the fictional science as well as social commentary. This one executes the tropes well, but not in a particularly new or fascinating way. The novel also spends the first chunk setting readers up to despise a number of the main characters, so I was lacking a concern or connection to make action scenes impactful. That lack of emotion probably also affected the pacing - I prefer there to be action or suspense to push such a story forward, and this story failed to create that for me.
In general, an entertaining but not very impactful read for me.
Every zombie book that's caught my interest always has a unique angle on the fictional science as well as social commentary. This one executes the tropes well, but not in a particularly new or fascinating way. The novel also spends the first chunk setting readers up to despise a number of the main characters, so I was lacking a concern or connection to make action scenes impactful. That lack of emotion probably also affected the pacing - I prefer there to be action or suspense to push such a story forward, and this story failed to create that for me.
In general, an entertaining but not very impactful read for me.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Cannibalism, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Child abuse and Gun violence
Minor: Alcoholism and Animal death
unlivinh's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Child abuse, Death, Violence, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Moderate: Confinement, Gun violence, Medical content, Medical trauma, and Gaslighting
Minor: Alcoholism, Child death, Sexual content, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, and Fire/Fire injury
valreadssometimes's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
This book stuck with me to the point where I had to reread it. That doesn't happen to me often.
I think this book is so worth it because of its complex and very real characters, which are set in this bleak and dangerous world but do their best to stick to their own values and priorities.
The real magic of this book is that, despite the many wrongdoings by each person, none of them are truly the villain in this story. They are just each doing their best with what they have.
I think this book is so worth it because of its complex and very real characters, which are set in this bleak and dangerous world but do their best to stick to their own values and priorities.
The real magic of this book is that, despite the many wrongdoings by each person, none of them are truly the villain in this story. They are just each doing their best with what they have.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Death and Gore
Minor: Body horror
leahroyelle's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Death, Violence, and Medical content
Moderate: Animal death
simmonsj's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This is a zombie book, but unlike one I've read before. We follow mostly through Melanie's point of view, a kid who goes to school like most other kids except she's not like most other kids. And this isn't a school like other schools.
This is not an action packed book. It is more thoughtful and more literary than any other zombie book I've read. Lots of questions of humanity and science and how they intersect. Lots of pondering what the right thing to do is when confronted with humanity-altering scenarios. The plot starts off amazingly, giving us glimpses of this world mostly through Melanie's POV. We do also get POVs from a few other main/side characters to round out the world building and scope of the plot. Things start to slow down pretty quickly after a major event, and then the plot seems to wander without saying much. Hence the deduction of a star - I felt like not a lot happened in a long time. But again, this book wants to do something more than dole out action scenes. I really couldn't see how this could have a satisfying ending for 90% of the story, but at the very end we get a few scientific revelations that gave the ending a chance to make sense.
The writing feels more like literary fiction than a fantasy novel. Lots of poignant descriptions, metaphors, more flowery language for a dystopian novel than I would expect. Things are told in 3rd person throughout all POVs which took me out of an immersed experience and more like I was floating above watching it all happen. It worked well for this particular story. I listened to the audiobook, and the narrator, Finty Williams, had a nice English tone that fit the story rather well.
Overall, a very interesting take on the zombie and dystopian genres. Very literary and introspective. Few action scenes, little bit of science, and an ending that made sense even if it took a while to get there. But if you want a lot of action with your survival and zombies, this may not be the book you are looking for.
This is not an action packed book. It is more thoughtful and more literary than any other zombie book I've read. Lots of questions of humanity and science and how they intersect. Lots of pondering what the right thing to do is when confronted with humanity-altering scenarios. The plot starts off amazingly, giving us glimpses of this world mostly through Melanie's POV. We do also get POVs from a few other main/side characters to round out the world building and scope of the plot. Things start to slow down pretty quickly after a major event, and then the plot seems to wander without saying much. Hence the deduction of a star - I felt like not a lot happened in a long time. But again, this book wants to do something more than dole out action scenes. I really couldn't see how this could have a satisfying ending for 90% of the story, but at the very end we get a few scientific revelations that gave the ending a chance to make sense.
The writing feels more like literary fiction than a fantasy novel. Lots of poignant descriptions, metaphors, more flowery language for a dystopian novel than I would expect. Things are told in 3rd person throughout all POVs which took me out of an immersed experience and more like I was floating above watching it all happen. It worked well for this particular story. I listened to the audiobook, and the narrator, Finty Williams, had a nice English tone that fit the story rather well.
Overall, a very interesting take on the zombie and dystopian genres. Very literary and introspective. Few action scenes, little bit of science, and an ending that made sense even if it took a while to get there. But if you want a lot of action with your survival and zombies, this may not be the book you are looking for.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Death, Gore, Violence, and Pandemic/Epidemic
bigteo's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Well I mean, it was okay I guess.
After the strong start of the novel, it kinda slows down and becomes a fairly straightforward “characters go from A to B” zombie thriller. I thought that the medical themes were actually very well researched and interesting and definitely some of the strongest parts of the book for me.
None of the characters were really likeable for me. I kinda liked the soldier characters, they were okay and their actions were on the whole reasonable. The teacher character, Justineau, was actually incredibly fustrating to me. A good example is when she decides to set off the flare gun after Melanie is only gone for one night. Why didn’t she wait until they fixed the armoured lab/truck thing? Setting off the flare didn’t even get Melanie to come back faster, she came back the next morning as if nothing happened. And it had barely any consequence to the plot, but it just had me so angry that she acted so irrationally. Same goes for how violent she was with the doctor character. I didn’t care for the doctor but her motives at least kinda made sense. The characters are allowed to hate eachother that’s fine, but for example near the end (spoilers ahead) when the doctor is being chased by the pack of hungry kids, she could’ve explained that’s what had happened and it was self defence, plus she got a good intact brain to test on which could potentially save all of their lives. I don’t know. Just unlikeable characters that all, in turn, don’t like eachother. So therefore I didn’t like them all that much either.
As for the ending (spoiler warning obviously but I’ll try to be brief), it ended super abruptly. The wall of fungus was something introduced in the last couple of chapters. And the military guy Parks decides to burn it. I thought for sure they’d at least try and drive through it maybe? The silver lining to the ending that Melanie proposes seems more of an afterthought. Like, “burning it screwed up the whole world, oh well maybe good can come of it” and not something that the characters would have had to wrestle with beforehand. Maybe that conflict could have been more central, I don’t know. The world ending part kind of just happens in the last few pages without any buildup or conflict to the decision to burn the fungus wall.
I know this review seems very negative but on the whole it’s a very straightforward, interesting zombie apocalypse book. I guess if you’re a fan of the genre then this book isn’t exactly groundbreaking but it’s a fun enough read that I got through pretty quickly.
After the strong start of the novel, it kinda slows down and becomes a fairly straightforward “characters go from A to B” zombie thriller. I thought that the medical themes were actually very well researched and interesting and definitely some of the strongest parts of the book for me.
None of the characters were really likeable for me. I kinda liked the soldier characters, they were okay and their actions were on the whole reasonable. The teacher character, Justineau, was actually incredibly fustrating to me. A good example is when she decides to set off the flare gun after Melanie is only gone for one night. Why didn’t she wait until they fixed the armoured lab/truck thing? Setting off the flare didn’t even get Melanie to come back faster, she came back the next morning as if nothing happened. And it had barely any consequence to the plot, but it just had me so angry that she acted so irrationally. Same goes for how violent she was with the doctor character. I didn’t care for the doctor but her motives at least kinda made sense. The characters are allowed to hate eachother that’s fine, but for example near the end (spoilers ahead) when the doctor is being chased by the pack of hungry kids, she could’ve explained that’s what had happened and it was self defence, plus she got a good intact brain to test on which could potentially save all of their lives. I don’t know. Just unlikeable characters that all, in turn, don’t like eachother. So therefore I didn’t like them all that much either.
As for the ending (spoiler warning obviously but I’ll try to be brief), it ended super abruptly. The wall of fungus was something introduced in the last couple of chapters. And the military guy Parks decides to burn it. I thought for sure they’d at least try and drive through it maybe? The silver lining to the ending that Melanie proposes seems more of an afterthought. Like, “burning it screwed up the whole world, oh well maybe good can come of it” and not something that the characters would have had to wrestle with beforehand. Maybe that conflict could have been more central, I don’t know. The world ending part kind of just happens in the last few pages without any buildup or conflict to the decision to burn the fungus wall.
I know this review seems very negative but on the whole it’s a very straightforward, interesting zombie apocalypse book. I guess if you’re a fan of the genre then this book isn’t exactly groundbreaking but it’s a fun enough read that I got through pretty quickly.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child abuse, Child death, Confinement, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Cannibalism, Medical trauma, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcohol