marcelabrina's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

An editor's bible.

itshannahivy's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.75

rluck's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I hate her but I love her. A necessary evil.

lizardgoats's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Reading as an advanced assignment for the publishing institute:

pp: 3-109, 201-529, 619-649, 655-858.

kittyka0s's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

5.0

jselliot's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.0

It's a professional reference. Not exciting material, exactly, but it is necessary and useful. (And less irritating than the AP style guide putting out a new manual every two years like clockwork.)

mirel's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's a very useful book, but it takes time and practice to get used to it. I don't find it easy to navigate, but having read through it, it's getting easier.

lavina_l's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The serial comma is a beautiful, perfect thing. This book is nowhere near perfect, but there's nothing else like it.

stephgraves's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I don't think anyone really "reads" the Chicago Manual of Style, but I've sure referenced it a lot, and in depth.

nmcspadd's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Yes, I am this much of a nerd. I freaking love my CMS.