Reviews tagging 'Death of parent'

Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys

15 reviews

loxeletters's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

seanml's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

A very interesting look into the background of one of literature's most enduring novels. It's been a long time since I've read something with such trippy and intangible language. 7.5/10.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ejb44's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

 
Wide Sargossa Sea by Jean Rhys is an adaption of Charlotte Bronte’s infamous Jane Eyre, cantering itself on the ‘mad wife’ of Rochester. Through the little information readers were given regarding this character, Rhys managed to extrapolate it and create a backstory for this character, adding a postcolonial and feminist feel to the somewhat outdated narrative that is Jane Eyre. 

As a feminist and colonial historian, I was dying to read this book. I think the way Bronte dealt with mental illness in the book was expected for the time but obviously slightly negative and victim-blaming, again, understandably. The thought that Rhys might be able to spin the narrative on its head and give the ‘mad wife’, named Antoinette (and Bertha) in Rhys’ adaption, the perspective and respect she deserved. Sadly, I think the book failed to deliver exactly what the book aimed for. 

Firstly, the writing style is rather jarring, and I can’t seem to pinpoint why – it’s not colloquial, but its also not a smooth reading experience. It was often really difficult to figure out what was being said, and in the first 20 to 30% there was a multitude of characters introduced which confused me even more. It’s a shame because I think this is one of the main failings of the book as it feels like there’s a wall between the authors intentions and the reader. 

To add to this, the book didn’t deliver in what it said it would be – a postcolonial and feminist adaption. Perhaps because Rhys had to have her ending tied to what happens in Jane Eyre, it still didn’t feel like the mental health aspect was fully explored – we find out her mum was driven to madness because of the loss of her land and her son and then Antoinette seems to go mad within a matter of pages towards the end. This was a huge let down for me because I don’t think Antoinette ever really gains the appreciation she should. 

Following on from this, the way Rochester is written allows for more sympathy towards his character, which isn’t necessarily a bad point, but when paired with the fact that Antoinette’s mental healthy is never really fully fleshed out and explored in a way that makes the reader figure out what has happened to her rapidly declining mental health, the readers might find themselves sympathising with Rochester instead of Antoinette, whom in my eyes is the main orchestrator of her madness. Ultimately, because Rochester agrees to return to England with Antoinette, which by this point he is repeatedly calling her Bertha, her dead mothers name, we see him as not that bad of a guy because he would rather, she come back with him then leave her with an obeah, someone who engages in spiritual practice, either for evil or good. This just reinforces our idea that he isn’t too bad of a person. Also, when Rhys hints that he cheated on Rochester during her marriage, it all feels like an amalgamation to reduce Antoinette reliability as a character. 

The one thing I did love about the book was the Rashomon Effect, or the questioning of reliability amongst the characters. The fact that we hear from both Rochester’s and Antoinette perspective allows the reader to come to their own conclusions, even though it feels like Rhys has a strong hand in our views of the characters. This ‘unreliable narrator’ aspect was by far the most intriguing aspect of the book because it covered the span of the book and was actually fully formed. 

Overall, I think if you read Jane Eyre this might be an interesting short read just to see how culturally impactful the book is 200 years later, and the ever-growing shift in the importance of discussing mental health and marrying someone of a different country and culture to you. However, I think the writing let the book down massively, and the ending that I didn’t feel too comfortable with damped the overall experience. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

manarnia's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

This book was a very confusing and challenging read, but I appreciated the perspectives that it offered. 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ok7a's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings