Reviews tagging 'Gore'

The Call of the Wild Annotated by Jack London

7 reviews

amycam's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

laedyred's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0

I do not understand how this book is beloved. Am I missing something? It's full of racist, violent content that serves no other purpose than to say "the dog turned to its wolf roots". Cool? What's the comment on it, why should we care? It's boring but skimmable and I only bothered finishing it because it was short, hoping that I'd discover some profound idea hidden in the nonsense. I did not. I actively did not like this book, not even the writing could make up for it. Not worth the time to read.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

karolinaz's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

0.5

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mokiethe_dog34's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful inspiring reflective sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Beautifully written. Made me want to run off into a forest somewhere. (In a good way.)
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

scruffie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No
I'm beginning to feel that London revels in cruelty and has much respect for the "survival of the fittest". Don't get me wrong, Buck is a great dog, but it seems to me that London pays a lot of attention to ancestry, genes, and race (and, most importantly, discriminates on it). Now that I've read both White Fang and The Call of the Wild I don't think I'll be reading any more of his books; he really tips my racism sensor and I've been annoyed enough by this.

For what it's worth, I liked the ending.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

leandrathetbrzero's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

For the first four years of his life, Buck has lived comfortably alongside the Judge as the king of his own domain in the Southland. At the end of each day he curls up at the Judge’s feet by the fireplace. This blissful life is taken from him one night when Buck is stolen, sold, and moved up north to become a sled dog. He is introduced early to what he dubs “the law of club and fang” after being brutally beaten by the man in the red sweater. In the following years, Buck is sold multiple times, battles with other dogs to live another day, and the wild part of him – inherited from his long dead ancestors – is reawakened. This story is a brutal, heart-wrenching story of a dog who is too often equated to an object or commodity, and rarely as a fellow living creature. The Call of the Wild brought me to tears, and it does not surprise me that this book is a classic today.

Buck is such a compelling character to follow. The narration is third-person (or third-dog, in this case) limited, so the reader becomes well-acquainted with Buck’s thoughts and understanding of the world around him. I loved how London adapts his writing of imagery or society to fit the dog’s comprehension of it. For instance, California is called the Southland, Canada and Alaska are the Northland, and the brutal life of dog and master that Buck is introduced to becomes know as the law of club and fang, meaning that any man with a club must be obeyed. It pulls the reader further out of the prim and proper life of civilization, and it pushes us into the wilderness where the rules are far different. My heart ached for Buck as he slowly began to forget his old life, the one of comfort and trust, but I was grateful when he finally found John Thornton, the only master he truly loved.

While I am glad I read this book, I would say it is not for those highly sensitive to violence and mistreatment of animals, or anyone squeamish when reading about wounds or blood. I was very surprised by the many visceral scenes of violence. Many dogs perish in these pages, as do a few humans and other wildlife, but the dogs’ deaths were especially hard-hitting. The death match between Buck and rival Spitz was almost too much for me to read, and I cried at the death of Dave, a fellow sled dog of Buck since the beginning. I was quite upset during the scene where Buck’s brief time with the inexperienced family moving up north ended because I thought a few more dogs could have been saved, even though this led him to his life with John Thornton. As well done as The Call of the Wild is, I would not reread it willingly just because of the never-ending violence within its pages. An impactful book to read once! 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

madwoman13's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

0.25

  • Is this rating dramatic? I don’t care if it is. I hated this book . I have a special relationship with my dogs . They are very loved and are probably over fed (oops) . But let’s just say this book was not for me by any means. The first chapter opens with this gambler selling Buck , a half Saint Bernard , half german shepherd. To be a sled dog. It was slightly boring. And then these people starting beating him and whipping him and clubbing him . And the author was very descriptive in this abuse.  Did I also mention that these people starved him and deprived him of water . They also did this to the sled dogs. That was just the first chapter . And then dog fights . there are many descriptions of the fights . I depised all of it . And then they start getting grievously tired and start dying one by one . We finally get to one of my least favorite scenes ever . In this scene , Buck is lying on the floor so utterly exhausted and on the brink of death . This heinous man , proceeds to beat Buck in such a horrendous manner while he is dying. I loathed reading it . Then John saves him .  That was literally the only part of the book I liked . Because Buck deserved some kindness. But then the ending ruined for me . So basically there’s another animal fight which I forgot why it happened. After that fight , Buck is on his way home when he sees that a slaughter happened and one of the victims is John . I hated that. The only one that truly loved him dies . He then joins the wolf pack . Which I also didn’t like . Because it was just so violent and dark and I hated it . I am not saying this book is bad . I’m just saying I hated it. #spoilers 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings