Reviews with content warning for Blood - The Call of the Wild Annotated

Reviews tagging 'Blood'

The Call of the Wild Annotated by Jack London

18 reviews

tersirat's review against another edition

The plot point was getting too repetitive that it sort of dragged. I understood it heavily emphasized on "it's a tough world out here and only the strongest can survive" but just how many times do you need to repeat that?

Content Warnings

mokiethe_dog34's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful inspiring reflective sad tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Beautifully written. Made me want to run off into a forest somewhere. (In a good way.)

Content Warnings

scruffie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

I'm beginning to feel that London revels in cruelty and has much respect for the "survival of the fittest". Don't get me wrong, Buck is a great dog, but it seems to me that London pays a lot of attention to ancestry, genes, and race (and, most importantly, discriminates on it). Now that I've read both White Fang and The Call of the Wild I don't think I'll be reading any more of his books; he really tips my racism sensor and I've been annoyed enough by this.

For what it's worth, I liked the ending.

Content Warnings

oceanwriter's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0

I went into this blindly. I thought I knew what the plot was about but I was way off. Had I known, I don't think I would have picked it up. I have a very low tolerance for animal abuse and violence. I read on since this is a classic (and not a long one at that) hoping it would improve. I also don't like heavily accented writing because it messes with my brain and throws of the rhythm of my reading. My rating is solely on personal taste. I can see why it's a classic and while people like it, but I couldn't get past the gruesome content.

Content Warnings

leandrathetbrzero's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

For the first four years of his life, Buck has lived comfortably alongside the Judge as the king of his own domain in the Southland. At the end of each day he curls up at the Judge’s feet by the fireplace. This blissful life is taken from him one night when Buck is stolen, sold, and moved up north to become a sled dog. He is introduced early to what he dubs “the law of club and fang” after being brutally beaten by the man in the red sweater. In the following years, Buck is sold multiple times, battles with other dogs to live another day, and the wild part of him – inherited from his long dead ancestors – is reawakened. This story is a brutal, heart-wrenching story of a dog who is too often equated to an object or commodity, and rarely as a fellow living creature. The Call of the Wild brought me to tears, and it does not surprise me that this book is a classic today.

Buck is such a compelling character to follow. The narration is third-person (or third-dog, in this case) limited, so the reader becomes well-acquainted with Buck’s thoughts and understanding of the world around him. I loved how London adapts his writing of imagery or society to fit the dog’s comprehension of it. For instance, California is called the Southland, Canada and Alaska are the Northland, and the brutal life of dog and master that Buck is introduced to becomes know as the law of club and fang, meaning that any man with a club must be obeyed. It pulls the reader further out of the prim and proper life of civilization, and it pushes us into the wilderness where the rules are far different. My heart ached for Buck as he slowly began to forget his old life, the one of comfort and trust, but I was grateful when he finally found John Thornton, the only master he truly loved.

While I am glad I read this book, I would say it is not for those highly sensitive to violence and mistreatment of animals, or anyone squeamish when reading about wounds or blood. I was very surprised by the many visceral scenes of violence. Many dogs perish in these pages, as do a few humans and other wildlife, but the dogs’ deaths were especially hard-hitting. The death match between Buck and rival Spitz was almost too much for me to read, and I cried at the death of Dave, a fellow sled dog of Buck since the beginning. I was quite upset during the scene where Buck’s brief time with the inexperienced family moving up north ended because I thought a few more dogs could have been saved, even though this led him to his life with John Thornton. As well done as The Call of the Wild is, I would not reread it willingly just because of the never-ending violence within its pages. An impactful book to read once!

Content Warnings

garynoplastie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad tense medium-paced

Strong character development? Yes

3.75

Content Warnings

hermitcliffe's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Content Warnings

madwoman13's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

0.25

Is this rating dramatic? I don’t care if it is. I hated this book . I have a special relationship with my dogs . They are very loved and are probably over fed (oops) . But let’s just say this book was not for me by any means. The first chapter opens with this gambler selling Buck , a half Saint Bernard , half german shepherd. To be a sled dog. It was slightly boring. And then these people starting beating him and whipping him and clubbing him . And the author was very descriptive in this abuse. Did I also mention that these people starved him and deprived him of water . They also did this to the sled dogs. That was just the first chapter . And then dog fights . there are many descriptions of the fights . I depised all of it . And then they start getting grievously tired and start dying one by one . We finally get to one of my least favorite scenes ever . In this scene , Buck is lying on the floor so utterly exhausted and on the brink of death . This heinous man , proceeds to beat Buck in such a horrendous manner while he is dying. I loathed reading it . Then John saves him . That was literally the only part of the book I liked . Because Buck deserved some kindness. But then the ending ruined for me . So basically there’s another animal fight which I forgot why it happened. After that fight , Buck is on his way home when he sees that a slaughter happened and one of the victims is John . I hated that. The only one that truly loved him dies . He then joins the wolf pack . Which I also didn’t like . Because it was just so violent and dark and I hated it . I am not saying this book is bad . I’m just saying I hated it. #spoilers

Content Warnings

More...