Reviews

Pines by Blake Crouch

Only show reviews with written explanations

jordanb94's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

pixifirebolt's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I love a good old thriller. This one had me really quite confused at times (which is a good thing), but overall I'm feeling a little bit underwhelmed by Pines. I had an idea of the big reveal before it came. I hadn't worked out every aspect but I also didn't have a gasping OMG moment when everything was explained.

I feel like when the reveal came it went on for far too long and I just wanted to get back to the story. Only to find that it basically ended straight after the reveal. I suppose that this is the first book in what I think is a trilogy so this book may have been used for a bit of world building but I feel that all books, especially thrillers should be able to stand alone as a story even if they are not stand-alones.

The style of Blake Crouch's writing is very action oriented. It doesn't spend too much time on speech or description of the surroundings but focuses very much on everything that the main character, Ethan, did and felt. I quite enjoy this style as it leans towards more plot driven writing. However, in this book I got a bit fed up of being told exactly how each movement was made and how it felt to make it. It became tiresome and almost as tedious as when an author spends a whole page describing the colour of the sky.

I did enjoy this book overall, and I have bought the sequel. But I didn't by any means love it.

specificwonderland's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

I was trying to figure out why I was reading this book for most of the time I was reading it. It's fast-paced, urgently mysterious, and alpha male (not my usual search terms).

As the story drew to a close, I think I figured out how this book came into my orbit. Maybe 5-10y ago, I read a pair of really good books like this, fast-paced, almost Bourne Identity-like, with a mystery and sci-fi elements. The series was John Scalzi's Lock In (I think there were only 2 books, or maybe 2 and a prequel?). This book has similar flavoring: astute, shiny, male detective who is "on the case", mysterious science

in a dystopian society

, and a ticking clock device, in this case, figure it out before the town kills you.

Plot points I took issue with:

if his family was there, why didn't Pope or anyone bait him with that at the jump. Yo Ethan why are you struggling so hard to bail when Teresa and Ben are.....right here? And just Beverly's character in general (a nod to IT?)...she was trying to help him but no one at the bar knew her? Or did they just say they didn't know her? They didn't do a great job of keeping those 2 apart if Beverly was a threat to this utopia. Last thing I can think of, plot wise, only because I was a phlebotomist for almost 20y....when you get surgery in a normal hospital, they don't give you your sedative through a normal venipuncture, it's through your IV so they can also give you pain meds, saline, etc. I guess maybe the justification here I could give them is this wasn't a normal hospital, it was some Podunk half-staffed facility staffed by idiots who were barely online and working with limited equipment (although the reveal tells us the founder was a billionaire who spent "billions on r&d" so I would think they're not starving for supplies or staff).

Some of the phrasing was clunky and took me out of the narrative. One example was "She took out a glass, squirted water all over the ice." Is it just me? What a strange way to describe that, in the actual word selection and the phrasing/grammar. Another example was the writer describing the river noise, how it rushed by with a "purr". Um, what? Other than that, it definitely gave a Thin Blue Line, home of the free because of the brave, Toby Keith, xenophobic vibe and when I reached the end, I wasn't sure if the writer crafted this vibe for this book or if the writer's own traits were peeking through this "fiction". Either way, it put me off the rest of the series, but I think if you also enjoyed the Lock In series, this is another series to check out!

Update - I googled his author bio and fwiw his Wikipedia says he fought his wife for medical rights of their kids to vaccinate them, so he seems more lib than I picked up on in the book.

readinglibraesq's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense

Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No

4.5

Content Warnings

vrlewellen's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

This is not the type of book I typically read. It had more sci-fi elements than I was expecting. There was an element of mystery but over half the book seemed highly repetitive and there were many elements of torture. I have no interest in continuing the series.

Content Warnings