Reviews with content warning for Transphobia - Meddling Kids

Reviews tagging 'Transphobia'

Meddling Kids by Edgar Cantero

39 reviews

dfrancis's review against another edition

adventurous funny mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated

3.0

I enjoyed the book. I sped through it and read it in two days, It was a bit confusing at times, but still fun. I feel like the characters were kind of one-dimensional. I saw someone else’s review that said they could tell when reading that the lesbian romance was written by a man and that rings true to me. The romantic storyline felt childish and incomplete. There seems to be some transphobia here, mainly (that I noticed), in the beginning there is repeated mention of a “hermaphrodite” that is totally random. It is kind of alluded to that Andy is trans but at other times it seems clear that she is simply a lesbian, her characterization around those issues felt not completely fleshed out. Not the best, but a fun little ride.

Content Warnings

ash_ton's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Okay so. Originally I had given this book 4 stars but after thinking about it, I lowered it to 3. I couldn't get past a lot of things no matter how much I liked the actual story.

First, though, no matter how much I complain, I did like the book. I like the concept of the

talismans

even though I know that isn't a novel (haha) idea. I was still shocked and wasn't expecting

the kids to be part of the ritual.

I also wasn't expecting

Dunia Deboen to be involved, nor was I expecting her to be Damian Deboen.

Maybe in hindsight it should have been obvious but *shrugs*. So, despite the things I'm about to complain about, I did like the book because the story itself was good, in my opinion.

These are things I know others have talked about, so I'm just going to be another voice agreeing with them. The random insertion of the script format throughout the book wa sso jarring and unecessary. It did nothing for the storyline. If all the dialogue would have been in script format, sure. But that would've sucked and I would have hated it lol. In the same vein, I hated the amount of ridiculous "big" words added that seemingly were only there to beef up the sentences. Also, the made up words as well. Myriaphonic, as far as I can tell from googling, is not a real word. After some clicks, I found out a miraphone is a type of tuba, so maybe that's what he was going for? But like, bud. Pick something else.
The one random 4th wall break 75% into the book was also super jarring and unnecessary to me. If you're going to break the 4th wall, only doing it once isn't gonna cut it. Is the book self-aware or not?
My one last small gripe is how

Dunia/Damian spoke at the end. Like he was trying to be old but hip at the same time. No one, not even a 200 year old dude, is gonna talk that cringy and weird.

One last thing. I'm confused about the ending. I get that Tim is Sean's great-grandson. Fine. Makes sense. But

the spirit inhabiting Tim says he's been possessing all the dogs and that it got easier when Kerri was at college? And then the spirit makes Tim smile "bittersweetly" and says "It's all been done before." Bro wtf does that mean.

Idk if I'm just stupid, but I don't understand. I don't see anyone else mentioning that part.

Bottom line: I liked the book/story, I just mostly hated some of the writing style. Usually, I can get over that and in this case I did. I'd still recommend it, especially if you like Scooby Doo and/or retellings.

Content Warnings

danimacuk's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

Yikes. This took some serious motivation to get through. The story was okay, I guess, but really didn't deliver on what it was selling—that is, what happens to a Scooby-esque gang after they age out of the kid detective club? You might like this if you're a fan of (*cough* badly written *cough*) Lovecraftian horror (and don't mind some pretty poor character development and problematic themes).

TOPICS/SUBJECTS: Let's cut to the chase: this book has issues with how it talks about LGBTQIA+ subjects and characters. I first got an inkling of this when some character remarks bewilderment that another character didn't "transition" after her youth. All because the non-transitioning character was a tomboy.

Content Warnings

itsheyfay's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

amweber's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

Overall, I wanted to like this book much more than I did. The writing was jarring at times, but the more I read the more problematic it became. First off, if you’re looking for an edgy Scooby Doo that is way better than Velma, this isn’t it. Some research revealed that the author actually wanted to parallel the Famous Five by Enid Blyton, but his publishers didn’t know who that was. So he pivoted to Scooby Doo and I feel like it shows in his writing. The end result is a book that feels badly forced into a box for the sake of marketing.

There’s a ton of problematic stuff in this book that I detail in the spoiler tag.

Speaking of, Kerri and Andy’s relationship seems painfully one-sided. It kind of reminded me of that movie, Kissing Jessica Stein. Kerrie doesn’t seem to be attracted to Andy and it makes Andy seem almost predatory at times. I hate this because if this book had been written as Daphne and Velma actually falling in love I would have been SO into it. The predatory lesbian is also such a harmful stereotype.

And some trigger warnings: Kerri seems to be an alcoholic and Nate has hallucinations and has been in and out of treatment for his mental health. Both of these things seem to disappear by the end of the book after the Mystery that Haunts them is resolved. The character development throughout is very surface-level so I never really felt like I was in their heads to begin with, but that kind of fast resolution is not how this works.

The character of Dunia feels incredibly transphobic. She’s the villain we spend the most time with, as the giant Lovecraftian god doesn’t exactly speak. She is immortal and changes her gender to better disguise herself in the town, perpetuating the stereotype that trans people are tricky and deceptive. When the Blyton Summer Detective Club were kids, the villain was always a guy in a mask, so equating that with a trans identity is deeply troubling. She also claims that changing her gender was a simple and easy thing to accomplish…in the 90s. At one point she looks at Andy and says she should talk to her doctor and look into it. Transitioning is obviously much more complicated than that and can put trans people in real danger.

There’s also a racial slur in the book that is typically directed at Mexican people who enter the US. It comes out of nowhere. Now—Edgar Cantero is Spanish and there are a lot of complicated dynamics between Spanish people and Mexican people, such as colonialism, colorism, and anti-Mexican sentiment. The casual inclusion of the slur, even if its inclusion is Nate noting that their bully used to call Andy that, feel so jarring and unearned.

Additionally, the team essentially figures out who the Lovecraftian god is through a recitation of a legend from the area. It feels like an Indigenous legend is just being used as a plot point here to move the story along and this, combined with all the other problematic stuff I mentioned, really hurt my enjoyment of the book.

I wanted my first review here to be a more positive experience, but I ultimately cannot recommend this one.

Content Warnings

faeriviera's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

2.5

I was REALLY enjoying this book, but then the final twist happened.

After all the build up that made it seem like somehow their dead friend was behind it all, we find out it was an author they had befriended along their journey, and she was in fact someone who had a sex change surgery to hide her original identity. Considering how queer friendly they seemed to be trying to be with the main couple, the sudden turn into transphobia was really jarring, and also the twist felt like it was just there for the sake of there being a twist

It was really disappointing because I loved the idea of what was essentially Scooby Doo meets Stephen King's It, ESPECIALLY given the build up to a sapphic romance, but a bad ending can truly ruin a story for me.

Content Warnings

emsim's review against another edition

Go to review page

nope. this book is already handling gender, sexuality, and mental health poorly in the first 10%.

Content Warnings

wooter42's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Content Warnings

chloe_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

This book had a really solid mystery at its core but fell down on quite a few elements of its execution. Others have brought up most of my comments - the variable quality of the writing (including experimentation with breaking that fourth wall and script format which didn't really pay off), the repeated focus on one of the character's red hair and some very shaky handling of queer and native american content.

Content Warnings

marykendrick666_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

Content Warnings

More...