Reviews

De Viruscode by James Dashner

parlonny's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional funny sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

The prequel we all needed.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jordongreene's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I love prequels, and this one was no exception. Getting to see the events leading up to Dashner's The Maze Runner trilogy was so great. It answered all of my questions and made me even more mad at WICKED. When I finished I was on such a high, so excited and angry all at the same time. It's a great end to the series!

elinorprodger's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

kupids's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

oh my god. oh. my. god. the subtle twists? the reveals? the betrayals? i'm in awe. this was the perfect ending to a perfect series. 

mpguzman's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

IM SHOOK but I LOVE it

dally119's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

hollydaisy23's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.0

egbella's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I'm currently re-reading these books, and in chronological order this time, instead of the order they were released. After the Kill Order (which I didn't like as much as I remembered), comes this one, and I was pleasantly surprised!

Pros:
~ I just like prequel stories. They can definitely mess stuff up if not done well, but I felt The Fever Code was pretty good about staying true to the original books while still offering valuable backstory.
~ Getting to see the main characters (Thomas, Teresa, Aris, Newt, Minho, Alby, Chuck, Gally, etc.) before their Maze adventures. Their personalities felt very consistent with the later books. And I liked Thomas and Teresa's characters a lot more after seeing them in this book. I was never very fond of either of them in the rest of the books.
~ The depth and backstory of the people working at WICKED. I found Dr. Paige's character development particularly fascinating. The contradictions in her actions between her love for the kids and her passion to find a cure no matter what the cost, seemed very human and made me appreciate her character more. Even if I despised her by the end.
~ As a whole, the entire portrayal of what WICKED did to try and find a cure. I often stopped and wondered what I would do in that situation, and it drew some thought-provoking questions. How much can be justified in pursuit of a final good? How do you even determine what is good? There was a constant back and forth of both selflessness and selfishness that gave depth and realism to the themes.
~Good intrigue and suspense, and many times that I couldn't quite tell what was going to happen next the first time I read it. Even re-reading it, the balance of foreshadowing and secrets was good.
~ Thomas 'forgetting' his real name. That sequence was well-done.
~ Newt's snippet of backstory at the beginning (and his family relationship with Lizzy)
~ In general, most of the things I liked about this book were because of the very nature of a prequel. I enjoyed all the tie-ins to the rest of the books, and the clues laid for the rest of the story. The explanations for things that happened later were neat to see. I enjoyed them.

Cons:
~ Parts of the prose itself seemed pretty amateurish. Not quite sure why, but there were several places that pulled me out of the story as the writer in me thought, "wow, that's a lot of 'telling'", or "that probably could have been worded better." I thought some parts could have been trimmed.
~ Thomas and Teresa's thoughts and actions when they were young. I get that they're supposed to be incredibly smart, but most of the things they said and did felt way older than they were said to be. I would never have pegged Thomas at almost 5 near the start of the book.
~ Not necessarily a con because I think I'm just being slow, haha, but I still don't know whether it was Teresa or Dr. Paige that wrote the final memorandum to the staff at the end of the book. Also, after reading the Maze Runner book, either I'm missing something else or there's an inconsistency:
Spoiler In the memorandum mentioned above, it's claimed that Teresa's going to write 'WICKED is good' on her arm before her memory is wiped, but after she enters the Maze in Maze Runner, then she tells Thomas that she wrote it down in waking moments between feverish dreams.

~ Like the rest of the books, a bit more usage of language (including 'made-up') than I'd like.
~ I'm not sure what to think about Thomas and his friends being able to sneak all over the place. I suppose it makes sense if WICKED was willing to let them do some things just to monitor them, but some things they did felt way too easy to get away with. Including them getting outside.

Overall, I know prequels tend to get a lot of grief, but I enjoyed this one quite a bit. I thought it was pretty well-written and most of all, I enjoyed the explanations, character development, and tie-ins to the rest of the series.

safi_thedragon's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

“She came over to him, leaned in to whisper in his ear. “This is so important,” she said. “The most important thing in the world.”
“Yeah,” he breathed. “Because WICKED is good.”


As expected, this book didn’t have much of a storyline since we know how this is going to end, but despite this, it was still a more gripping read than expected, and I was planning to give it four stars until the end - I’ll get why I didn’t later.


*What I liked*

I was worried this book would just be a jumble of character backstory and unnecessary plot in an attempt to recreate the old hype of the original trilogy, but I was pleasantly surprised - this book was well planned and integrated, and brought value to the others.

This is down to the portrayal of Thomas’ role in WICKED. As a reader, you sympathise with the protagonist - as readers we hated WICKED in the Maze Runner and hated that Teresa sympathised with them. But Fever Code shows us that, for the most part, WICKED really does want to find a cure, and you’re almost brainwashed alongside Thomas into thinking “WICKED is good”. This brings a whole new perspective to events in the other books like the Gladers’ reaction to Thomas helping build the maze, because you understand why he did it.

This book also answers questions you didn’t know you had. Like why did they take Newt if he isn’t immune? Why does the Flare exist? Why did Ben go absolutely feral after the changing?? Why don’t the gladers climb the damn ivy that clearly goes to the top??? Sure these might have just been plot hole fillers, but they did indeed fill the plot holes so you can’t really complain.

Mild spoiler: it ends with the exact words that The Maze Runner starts with. Chefs kiss

kutterek's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

If you've read the Maze Runner trilogy, you'll need to read this book. It gives more depth into what was occurring behind the scenes in preparation for the process of trials for the gladers. And, just like the other books, you'll continue to find yourself asking, "Is WICKED good?"