The design and UX isn't done, Rob and Abbie, okkurrrr! đ
stefhyena's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.75
The poetry...well to be fair I read it in translation. A good and careful translation which explained some of the scansion and other decisions that were kept in, as well as why the rhyme was not. The notes were invaluable for actually understanding some of this nonsense. But apart from the offensively bad theology (to be fair probably normal in his day) and his obvious self-aggrandisement throughout (there's been a good meme on this which turns out to have been exact) the pace is very slow and tedious. I forced myself to read 2 cantos a day over many months. I do want to learn what is great poetry and to be a better poet myself and this is meant to be one of the best.
From the perspective of old white men who like empires I guess...
Graphic: Child death, Classism, Colonisation, Death, Violence, War, Blood, Bullying, Suicide, Torture, Ableism, Genocide, Murder, Police brutality, Body horror, Cannibalism, Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, Hate crime, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Racism, Religious bigotry, Sexism, and Slavery
tienno22's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Death, Torture, and Violence
jo_lzr's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Body horror, Fire/Fire injury, Gore, Injury/Injury detail, Medical trauma, Physical abuse, Torture, and Violence
fsb95's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
In fairness to Dante, it is probably more readable in the original, because there, the poetic merit probably compensates a good deal for the tiresome self-indulgence of the author. I attempted to read this book because of the tremendous impact it has had on Western culture and tropes, and admittedly Danteâs world-building is probably on par with someone like Tolkien.Â
Having been pleasantly surprised by âCandideâ just before I started this, I expected more of the same - a gripping read. But the âComedyâ in the title misleads - though of course it does contain elements of satire and humour (much of which just wasnât that funny to me), it is more comparable to a religious text, which of course in a sense it is.
At least to the modern reader, it isnât something you can really just read, itâs a book you would need to study and interpret. I constantly found myself referring to the notes section, and I learnt lots of things about late mediaeval Italy in general, and Danteâs life in particular. Which I wouldnât have minded had that been what I had set out to do, but it wasnât. I was looking to read for pleasure, not learning. Of course, with some books you can do both, but for me this just wasnât one of them.
In summary: Unless youâre already intimately familiar with both Danteâs biography and this particular period of Italian history, this is not a book you can really read for pleasure. If you do want to learn about that though, and donât mind âstudyingâ this book rather than simply reading it in a leisurely way, then Iâd really recommend it. If not, youâre better off just reading the Cliffs Notes summary of each canto.
Graphic: Gore, Excrement, Death, Homophobia, Confinement, Body horror, Blood, Sexual content, War, Religious bigotry, and Violence