Reviews tagging 'Sexual assault'

It by Stephen King

75 reviews

julells's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Ein fesselndes, geniales und verstörendes Buch, das mir an einigen Stellen doch schon fast ein bisschen zu viel war.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

evaku's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

at last, the beast has been conquered!
i can’t believe that some years ago, i somehow managed to read this within a span of one week. crazy!
there’s a reason why It is hailed as one of Stephen King’s best. his insanely detailed exposition and exploration of each character’s individual lives and their relationships with one another is something unlike anything i’ve seen in other written works. perhaps to a fault, as i think we could’ve done without so much information (sorry King.) as much as it’s praised though, i think there is A LOT of room for valid criticism. whether you chalk it up to the era in which it was written (or in which the story takes place) or his drug-addled mind, the language (aka the slurs, of which there are multiple), incessant sexual innuendos and sexual scenarios (chapter 22 i'm looking at you), and others... take up so much of the story it almost ruins it.
if half of the time dedicated to fleshing out background characters like Patrick Hockstetter was instead used to dive into the clown known as Pennywise, you'd have a terrifyingly better 1000-page (or 45 hour) story on your hands.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

directorpurry's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

This book is actually immensely sad and I need to lie down for a while. It also could have been shorter and less racist and antisemitic. But it was immensely compelling - there was absolutely no point where I considered putting it down.
I had a really excellent time comparing the overlap of Dark Tower and IT, thinking about all the Easter eggs and crossovers that I've already read about or seen in King books and adaptations. My favorite part of this experience was honestly slotting in a new piece of the SK puzzle.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lordchampion666's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

I wanted so badly to like this book more than I did. It has moments and even whole sections that are peak King, raw emotional, intense, and vividly horrifying. The depictions of how It presents itself to the characters are perfect. However, there are three main issues that I have with the book, which are length, pacing, and sex. The book does not need to be more than 1,100 pages long. So many times do we go back to the Barrens with the Losers Club just being kids or remembering ways that Henry tormented them. After the first two or three visits back, I found myself wanting to move on because nothing new was being shared, and my opinions of the characters were not being fleshed out. There is a lot of content, and covering two periods in time does require a large book, but I think it would have been more impactful at 700 pages, which is still a monumental length. The pacing is very inconsistent with the more mundane aspects of their lives, getting a shocking amount of detail and then final confrontations and completions of B and C plots happening in a flash. This felt very jarring and left me feeling unfulfilled with the resolution some characters received. Finally, the biggest reason this book was not rated higher is the amount of unnecessary sex in the book. Sweet moments that could be just that are ruined by a sudden crotch grab or description of a "gleeful erection." Characters that are very clearly villains have a subtext of desired molestation added, which is viscerally unpleasant but isn't needed. The worst offender of this by far is the infamous scene in which six preteen boys run a train on their friend to prove their love for each other. This was the first time that I have ever skipped a portion of a book. I am fully in support of graphic content in media when it is justified. Nothing about this scene was justified because moments later, they have a more connected and loving moment when they make the blood pact to return should It still be alive. King proved that he can write an impactful unification of characters without a child orgy so the inclusion of it after editors and publishers got their hands on the book baffles me. This is a nearly perfect horror book that is dragged into mediocrity by a bloated length and grotesque depictions of children battling with the first confusing emotions of attraction, friendship, and shared trauma. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fuerdeinestadt's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

charmarie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional funny tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

wondawilson's review against another edition

Go to review page

0.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kchamberlin04's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

stephen king writes such beautiful things about friendship. unfortunately he also writes graphic misogynistic underage sex scenes so

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

boooooooooooooooooooooook's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

Very good story telling and quality of writing, just very long!!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

neleusb's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

audiobook with stephen weber is FANTASTIC, absolutely hard to get through some parts content wise, i was spoiled going in and still cringed at all that stephen king had to say
the tom shit in its entirety and the INTENSE sex scene with the kids at the end
and
the spiritual alien eternal pain in my ass twist with finding out what pennywise IS, and it is a she and SHES PREGNANT, and sorry a turtle made the universe and gave bill a pep talk to kill a clown like what was that
. absolutely gripping

Expand filter menu Content Warnings