Reviews

The Golden Bough: Abridged Edition by James Frazer

sba_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

2.0

Read it if you’re curious but it’s a massively aged book that hasn’t aged well at all. Wow. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jcampbell's review

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

Lengthy and weighty, and I read an abridged version. I can see why this was so controversial when it was published in the Victorian era, an interesting comparative study of world believes and religion. 

cazxxx's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring slow-paced

3.5

kheleesi's review against another edition

Go to review page

Reading slowly for research. Didn’t want to track.

onetrueceyton's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Flawed but fascinating

strangeglyph's review against another edition

Go to review page

More of a reference work than something that can be read front to back

0hn0myt0rah's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

NERD

zmb's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The theorizing is fascinating, and, while the abridgment does a good job at cutting down the interminable examples of the full third edition, there are still a huge amount of them. Nevertheless, it's worth it for Frazier's unifying explanations. If they occasionally (or often) go to far in the direction of unification, they are the more interesting for it.

shiradest's review against another edition

Go to review page

I recall reading this book quite a few years ago, when I was a new Wiccan. I recall thinking that it had rehashed just enough mythology to be annoying, but not especially revealing, so I did not take notes on it. I suppose I shall have to read it again.

jcovey's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

For most books I consider abridgment a crime, but with this one I really wish I'd gone for a 'Selection from.' The ideas and theories Frazer expounds are compelling and rather convincing, but these theories are probably about 15% of the text. The rest is the seemingly endless evidence he gathered for these theories. His list of sources is a full third of the books length. It's an admirable amount of research, but the casual reader will not get much out of the detailed descriptions of harvest festivals from nearly every peasant population in Europe, especially because they are all so nearly alike that they almost instantly begin to blend together in the readers mind.