Reviews with content warning for Forced institutionalization - The Southern Book Club's Guide to Slaying Vampires

4.5/5 stars after sleeping on it. I highly advise any readers who might be sensitive to certain topics to check out a complete list of trigger warnings for this book. There are quite a few, some of which I will mention below in my review.
----------------------------------
Okay, so let me start by saying that horror isn’t really my genre unless it is a supernatural style of horror, which this one is. The main baddie is a vampire, as the book title suggests. You get a clue from the beginning who the vampire is, but up until you first see him feeding on someone, you’re under the impression that he is like other vampires you’ve read about. He’s not. Honestly, he’s way more disturbing. There’s nothing sexy about him.

In addition to the supernatural horror elements, there were just some good, old-fashioned regular horror elements, like body horror and animal/insect horror. And then there were other oft-used horror elements that I just really hate as a reader, but I’ll get to those later.

What I liked:

Pacing: I was engaged in this story immediately, and that engagement carried me consistently throughout the narrative. There wasn’t any point at which I was bored with what was happening, and I constantly had a feeling of unease, like SOMETHING is going to happen. It spans several years, and the time skips made sense for the trajectory of the story.

The Use of Horror Elements: Even those horror elements that I don’t particularly enjoy served a meaningful purpose in this, and Hendrix did a good job of weaving them in to ratchet up the tension. His descriptions of the animal/insect horror are absolutely disgusting, and more than once I felt like bugs were on me because of the way he described a particular scene in the novel (even talking about it makes me itch!). There is a scene of dismemberment that is also particularly graphic, but in a really satisfying way. And then, of course, the vampire scenes were definitely uncomfortable to witness.

The Use of the Time Period: So this story takes place in the 90s, and in case anyone was unaware, things weren’t all that great for women or minorities in the south in the 90s. (They’re not much better today, either, but I digress.) The men in this story are the true villains, and I made a lot of angry noises while reading that caused my husband to ask if I was okay. Lol. I told him I hated every man in the book, and he laughed and said “oh goody” because he’s going to read it soon and also hate every man in the story.

I can hang my hatred on a hook and admit that even though the way the men treated their wives in this made me violently angry, it was realistic, and it made me even more invested in what the eventual outcome would be. But I warn you – as a woman who has experienced gas-lighting, it was not easy to read some of those moments because it was very intense and infuriating. The way in which the MC, Patricia, was treated and infantilized by her husband on page was enough to make my blood boil.

Apart from the misogyny, the lack of cell phones and the ability to use the internet were also features of the story that worked well because it caused the main character to have to get a little bit creative by modern standards when researching her potentially vampiric community member.
The Community of Women: This book, with all of its chauvinistic male characters and paternalistic societal standards, shows a group of women coming together in the face of the very real male threats in their community. The women are all part of a book club, as evidenced by the title, and they help one another in that way that only those familiar with southern hospitality can truly appreciate. This even crosses ethnic lines, with white and black women working together for a common good, but there ARE some issues that can be taken with the portrayal of certain races in the novel, and how they are treated by the characters in power.

What I Didn’t Like:

Rape and SA/CSA: These are the reason why I struggle so much with reading horror, particularly horror written by men. Women can be horrified and broken by their experiences without resorting to the rape trope. There are also some instances that could be construed as sexual assault or child sexual assault, but it is a bit complicated. I’ll wrap the explanation in spoiler tags if the context can inform whether you want to read it or not. (view spoiler)

Nazi Symbolism: There is a character in the book who is weirdly obsessed with Hitler, Nazis, and the Holocaust, almost in a sympathizing way, and I got so tired of reading about it. After finishing the novel, I truly don’t know the point of it, other than to possibly make the character generally unsympathetic in the eyes of the reader. This character is also close to another character, who entertains the talk of Nazis with them, and I think it lends a general “ick” feeling to both of them. But there were several other ways this could have been done, and it just didn’t seem necessary to include. It’s also never really addressed in any meaningful way.

What I Wasn’t Sure About:

The Handling of Racism: So, given that this book is set in the 90s, there are unfortunately some realistic depictions of the socioeconomic disparities between whites and blacks in the south, and the way in which those in the Black communities are obviously stigmatized and valued far less than the White ones. One of the main characters in the story is a Black woman who lives in a poor, predominantly Black neighborhood called Six Mile, and she works as a cleaning lady employed by one of the White families in the Old Village, where Patricia (our MC) and the other White families live. She eventually works for Patricia’s family and becomes involved in the horrific happenings occurring in both places. She deals with so much casual racism from the White folks in the story, and in spite of it all, she does her best to help when they need it (and they usually do need it because they are inept). There are several moments where Patricia could be perceived as being a White savior, but it also read a lot like trying to get her white counterparts to see the Black children in Six Mile as having equal importance to their own White children, since they are obviously the type that wouldn’t care about the same message from a Black mother.

As a White person myself, I do think that Hendrix handled the interactions realistically for the setting and time period. I don’t think that he overdid it or painted the Black characters in an overly negative light. In fact, the White female characters are intentionally portrayed as spineless or cowardly, or too afraid to upset their perfect little lives to do the right thing, and looked upon with derision by others for their behavior. The White male characters are controlling, misogynistic, and view their women as ignorant ninnies. Truly, the Black characters were the only sympathetic characters to me, their uneasiness about Patricia and her friend visiting their neighborhood made perfect sense, especially when considering that a White man called “Boo Daddy” had been taking their children in to the woods and hurting them. Their hesitance to call the police was also completely understandable because it hints that the police take their time to get out there, when their response time to the Old Village is 3 minutes. I appreciated that Hendrix didn’t have any white characters use the “n” word or use pejoratives when referring to anyone in Six Mile , but he did illustrate an obvious “us vs. them” mentality amongst the two communities, which I do think would have also fit the setting and time period.

Obviously, my interpretation of the way he handles this is by no means the correct one, and those who read my review should take it with a grain of salt. I’d love to hear more or be linked to Black reviewers specifically who have read the book and shared their thoughts on it all. Those are the opinions that matter most.

Overall, in spite of some personal triggers to the content in the book, it was a fast-paced and well-written horror novel that purposefully examined racism and sexism, as well as kept me engaged. Plus it was legitimately creepy. Not much more I can ask for, tbh.

Content Warnings

huldasif's review

Go to review page

dark funny lighthearted mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

This book is kind of like The Stepford Wives meets Salem's Lot meets Fried Green Tomatoes, but it was funnier. The first chapter was hilarious in fact. I was laughing my head off, it was so funny. I was a little disappointed the book didn't continue on like that, but the book was still good. It became less funny as the horror built up, naturally. It would have been too much of a reprieve and taken away the suspense if it had kept on being so funny I guess. Plus, it just doesn't do to be laughing while children are dying on the next page. It was more creepy than scary though. The husbands were just as creepy as the vampire actually, which I thought was pretty clever of the author. I almost wanted to do them off too, they made me so mad. I'll definitely be reading My Best Friend's Exorcism too! But I sure hope Grady Hendrix writes a comedy if she hasn't already, because she is the funniest writer I ever came across. That first chapter was the best.

Content Warnings

tonyanicole's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No

1.5

Content Warnings

rachelunabridged's review

Go to review page

dark funny mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

So excited to finally find a Grady Hendrix book that worked for me! I had such a fun time with this read. As someone born and raised in the south, I feel like I've met every single one of the women in this story (and their husbands, unfortunately) before so I thought the characterization was hilariously on point in a lot of ways. I also really liked what Hendrix did with the social commentary in this book. There was a lot of subtle domestic abuse + subtle racism in this story that I thought was very well handled + offered a very nuanced look at these issues + how insidious they can be. Toward the end, I felt like he got kind of ham-fisted with his portrayal of the antagonist, which is one of my biggest complaints about this author; however, it wasn't as distracting in this book as in some of his others so I was able to more or less shrug it off.
All told I really, really enjoyed this read + the narration in the audiobook was fantastic! Would recommend!

Content Warnings

aezlo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

This book was intensely visual and grossly visceral for me, which may be an intrigue if you're into horror and gore and the rest. I still think about it occasionally, many months later, but I sort of wish I hadn't read it due to some of the content.

It's well written, but drags through the second half and could have done with editing out one of the tease and thrill arcs and just cutting to the build up and climax already.

Essentially a dead dove situation here. If this is your poison, it's not a bad go, but horror usually isn't my bag and I foolishly listened to a friend who insisted it wasn't that bad!! and it was funny/entertaining, which it at least is, but not something I would have ever chosen for myself.

Content Warnings

navisti's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

I thought this book had been published in the early 2000s. Once I finished it, I found it came out in 2020.

I'm honestly flabbergasted as to how this story was published in 2020.

I get that the blatant sexism and misogyny couldn't be edited out of the story because of when it is set, but there was still so much that should not have gotten approval for publication.

The only reason this is not a 1 star review is because of how evoking the writing in the horror and shock scenes was.

Content Warnings

aseel_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

I was captivated by the plot of this book, the writing was so good. I really liked the characters and I am glad about how it ended (wish some people died though). Will say, it is horrifyingly graphic for certain parts, would not recommend reading if you have a light stomach.

Content Warnings

More...