Scan barcode
nikhocharm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Addiction, Child death, Death, Drug abuse, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Grief, Pregnancy, and Abandonment
daniofthewood's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Ableism, Addiction, Child death, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Grief, Murder, Pregnancy, Abandonment, and Classism
Minor: Cancer
mondovertigo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Addiction, Animal death, Child death, Death, Drug abuse, Misogyny, Grief, Pregnancy, and Abandonment
Moderate: Racism
Minor: Cancer and Infertility
chhof002's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Child death and Racism
Moderate: Misogyny, Abortion, and Pregnancy
sskinner155's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, and Misogyny
Moderate: Drug use and Violence
clemrain's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
I want to write a review for this novel, but an analytical essay is coming to me much stronger than my thoughts on what I liked and disliked. It’s a rich read.
The characters in this novel are strong. All fully complicated, dimensional, and show growth in some form. Which is a great achievement for a novel full of this many characters.
The novel mainly follow’s Li-yan. Some of the story also gives us tidbits of Yan-Yeh all of which I thought were clever and proved the need for them effectively.
Li-yan is a beautiful character. Her entire life flowed so effortlessly from the pages to me. I felt as if I were with her every step of her life in this book.
Motherhood as a concept was sincere and flowed from So-sa, to Li-yan to Yan-yeh. I like that Akha men recited thier lineage, and this novel captured the linage of the Akha women. The men have the names of their father, and the women had their story.
Lisa See had a whole website dedicated to the research she’s done for this book. It’s mainly pictures and videos. I’m not sure about the depth of the research but See has spent time on it. This isn’t a textbook, but I think it’s a beautiful introduction to the history of tea and Akha people. I thought See was respectful in presenting the ideas of something that isn’t western. Nothing stood out to me as the author looking down on the Akha traditions.
San-pa was cursed with a horrible death and got one. San-pa and Li-yan were born in days that made their marriage difficult, and even changing the days of thier birth they still had a difficult marriage. These little things could’ve gone any other way, to say “look, see how stupid their beliefs are?” But none of that happened. I was scared of the author contributing to the colonization of the Akha people. But that never happened. Which is amazing.
Ont thing that always took me out of the story was Li-yan’s vocabulary. Sometimes, it felt too modern and didn’t fit in with the rest of her sentence structures. I remember Li-yan mentioning superstition to refer to some of her cultural ideas and I was confused. We hadn’t been introduced to her going to school at the point. And Li-yan was critical of the colonist teaching in her school so I wasn’t sure why she would use the word superstition. This is just one example that comes to mind. Maybe I read too much into it, but I was taken out of the experience.
The story inched slowly and it took me a while to be invested in it. But by part two I can say it was very difficult for me to put down this book. I do think some parts really dragged on and could’ve been condensed but because so much of it is Li-yan’s thoughts, I was fine with some of the on going paragraphs. Li-yan is constantly fighting with herself, with her culture, with her education and with her happiness. I liked reading these thoughts, it just made Li-yan a good main character.
Good ending. I shed a tear. It was so impactful and abrupt. Well executed.
I have a lot more to say but they’re full of spoilers and my thoughts are very muddled. But all that is to say I will be thinking about this book for a long time.
Graphic: Child death and Death
Moderate: Addiction, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Emotional abuse, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, and Pregnancy
Minor: Bullying, Cancer, Child abuse, Drug abuse, Drug use, and Racism
nannahnannah's review against another edition
I actually picked this up because of all the information about how tea is picked, made, brewed, etc., so I knew what I was getting into there. Unfortunately I had no idea (and no warning!) about the novel’s horrific ableism or its condescending and strange attitude toward the Akha people.
I’ll get the ableism over with first, because it’s the easiest to address. I’m always reminded how much we really need to add content warnings to the beginning of books (like we do to movies, video games, etc.), here especially because within the first 30 pages I was thrown into an intense anxiety attack. Granted, the ableism is in-book and obviously not Lisa See’s views, but reading things like, “If human rejects [disabled people or twins] are allowed to do the intercourse, over time an entire village might end up inhabited by only them,” and reading characters learn how disabled babies must be murdered (and the parents banished and their home burned) really does a number on my self worth. No, this is not necessarily a critique of the book. I’m mentioning in case anyone else who needs this warning can maybe see it.
But the quote I used brings me to my second point. Lisa See is Chinese-American, but as far as I know, she isn’t Akhan, an ethnic minority group in China. She may have researched a lot, and that comes through in her writing, but so does a really strange attitude toward the Akha. Why is their dialogue so stilted, when, flipping through the rest of the book, the dialogue by American people and even the MC after she emigrates to America obviously doesn’t match?
It’s also … hard to explain, but there’s an attitude pervasive through her writing that paints the Akha as such a backward, almost barbaric people with such obvious distaste that it’s really uncomfortable to read. I'm not Chinese, though, so I may be getting this all wrong. And I’m not sure if this attitude changes, but I’m just not ready to read nearly four hundred pages of it.
Graphic: Ableism and Misogyny
also: infanticide