Scan barcode
A review by sympetal
The Reader by Bernhard Schlink
dark
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I liked how clearly the emotional consequences within the main character, created by the events of his teenage years, rippled through his entire life until it was made abundantly clear just how fucked up that one short chapter in his life made him.
He became the reader, it defined him to the point where there was no space for anyone or anything else in his life. Clearly the author knows how to tell, and not show, since not much was explicitly said, but I still got that sense of emptiness and barrenness within the soul of someone who had been taken advantage of, yet couldn't recognise it as such because they were robbed of the tools needed for that recognition in the first place.
We only get the sense that something is wrong through the reactions of others, though we know it must be. And though there's no character development, everything is in stasis, it's crystallized into a state of absolutely no movement, we still get a clear picture of the character and who he is, all that he lacks, and his desire to hold onto the only thing that gave him meaning. Without accepting that he can define himself by something else.
There is a question asked by another character at the end of the book. They ask him whether he knows if what was done to him was done with awareness, and he cannot answer. He doesn't know if the one thing he devoted his entire emotional life to was just a side-story in another person's life. And we don't know either.
I liked that complexity, and the resigned way it ends. There's no other way for it to be - our main character doesn't know how to feel anything else.
He became the reader, it defined him to the point where there was no space for anyone or anything else in his life. Clearly the author knows how to tell, and not show, since not much was explicitly said, but I still got that sense of emptiness and barrenness within the soul of someone who had been taken advantage of, yet couldn't recognise it as such because they were robbed of the tools needed for that recognition in the first place.
We only get the sense that something is wrong through the reactions of others, though we know it must be. And though there's no character development, everything is in stasis, it's crystallized into a state of absolutely no movement, we still get a clear picture of the character and who he is, all that he lacks, and his desire to hold onto the only thing that gave him meaning. Without accepting that he can define himself by something else.
There is a question asked by another character at the end of the book. They ask him whether he knows if what was done to him was done with awareness, and he cannot answer. He doesn't know if the one thing he devoted his entire emotional life to was just a side-story in another person's life. And we don't know either.
I liked that complexity, and the resigned way it ends. There's no other way for it to be - our main character doesn't know how to feel anything else.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship
Minor: Suicide
The main topic of this book is the relationship between a fifteen year old boy and a thirty-something year old woman. It is handled without romanticism, and it is very clear how negatively it affects the life of the main character, but it is written in detail nonetheless, which might disturb some readers.