A review by aguywhopatsdogs
House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski
challenging
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
While I enjoyed the footnotes, multiple authors, and unconventional format at first, it got old. What felt new and exciting at the beginning, felt like a gimmick towards the middle and end. Truant was interesting at first, but the more I read, the less I liked him, and by the end I wanted no part of what he had to say. I also get that the Zampano/Textbook portions are there as critique of that culture, but it's still really, really boring to read, and there's a ton of it. My favorite part was when we're with Navidson and the House . That was engaging, and I was invested in the characters (until a footnote going into one of Johnny Truant's gratuitous sexual escapades ground the story to a halt.)
The "fun" of this book is that it's a labyrinth in itself, and requires the reader to be fully invested in figuring out what is happening. I've heard you get more out of this book the more you put in, but I was left unsatisfied (personally) with what I got out of it. I flipped to the footnotes/appendices, went back and reread sections, "deciphered" (or looked up) a code here and there, but ultimately what I got did not enhance the experience.
This book almost entirely rests on whether or not you're willing to engage on a "meta" level. If that sounds fun to you, I actually think you're going to LOVE this book. It's chock full of that. There are whole websites, forums, and subreddits dedicated to figuring out what is actually going on. A person could spend hours diving into all that, and I'm sure that's a part of why this book is as beloved as it is. I personally wasn't able to connect with it on that level. It's a bit of a bummer, but it is what it is. The first line in this book is "This is not for you," and that was true for me.
The "fun" of this book is that it's a labyrinth in itself, and requires the reader to be fully invested in figuring out what is happening. I've heard you get more out of this book the more you put in, but I was left unsatisfied (personally) with what I got out of it. I flipped to the footnotes/appendices, went back and reread sections, "deciphered" (or looked up) a code here and there, but ultimately what I got did not enhance the experience.
This book almost entirely rests on whether or not you're willing to engage on a "meta" level. If that sounds fun to you, I actually think you're going to LOVE this book. It's chock full of that. There are whole websites, forums, and subreddits dedicated to figuring out what is actually going on. A person could spend hours diving into all that, and I'm sure that's a part of why this book is as beloved as it is. I personally wasn't able to connect with it on that level. It's a bit of a bummer, but it is what it is. The first line in this book is "This is not for you," and that was true for me.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Sexual assault