A review by not_another_ana
A Thousand Ships by Natalie Haynes

challenging dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.25

When a war was ended, the men lost their lives. But the women lost everything else.

Once all fighting has stopped, what happens to the women? The survivors, the wives, the sisters, the daughters, the fighters. Natalie Hynes takes the Iliad as a starting point to explore the lives of these women and the complicated and complex feelings they experience due to their fates. We get to observe the women of Troy deal with their grief after the fall of the city and their anxiousness at their unknown future, Penelope during her long wait for Odysseus and all the bitter feelings this inspires, even the goddesses make an appearance in here. Yet, with every single point of view I encountered, I still didn't feel a thing.

I think this book stretched itself too thin trying to include as many women as possible to back up its central thesis and reason of being, in an effort to cause a greater emotional impact it actually managed to do the opposite. With such a high quantity of characters, it's difficult to create interest in them or to give all the women a particular voice. On top of that you have diverse style, prose, and tone in each chapter, and a non linear narrative which muddles everything further. My experience was closer to reading vignettes than an actual fully realized book, a reference manual in a way.

My main gripe with this book is that it didn't feel like Hynes was saying anything new. In this day and age, it seems like every day there's a new "feminist" retelling of Greek myths and stories, the market is saturated enough that you need something to make you stand out and here it lacked anything distinct. I was especially bothered by the character of Calliope, clearly an author avatar, whose sole existence was to be a mouthpiece for Hynes and to go "get it?" hint hint at the reader. Yes, I actually got it from the very summary, I don't need to be led like a blind horse. For a story about women, I thought it revolved too much about the men, and yes it would be impossible to tell these stories without their influence, but perhaps the author could have focused more on the emotionality of these characters in the face of their individual situations. There was just this general sense of resignation permeating the book that made me disengage from the very beginning. Tragedy for tragedy's sake.

Some miscellaneous complaints over here. First I found the lack of Helen baffling. I could even understand the bashing from the other characters in the book, I too would be mad at her for the part she played in the conflict whether it was logical to blame only her or not, but the author not giving her a space to speak and tell her story when she is one of the pillars of the Iliad was odd. Made me think all the Helen bashing was serious and not a narrative choice by the author. I already mentioned Calliope as the author's mouthpiece, but I would also like to add that she sounded like she knew what an iPhone was and it got on my nerves. Then there was Penelope retelling the whole plot of the Odyssey to her husband... Odysseus himself, which struck me as lazy even with all the quips and petty dialog from her. The last chapter from her point of view frustrated me because it was way more interesting than all the past ones and showed the squandered promise of this book.


Maybe the feminist retelling was the friends we made along the way.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings