A review by laedyred
Frankenstein in Baghdad by Ahmed Saadawi

dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

This book dropped the ball, which is a shame because the premise and message Saadawi attempted could have been solid. Why did there need to be an actual, literal reference to Mary Shelley? Why is there a full ass villain monologue? The writing is so on the nose that it induces a cringe. 

So much exploration into humanity could have been done through this premise. The invasion of Iraq, the terrorist and villain that lives in each of us, there were little moments where I thought I might get something valuable. Nope. The mystery of the monster is solved almost immediately. This book doesn't know what it is or what it's trying to do.

Sexism everywhere. A B-plot of one character's crush with no relation to the rest of the story that exists just to have a disgusting scene where he abuses a prostitute. Casual misogyny in the language and characterization. This is a contemporary novel, the "it was a different time" argument is bullshit. 

This book is supposed to be a satire, funny, and it just doesn't hit. I'd notice indications that a certain passage was written out of seriousness, but could never really be sure. The worst thing a book can be (besides problematic) is boring, and unfortunately this novel didn't impress me.

This could be a bad translation from the Arabic; some nuance could be missing. However, that isn't enough to explain or justify the glaring issues with the text. The blurb doesn't accurately represent the novel. I can't recommend this book, because I flat out did not enjoy it.