A review by lilyaronovitz
The Fragile Earth: Writing from the New Yorker on Climate Change by David Remnick, Henry Finder

3.0

This rating is solely based on my own enjoyment of this anthology, and in no way reflects the quality of writing or material in these essays. Of course, given that this is a collection of New Yorker essays, the writing in all of them is great, they are well-researched, and generally have a nice balance between anecdotal and more fact-heavy. However, I'm not sure if this book is necessarily meant to be read cover to cover. It's extremely long, informationally dense at times, and at least in my own opinion, not the most engaging or captivating anthology. I saw this written in another review and found that I agree: the target audience for this novel is a little bit unclear. It's not fully fact-based, so it's not the most succinctly informative for someone looking to learn more about global warming, but I'm not sure if the perspectives are unique enough to present enough particularly new or groundbreaking information for someone who already has a baseline knowledge about global warming to be really worthwhile for someone only moderately interested in the topic. Overall, the novel seemed to lack a pointed purpose, other than organizing various climate-change-oriented essays into one place. Granted, this gripe can also be interpreted the other way, as the stories were so different from each other that they all offered a take on a different aspect of climate change and the way it affects society.
There's no doubt these stories are important, and I liked the fact that they presented perspectives on climate change other than the ones we hear the most about, like just the rise in temperature, the depletion of the ozone, etc. I feel that most of my complaints could be avoided by reading this book in conjunction with maybe something more light-hearted or engaging, and so that you're not reading it from cover to cover all at once.