A review by ariadna
Bad Beginnings by Nicole Field

1.0

This book. #Tiredsigh

I'll start with the one positive:

there's plenty of good queer rep in this story. IIRC, there's a gay guy, a bisexual guy, a few transgender characters (not the MCs), and even some queer youth. On top of that, there are 5 female characters who have distinct personalities and interact with the MCs in ways that make sense for the story. I really appreciated seeing all these characters talk to each other, hang out, etc just like, you know, real life.

THAT SAID, it's not that I need action-y premises or wall-to-wall sex for me to fall in love with a book. BUT, if a story is going to happen in an everyday setting, I do need something to keep me interested.

Unfortch, this novel is INCREDIBLY DULL. Like, this story is the book version of a pair of white cotton socks. You might wear them and think "yeah, they're comfortable, but there's nothing super amazing about them." And that's exactly how I feel whenever I think about this book. My mind just goes zzzzzzzzzz.

The basic premise is Kit (a gay lawyer) is trying to get over his most recent break-up at the same time that Dante (a business owner who is also bisexual) seizes on the opportunity to get with Kit, the one guy he's crushed on for years. Complicating matters is the fact that Kit works with Con (who is Dante's older brother and Kit's BFF.)

As far as the romance goes, it's pretty serviceable. Kit and Dante get together in a mildly cute way and then story kinda stagnates. We follow along in their day-to-day lives. For example, Kit's representing a guy in a labor dispute and we get to sit with him as he discusses the minutiae of labor laws. Talk about ELECTRIFYING! #NOT

And then, around the 63%, Kit snaps at Dante after a terrible day at work. Dante tries to calm Kit down and Kit ends up breaking up with him. Just like that.

Eventually, after some minor groveling in Kit's part, they get back together, blah, blah, blah.

The sex scenes were of the "fade to black" variety. TBH, I don't think that adding super graphic/on the page sex scenes would've helped the story.

One thing I thought of as odd was a paragraph around the 43-44%. The context: Kit and Dante are about to kiss and then Dante thinks this:

His voice was low, still holding only the edge of the growl from earlier. It was the tone of voice he'd used to bring various men and women to their knees over the years of his sexual promiscuity. He was very confident when it came to his own sex appeal. And he was confident that he'd now given Kit something more to think about than whatever plan Kit had been able to come up all on his own.

Is it me or is that a backhanded ~compliment~? The correlation between Dante being bisexual + promiscuity made me side-eye the story.

Oh, and there's a random scene around the 86% in which Kit takes Dante to introduce him to his mom. Which was strange because it was played as if Kit's mom had never met Dante. The reason it doesn't make sense is because the story brings up Kit's friendship with both Con AND Dante (again, spanning years. Like, at least 20.) So, I'd think that, at some point, Dante would've met Kit's mom.

EVEN WEIRDER is that Dante asks Kit about Kit's father. Again, wouldn't Dante know what happened to Kit's dad given that he's known Kit since he (Dante) was 8 years old? #ImeanHUH???

TL;DR: This story is a slice of untoasted white bread without any butter, jam, marmalade. You might eat it if you're hungry, but it's not delicious. Do I recommend this novel? No, it's too bland. It's not terrible but the boring factor is so high that I can't think what would be appealing about it.

Also, this is the second book in a series. I read it without reading the first one and it made sense. AFAIK, the first book is about Con and how he ended up with his future wife.