A review by mx_remy
Passionate Minds by David Bodanis

3.0

Not a bad read, depending on what you're looking for. Given the very disparate natures of the two great personages this book chronicles, one might approach it from two main angles. Things look very different from Voltaire's eyes than from Émilie du Châtelet's, after all. By and large, the author does a very good job focusing on where the two converge. There are plenty of other interesting facets of 18th century France presented as well, of course.

As a Mathematics major, I was a little disappointed. I don't recall seeing any of Émilie's actual work in the book. In fact, just about the only numbers are dates. This is in stark contrast to Voltaire's work, whose excerpts are scattered all throughout. We're given to understand that Newton was a very brilliant and important person, and that Émilie, by understanding & improving upon his work so easily, was also such a person. Indubitably she was, but it would be nice to see for oneself.

As someone who very much enjoyed [b:Candide and Other Stories|19382|Candide and Other Stories (World's Classics)|Voltaire|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388239620s/19382.jpg|15207983], I was anything but disappointed with Voltaire's treatment. Rather, I felt enlightened. There were many such instances of sudden clarity, where I would have to stop and reflect back on one of his stories. The author makes it very clear just how close Voltaire's writing corresponded to the events of his life. I feel in retrospect that I should have known all this before reading his collected works in the first place; I may now have to read them again, for greater insight.