A review by narteest
Abandon by Meg Cabot

3.0

Okkkaaaaayyy....Well there are both positive and negative reviews out there that I both agreed and disagreed with. Firstly, one thing I noticed in one of the reviews was that it said that the protag, Pierce lost her necklace and then it was back on her neck. That's wrong because John does throw her necklace, but cemetery sexton finds it and returns, in a way, it back to Pierce.

But this a review, not a criticism of what others have said.

I did to some degree enjoy reading Abandon. It certainly wasn't boring, and the plot was interesting, a twist of the paranormal and mythological. The premise was excellant and enticing. Pierce was relatively a sweet though utterly confusing character, and John though aggravatingly jerky most of the time, was the beginning creation of what could be an amazing love interest.

I also liked, when finally it came up, how Cabot initiated Pierce's trip to death. I thought it was a well depicted scene especially with the horse and the lines of people and the boats. I liked that this was the introduction scene of a grown up Pierce with John the guardian of the dead, or the in-between place, or whatever, it was well written, probably the best part until Pierce, still ignorant, becomes a permanent guest of John's, and she starts freaking, all the while being attracted to him...this was part then becomes another of my hates about this novel


But...there are also so many things wrong with this novel.

I did not like the style of writing. No I lie, I didn't like it all the time. Half the time, it seemed to wrong, like it didn't belong there.

I absolutely hated! and I mean hated, Pierce's idiocy in relation to John. Honestly, if it wasn't obvious that he was absolutely fascinated by her! And in love! She returns the necklace to him, fine, and then she goes on and on about what she did wrong when he threw it. Worse, she goes and touches him, as though she is completely unaware of her affect on him.

I hated the way Pierce is a sweet...oh no, that poor animal...one second then...it's for him, why I'm doing this...the next...Aggravatingly annoying! She does it several times, especially when she's with John, and when she's with the group of A-wingers. Sure she takes into account that her cousin is not buddies with the A-wingers, but the I still don't know why....

Meg Cabot left holes all over the place in regards to things like, what exactly did it mean by 'D-wing' and how Pierce knew John was John Hayden, and how Pierce could fall immediately in love with John in the short time she was dead.

As mentioned above i like the way the grown up pierce, actually 15 year old Pierce, meets with John besides the boats. What I hated was how the next bit was played. Cabot places the two in his bedroom...and sure she's fifteen, but did she have to freak out so much? And in such an inconvenient way? She goes on and on about things that don't matter, and if she's so freaked, why is she attracted to him? And She's not very smart either...clearly missing the point she's dead. How could she miss that? I mean she fell into a pool in the cold without anyway of escaping and clearly she was close to death, and yet, it still escapes her that she is dead!

Constant repetitions of her past incidents and accidents and the words death deity and cemetery sexton annoyed me very much.

The constant jumping between past and present pissed me off too. I first began the novel very confused until I realised what was going on. And of all people and of all things to happen, her friend Hannah died. I'm just thinking where do these this just pop up? And so randomly too.

Kayla the girl we meet who partially befriends Pierce seems like an interesting character, were she developed more. I liked her premise, but would have preferred if there was more reason for why she'd been introduced and what her role was.

Oh yeah and the explanation for coffin night...bogus.

And again what is so wrong with Pierce Oliviera???? asides from the numerous flaws I've mentioned so far...stupid, slow, ignorant, blah blah blah...she's also bi polar. Yes, what else can she be? She's hot one moment, cold the next. Nice one moment, who gives a crap the next. I wouldn't have minded all this if there had been one good quality in her that makes up for all of it. But there wasn't! Sure she was sweet...but yeah...her love for animals was lets say a little compulsive and entirely or seemingly, out of character. If Pierce was a jigsaw puzzle, none of the pieces would fit! I've only read one other series by Meg Cabot, The Mediator series, and that protagonist actually rocks. Not confusing at all.

And finally, even though i'm sure there is so much more to say, the most important facet of the novel, the thing that caught my attention to begin with, and what originally sold the book to me asides the cover, was the premise of a angst, lol, romance and retelling of Hades and Persephone. That's where so much expectation finally fell into a floppy puddle of failure. I wouldn't have minded John's moodiness or Pierce's hesitation, had, there been an entire background story behind it, like a history to why he's so moody with her, and why she's so hesitant. But what I got instead was John giving her what she wanted, but not what she really wanted, in other words a kidnapping, and the entire backstory asides from the cutsy scene where they first meet (I thought that was done well) is a brief interlude between them. They hardly interact and at the end when they say they love each other...I was already so over it. This could have been such a great novel, but the pacing was so fast, which isn't so bad, except that everything in-between the fast pacing was also fast paced, meaning everything is rushed and nothing important is done justly. Characters aren't developed. Characters just are.

Feel free to read it, it's not entirely crap. For the good bits, the parts written well I've rated it 3/5 stars, but it could have been better. I was right in feeling apprehensive in picking this book to be on my 'to read' list.