A review by anjana
The Case of the Gilded Fly by Edmund Crispin

3.0

The first stumbling block I had with this book were the names for the characters. I was super confused until almost halfway through. We have a Rachel and a Helen, a Jane and Jean and a Nicholas and a Nigel. I have always skimmed the names of any book and just use the feeling each character the rest of the time to focus my attention. In this case, it was exceedingly hard to do that, and this put a damper on the speed of my reading because I had to keep going back to the introductory chapter and see everyone's entry again. Then there was the Latin. Usually, most books of an older time provide explanations as soon as obscure phrases are used, but in this case, there were none. The cast were mostly well-read men, and this added an extra hurdle. This is where my complaints end, though. I move on to the story itself.

There is a new drama being presented, and all the leading players are making their way to Oxford. We are given detailed descriptions to all their nitpicking and background information of the jealousies and all the other petty (and some not so petty) grievances. The worst character introduced to us is shown as a horrible person in no uncertain terms. It takes a while for her to meet her end, but once she does, events quickly progress. It was an intriguing plotline, and I did not guess the ending and liked the writing. The wry tone and the subtle jabs at people were quite entertaining. As were the different and intense personal dynamics which are handled quite directly. I will be reading more books by the author but will probably be mixing up a few other recommendations set in this time period in between since at least have one already in the queue.