Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Bella is a woman constantly yearning for a history and memory of her own, after being given a new life to navigate with the brain of an infant (unbeknownst to her).
A “feminist" novel from the perspective of several men is obviously something to be cautious about, however, I thoroughly enjoyed this. I do agree with the critique that artists often make it seem as though the most feminist thing a woman can do is have sex. However, a woman having sex *is* inherently political so I don’t loathe media that depicts that. Especially such a surprisingly nuanced perspective where the sex isn’t just as a means for pleasure, but distraction as well. I also think Bella’s character is too unique for that mold. She is blunt, scientific, clever, and her character represents an overall in polluted lust for freedom, not sex. So while I wont champion Gray or McCandless as feminist writers, I do think the character Bella is a great triumph. The story itself is packed with poignant social critique that is delivered alongside hilariously clever quips that made it impossible for me to not enjoy.
Sidenote: Some of the dialogue can be really drawn out, cramming words in, but that may accurately depict learned people of this period. I highly recommend reading this with the audiobook to hear the proper pronunciation of names, old English medical terms, and some of Bella’s infant speak where vowels are missing.