Scan barcode
selendrea's reviews
17 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Due's writing is so straightforward and easy to digest. As someone from the South as well, I appreciated that I could almost hear the accents through the dialogue. I felt that the world of Gracetown was vibrantly fleshed out. Due put in work richly explaining the hostile environment for the Stephens family, but also the love and support they receive, even if their loved ones were far away or no longer living. The heartfelt moments were perfect to balance out the horrors of this novel.
And boy are there horrors. The Reformatory is not for the weak-willed. While it has a supernatural flair, this narrative's true horror is in the breathing flesh. I found myself continuously so angry, not only at the events of the book, but also at the fact that so much of this unfair system is still present today, 75 years later. Unjust and racist policing and judicial systems, for-profit prisons, and well meaning people looking the other way...
That is where Due's largest strength lies: crafting an enthralling fictionalized narrative that also forces the reader to face the mistreatment of mankind that is still relevant today. Reading The Reformatory not only allowed me to experience a complex and inspiring story, but also think more deeply about current society.
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Confinement, Death, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Slavery, Torture, Violence, Police brutality, Death of parent, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, and Classism
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
While this is primarily a story about grief, the horror scenes did not disappoint. Additionally, Moreno's exploration of Mexican-American culture, Thiago's difficulty with his heritage, and the underlying political commentary on how media cycles perpetuate victimization was particularly effective and gripping to read.
The first two thirds of this novel were impeccable, and I didn't mind the plot moving in an unexpected way, but I found the ending to be abrupt and confusing. I normally enjoy endings that are left for interpretation, but I feel that Moreno perhaps struggled to wrap up several grandiose ideas in a satisfying way. I was left with the thought: "Style Over Substance." This could have been a more successful ending if it were slightly less vague, in my opinion. Nonetheless, I enjoyed blitzing through This Thing Between Us and it will likely stick with me for a long time.
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Grief, Suicide attempt, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.75
Speaking of gore, this novel is the definition of "body horror," a genre in which the body is subject to slow, horrifying changes and decimation. With a slasher villain or even a ghost, we can separate the self from the antagonist and even fight against it. With body horror, however, we have to watch ourselves become the antagonist, which is what makes this genre so hard to stomach. Cutter, additionally, does not just stick to the realm of gore. The horror of this book is also expertly established through genuine tension, playing with the psychological complexities between characters, and leaving some things for the reader to expand upon in their imagination.
The way in which the gore is described is unflinching and raw. Cutter's imagination is on full display here, and his biggest strength is being able to communicate these disgusting images in a way that makes them feel vivid and almost tangible. Because of this, this novel will not be for everyone; it is additionally heavy on animal violence, which is a valid turn-off for many readers. I personally felt that it was not gratuitous for the sake of shock, however. These scenes function to develop character and move the plot along. For example,
To me, this is nearly a perfect novel, but falls short in one aspect. While the characters felt realistic, they also simultaneously bordered on stereotypical and trope-y at times. Additionally, I noticed several instances in which one of the boys' dialogue was too advanced or flowery to justifiably be coming from a fourteen year old boy. It was hard to balance their jokes about farts on one page and then thoughtful metaphors/similes on the next page. While this was a bit distracting, I don't think it significantly hurt my enjoyment of the novel overall.
If you're a fan of hefty gore, fun and imaginative body horror, and stories of isolation and the unraveling of a psyche, you will likely love this standout addition to the horror genre.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Death, Gore, Self harm, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Body shaming, Bullying, Fatphobia, Sexual content, Vomit, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Homophobia
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
He said the thing about cats you have to understand
Is they are predator and prey
They can hunt and pounce and kill
But they're small and light and probably
Delicious
So they take some things very very seriously
I was a little girl when he said this
But when I became a woman in this world
I understood what he meant.
What. A. Book. Mary: An Awakening of Terror was not the book I expected to be, and I'm okay with that. It turned out to be so much more. At its core, this is a novel about the horrors of womanhood, with a slew of genuine terror, humor, and emotional moments thrown in-between. I found the style of writing to be nearly impeccable - the prose flows wonderfully, the metaphors are vivid, and the gore is so deliciously described. Among many horror novels I've read recently, Cassidy's descriptions of body horror felt the most powerful.
The characters here are also standouts. Mary, the titular perimenopausal character is so incredibly unique. She will simultaneously elicit pity, disgust, anger, sadness, and laughter from you. She is easy to hate, but also easy to love, which caused an uncomfortable dissonance in me, but one that I didn't mind sitting with. She is often sweaty, sticky, and unhygienic, but underneath the grime and anger, she had something worth rooting for. I wanted so badly to know how her story ended. Her aunt, Nadine, can receive an honorable mention as well for her sheer wit that makes you love to loathe her.
While I loved the plot overall, this was not a perfect novel. At times, I felt that the book was just a tad too long, and certain parts could have been culled back to allow the pacing to flow a bit better. Additionally, I think Cassidy takes on a few too many directions at once: ghosts, reincarnation, metaphysics, cults, body horror, psychological horror, etc. This mish-mash becomes convoluted near the middle of the book. I think with a more narrow, tighter plot, many readers could focus a bit better.
Regardless, Mary's biggest triumph is in its layers, and the message it doesn't spoon-feed to its reader. So often, I took a breath, put down the book, and had to think about the complexities of my interpretations.
Here are a few of those interpretations:
2. To me, Damon's voice represents internalized misogyny. Even as women, we may pick up the tendency to belittle and degrade ourselves through societal messaging. That undervoice, Damon's, represents that very real voice that works against a woman's own confidence and self-interest.
3. Damon's victims being relegated to the shadows and forced to be ignored and forgotten reminded me of the idolatry of serial killers in our society. So often, it is the violent man who is pushed into the limelight, while his (often) female victims are rarely given the same consideration. This is also echoed in Eleanor's podcast, which I would argue is a commentary on the exploitative nature of true crime in general. There may also be an underpinning of commentary on worshipping false idols and religious zealotry here, as well.
4. Mary has an opportunity to be idolized herself, but only if she allows Damon to have more power. In other words, Mary's chance to gain social power in the hierarchy and "fit in" comes from her proximity to a man. Again, this reflects real-world cultural systems in which proximity to the hegemonic majority (men) is often the simplest way for women to have control. We can also see this theme in the women of the cult, who are willing to sacrifice victims of their own gender and take part in an unethical system, partially out of the desire for safety.
I had an excellent time dissecting this book overall. If you enjoy a twisting tale with a unique female protagonist, dark humor, and a healthy amount of gore, I think this one is worth giving a shot!
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Body shaming, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Violence, Blood, and Murder
Moderate: Bullying, Sexual violence, Vomit, Police brutality, and Religious bigotry
Did not finish book. Stopped at 51%.
Although I think the interview format was unique and engaging, it has a huge flaw, in my opinion. We jump from perspectives and characters so quickly that I did not have the time to develop a genuine emotional connection to any of them. Why care when they die? Vastly more successful horror novels work because you feel a deep pit in your stomach at the thought of a character dying - their deaths mean something. Without the time and prose spent building up characters, their motivations, and their relationships, their deaths feel like little more than fodder for a fast-paced plot. Many people compare this to Lord of the Flies, but do you know why that novel was far more impactful? It takes the time to world build, to delve into the motivations and relationships of the stranded boys, and therefore you feel something when violence ensues.
If I am to believe that the take away of this novel is that
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Orlando does a brilliant job bringing the main character, Margaret, to life. She is motivated, funny, tired, and so incredibly loving. She simultaneously feels like a realistic person, but also one who is difficult to fully understand, which is purposeful. As we fall deeper and deeper into Margaret's story, her characterization and reasons behind her behavior become illuminated, and the pacing of these reveals felt perfectly spaced out.
I also want to commend Orlando on balancing horrifying elements with such refreshing use of dark humor. There were several moments in this book that made me chuckle out loud and receive a glance from my husband on the couch. I genuinely had a dream inspired by a scene in this book, that's how strongly the imagery impacted me.
The only thing that detracted from this novel for me was a lack of subtlety. I believe Orlando could have folded in the allegory between
Nonetheless, I think The September House is an incredibly fun and successful novel. If you enjoy traditional haunted house stories with a psychological twist, you won't regret giving this one a chance!
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Body horror, Child death, Death, Domestic abuse, Gore, Blood, Murder, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Mental illness, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Fire/Fire injury, and Gaslighting
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
This novels biggest strength is its depiction of the experiences and struggles of Native Americans, both off and on their reservation. Being pulled between two worlds, the pressure to uphold tradition, trauma passed down through generations, the punishment of abusing nature and taking too much from the land, grappling with addiction, and viewing their land as both a sacred place but also something to escape were all themes detailed so wonderfully through each character's story. I feel like I learned a lot by reading this book, and I frankly would have loved an entire drama about the lives of these four friends. I also absolutely loved the last page,
While it took some getting used to, I also loved Jones's stream-of-consciousness style of writing. Additionally, dialogue felt authentic and had such character to it because of the author's purposeful use of sentence structure, filler words, and vocabulary to emphasize tone and dialect. I know not all readers enjoyed this style, but by my second reading session, I felt like the text flowed easily and I could distinctly hear characters' voices in my head.
This book is not a drama - it is a horror novel. While some of the horror aspects really landed, many did not. At its core, this is a story that I should love: an ancient, female animal spirit wreaking havoc to enact revenge. I found the first half of the book to be rather gripping - Lewis's section is by far the best fleshed out and intense. Lewis's paranoia is palpable, and I could see his psyche unraveling on each page. Sadly, I think the pacing starts to stagnate in the second half when we move to the last two men. Though I enjoyed their personalities and backstories, I think this novel would have been more successful if action was better interspersed in the latter half.
In my opinion, if Jones had taken the same care to write about the action/death sequences as he did to detail 20-page long basketball sequences, this would have been a vastly more interesting book. I completely understand why basketball is so important here. It has huge cultural significance, and for Denorah,
I could possibly forgive this if the deaths had more weight. There were several deaths that felt skimmed over or waved away. Characters did not have enough time to really emotionally reflect on their friends/loved ones dying in gruesome ways.
My final issue with this novel is that many things feel unanswered and unaddressed by the end. In particular, I wish that Elk Head Woman's origin was explained better.
TLDR: despite my issues with The Only Good Indians, I think it had a lot of charm and a lot of potential. The plot is incredibly unique, and at times the storytelling is riveting and gut-punching, but it loses steam and intrigue a bit too fast. I am still glad to have read it, but I think because it so much potential, it just left me craving more.
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Gore, Miscarriage, Suicide, Abortion, and Murder
Moderate: Addiction, Alcoholism, Drug use, Colonisation, and Injury/Injury detail
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Two things really stood out for me in this book. Firstly, Adams has a particular knack for writing characters. Whether you love or hate them, the characters in this book are fully fleshed out and dripping with personality. I absolutely adore stories with gutsy heroines. The main character herself is not just a bland, wooden cutout. She has fiery motivation, a heart wrenching backstory, and somewhat frustrating flaws. I would speak on the antagonist, but I don't wish to give anything away. I will simply say that they felt unique and truly frightening. Additionally, there were several moments of dark humor between characters that is used so expertly as a brief reprieve from the tension.
Secondly, every single little detail that Adams drops into the text mattered. You don't just waste your time learning about pointless information, needless red herrings. Mindful readers who pay close attention will feel satisfied as all loops close, all loose ends tie by the end.
The only downside of my own personal reading experience is that I sadly was unsurprised by any of the twists and turns that occurred. At one time, I even felt that the plot moved in a slightly cliché direction. However, I don't feel that this hurts the enjoyment of this book, especially since some other readers may still feel shocked by multiple reveals. I truly think that fans of fast-paced thriller novels will have a fantastic time with this one.
Graphic: Child abuse, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Violence, Blood, Trafficking, Kidnapping, Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcoholism, Animal death, Confinement, Gun violence, Panic attacks/disorders, Racial slurs, and Vomit
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
We were supposed to want each other."
The Push will be a novel that sticks with me for a long time. As someone petrified at the thought of being a mother myself, the visceral way this book approaches that very fear was enthralling to me. Experiencing how Blythe painfully second-guesses her own perception alongside her was both incredibly sad yet so engaging. The themes of nature vs. nurture, generational trauma, the decay of a family, the lies we're sold about motherhood, and giving up identity to pursue the service of others were all so expertly woven into the plot. While I didn't agree with everything Blythe did, I actually appreciated that she was a flawed protagonist. I saw a bit of myself and my own mother in this novel, for better or worse.
The Push is certainly more of a slow-burn drama than an action-packed thriller/horror. I think its strengths come from its ability to fully flesh out a complicated character, as well as evoke emotion in the reader. If that sounds up your alley, I can't recommend it enough!
Graphic: Child death, Death, Mental illness, Grief, and Pregnancy
Moderate: Body shaming, Emotional abuse, Miscarriage, Self harm, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, and Gaslighting
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Let me first start with the positives! Magary attempts to take a new spin on the classic Alice in Wonderland trope, in which a regular person finds themselves transported into a fantasy world. I found myself excited to learn what odd character or situation the main character, Ben, would stumble into next. I also enjoyed the inclusion of humor throughout the story. Ben first starts as quite a bland character without much personality, but I appreciated that he develops quite a bit through his journey. Some of my favorite passages included learning more about his memories and past.
The book, however, loses me at it's plot. As aforementioned, this tale was incredibly reminiscent of previous work. I've read this story before. Man falls down a hole, experiences horrors perhaps from his own subconscious (Silent Hill much?), grows to appreciate his regular life, etc. etc. etc. I was trying so hard to find the connection between Ben's experiences and his psyche. I wanted the many situations he found himself in to have greater meaning than they did, but by the end of the book, they just felt like random, disjointed sequences. I feel that if everything had more congruency and connection, this would have been a stronger novel.
The plot did involve a twist or two that I did not expect, but I'm not entirely sure that Magary stuck the landing. I found myself shrugging at the last two chapters, wishing that the end of these trials and tribulations left me feeling more satisfied. Even as a lover of all things weird and trippy, I suppose this plot just didn't quite click for me.
Graphic: Slavery, Suicidal thoughts, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Animal death, Cannibalism, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail