Not even any descriptions of the place - The Quarter
Naguib Mahfouz writes from the vantage point of an old storyteller on the street corner
who has told a thousand tales about the place established his setting long ago
He doesn’t need to reacquaint us with this worn out world
Either we have read his older stories
Or we have read other writers from Egypt
Or watched films & shows
Or flipped through old magazines
Or been assuaged online with images of Cairo
He trusts us to conjure up an image of this lively dusty old quarter from memory & imagination
What he is more interested in are the people who inhabit this space
What moves them
What muddles them
What motivates them
Their
joys
sorrows
trials
tribulations
jealousies
rivalries
loves
losses
grief
illusions
& banalities
And perhaps a hint of nostalgia for the places, people & a way of life that is slipping away with the sands of time
Yet he manages to glean their quiet beauty from the few grains that he is still clutching on to
There are parts which are tinged with sexism & puritanism
But this is reflective of both the time when these stories were written - 3 or 4 decades ago
And the society where these tales stem from
One where beauty, meekness & piety were/are considered the biggest virtues of a woman
That’s annoying
But there’s still a motley of characters shedding light on all corners of society through these meandering lanes
The broken
The beaten
The believers
The hypocrites
The kind souls
The fake showmans
The arrogant
The greedy
The jealous & insecure
The Shakespearian jesters
The wise grey souls
The sanity of the insane
The insanity of the normalised
There is so much to unearth in these 18 tiny tales discovered in a drawer after his death
You can keep looking at them again & again
And discover a new facet each time
He had so much to sayand he said it so beautifully
Also read the foreword by Elif Shafak where she tells the interesting story of how she discovered Mahfouz’s work, the introduction by the translator Roger Allen
& Mahfouz’s own Nobel Prize speech at the end of the book
He points out many things
How the burden of equality lies on the more privileged
Every life matters
Creativity does not discriminate by race, class, gender or geographical location
Real humanity is not just caring for those who are like us & around us, but those who are different & far away
We should never lose hope
Peace is possible
Or so he believed
But above all he raised his voice against the inequalities, injustices, discrimination & despotism that he saw around him
And inspires us to do the same
Sometimes all you need is one voice to speak the truth
What to say about a book that leaves you torn to shreds
I did not cry while reading this book
But crying is not the only sign of sadness, or feeling anything deeply
Crying is an outlet for something that splinters much deeper
It's wonderful if you can
But not everyone can. Or does. Or wants to
A friend once told me I should cry more
As if crying was like turning on a tap
When you have calcified into a certain person, you don't turn into someone else overnight
That is if you change at all
Which is only if you want to, or life shapes you to
I wonder if she would suggest that to a man
Perhaps not
Men don't cry. That is the natural order of things. Even if you do try to chip away at toxic masculinity
Women not crying is unnatural, cold, psychopathic
Because god forbid a woman shows a strong façade or keeps her grief private
Perhaps then I am a man
The only logical explanation for being the way I am, because last I checked I am not a psychopath
But what has that got to do with this book you ask?
Well it's a melancholy meditation on mortality, motherhood, memory and the middling circumstances we call life
And yes it's heart-breaking
Though each heart breaks differently
So let's not compare our shattered pieces
'When we talk about mortality we are talking about our children'
I don't have children, but her pain pierced through my cold little heart
Adoption, fear of abandonment, search for identity, the crippling fear of failing as a mother and ageing alone are things that she gently draws out from her boxes of memories and lays out for us in a new light
It also brought up personal feelings related to illness & hospitalization
How to faint on your bedroom floor and wake up in a pool of blood
How to insert cameras into your body
How to get afraid of getting up from a chair
to name a few
I also felt seen by certain passages in a way I rarely have
'I was short, I was thin, I could circle my wrists with my thumb and index finger. My earliest memories involve being urged by my mother to gain weight, as if my failure to do so were willful, an act of rebellion
'I ask what caused this neuritis, this neuropathy, this neurological inflammation.
Not weighing enough, he answers.
It does not escape me that the consensus on what is wrong with me has once again insinuated the ball in my court.
…
I drink the protein shakes.
I eat the freshly laid eggs from the farm in New Jersey and the perfect vanilla ice cream from Maison du Chocolat on Madison Avenue.
Nonetheless.
I do not gain weight.'
Didion's life dug deep into mine
Just like the opening lines by Quintana
Her passing away was sadly perhaps the petfect time to read this book
It's not just about losing a child, but a quest to know whether she knew that child at all, whether any of us can ever truly know another person, even if we know them intimately, even if we raise them.
We can keep trying to run through life, but as Didion reminds us -
'By that evening when the play closed it seemed clear that I had in fact maintained momentum, but it also seemed clear that maintaining momentum came at a certain cost...One phrase that came to mind that night was "pushing yourself". Another was "beyond endurance".'
So the question is, how far will you keep pushing?
Of the 2 stories in this #TranslatedGems selection that I read for #JanuaryInJapan I liked #Kitchen more
Both were written beautifully, weaving in themes of loss, grief, pain, sadness, isolation, loneliness, the need for companionship, the drudgery of breathing day in day out when life has been snuffed out of your soul and the way food can not only rekindle old memories, but help build new ones, one meal at a time
Kitchen has the healing touch of friendship & chosen family. The two people connected by loss here still retain their individuality & space, while being there for each other.
It is a relationship rooted deeply in trust & self-respect, which is why perhaps I relate to and like it more.
It also has more diverse characters, even if some of the trans representation is a bit dated
Moonlight Shadow has the captivating touch of magic realism, but I did not like it that much because -
I find people who constantly cheat on or remain with constantly cheating partners proclaiming to be 'in love' a mockery of the word love
While I'm not sure exactly what love is, I'm sure of this - love cannot exist without respect and trust
And someone who breaks your trust is NOT in love with you, because they choose to hurt & disrespect you. Neither are you if you do the same.
You do not hurt someone you love, whether it is with cheating or dishonesty
So what I think certain characters here or people who can't fathom the above concepts are really mourning for is habit
They are used to a person being around all the time and that being snatched away leaves a hole in their heart & life
But habit is not love
SPOILERS
Questions that popped up while I was reading the 2nd story
Satsuki admits both she & Hitoshi cheated on each other many times, was Hitoshi still cheating on her when he died?
Why does Urara go to the bridge?
Is Urara the other woman?
What is Banana Yoshimoto hinting?
Does Urara go to the bridge because that's where the event is supposed to happen or because like Satsuki the bridge has some special significance for her?
Hiiragi has a similar experience in his room on the same morning. Clearly the river is not the only place where such things can happen.
Why does Urara's expression change on the bridge when she thinks Satsuki is no longer looking?
Does she realize with horror that Hitoshi not only met her but also Satsuki at the bridge?
Was Hitoshi a serial womanizer, who for all his kindness played the same tricks on every woman?
Did Urara know about Satsuki's existence and was still having an affair with Hitoshi, but she wrongly thought the bridge was their special place?
Is that why her demeanor changes after Satsuki tells her her name?
How does Urara get Satsuki's number?
She says it just came to her like magic, and considering certain other supernatural elements of the story one tends to accept it, but what if that's not the case?
What if Urara knew Satsuki's phone number because she knew exactly who Satsuki was?
Or finds out the number once Satsuki tells her her name?
How does Urara know where Satsuki lives?
Magical powers again?
Or by finding out more about Satsuki?
Or maybe by following Satsuki?
Satsuki herself follows Hiiragi at one point, so the theme of being watched & followed is already there
Is Yoshimoto giving us a clue here?
Does Urara invite Satsuki to partake in the event because she realizes like her Satsuki is mourning for Hitoshi and wants her to also have closure?
Is this her way of making amends?
Does Urara also see what Satsuki saw, or does she see something different?
Did Hitoshi really love Satsuki?
If he was with both women, did he love either at all?
Or are both women seeing a projection of what they want to see?
Are the visions an embodiment of what Hitoshi is trying to say to them, or simply what they want to hear?
Is the closure delusional?
Is it good even if it is delusional?
What is more important, to move on holding on to a false memory (and aren't all memories altered with time) or to know the truth?
Moonlight Shadow left me rattled with all these questions
But Kitchen, just like a good meal that you prepare carefully at 2 AM, left me contently contemplating the wisps of time billowing through the night sky
'But now I feel it in my gut. Why is that we have so little choice? We live like the lowliest worms. Always defeated - defeated we make dinner, we eat, we sleep. Everyone we love is dying. Still, to cease living is unacceptable.'
Never Let Me Go or Let Tommy Go And Live Your Life Girl
How do you know you are real?
What makes someone human?
What is humanity? Consciousness? Soul?
If you can raise animals to slaughter, why not humans? If not to slaughter, to use in other ways
Where is the line?
Dystopias just take reality one step further A step we are heading towards Perhaps a step we have already half taken
Like here
But what has that got to do with Tommy?
Well other than exploring the above dilemmas, it also shows how an unreliable narrator leads to a tinted truth
SPOILERS
We only see things through Kathy's eyes
Tommy is the good guy, even though he seeks constant validation Ruth is the villain, because she does not care about his ego
But is that the truth?
Ruth does many careless & hurtful things But Kathy is mean to Ruth too So is Tommy and he hurts Ruth in his own way
But we never hear from Ruth Or Tommy for that matter
Kathy is clearly in love with Tommy and feels Ruth came between them Ruth admits this eventually, tries to undo the harm But Tommy says nothing Nobody forces someone to be with another person Even if Ruth did come between them, why did Tommy choose to be with her? Twice Because she is more attractive? Or because he felt something for her? Why does Tommy only choose Kathy after Ruth is almost dying? And even then why are certain things amiss in their relationship? Are they simply beaten down by life? Or is he not attracted to her in the same way? Does he still feel something for Ruth? Is it guilt? Does he choose Kathy because there is no future with Ruth? Is Kathy his ticket to a few more years? Does he like Kathy more because she validates him? Or does he just like the validation and not Kathy at all? Does he hate Ruth because she does not validate him? Or does he hate himself because he doesn't know what he wants? Is he just a selfish piece of shit, or is it more complicated than that? Isn't he really the person who came between Kathy and Ruth? Is Ruth a better person because she ultimately chooses her friend? Or is it too little too late?
The mess that they make of their lives is what makes them human
Kazuo Ishiguro simply raises the questions
The answers are all ours
We are left wondering about these flawed characters.
The book beautifully captures how humanity is a murky construct,
how we are all just tiny driftwoods clinging to each other in the endless stream of time,
and how female friendships are incredibly fragile, especially when a man comes between them.
Sadly, the women here do not put their friendship first and dump him, that is a feminist approach I'm still waiting to see in stories like this
But perhaps women in real life rarely do that, and Ishiguro simply shows us the mirror
Even if the shell of their friendship remains, it's hollowed out by time
Perhaps that is closer to truth
Maybe there are a few Ruth's in the end
But that is the problem, it's almost always in the end
Started this for Dystopian December but completed this in Jan
Did I like it?
Of course
Confused people and complicated relationships are great, on paper
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
Beauty lies...
in the eyes of the beholder?
or a clinical ratio?
This was a sweet story about childhood love / crush, heartbreak, friendship & familial bonds that also challenges the notion of who / what is beautiful.
What is it that draws someone to another person?
Is it just surface beauty or is it something more?
Is there really something wrong with #MsIceSandwich ?
Or is it something that people made up because she was too different, too confident, didn't give a f*ck about people's opinions?
Is she beautiful?
Or is she just beautiful to him?
Through the eyes of a neurodivergent unnamed little boy, Kawakami explores these themes and also highlights the transience of life
Everything is fleeting
Everyone will be gone one day
Sometimes when you least expect it
So instead of keeping one's feelings bottled up or waiting to spend time with someone, say what you have to say & give them your time while you still can
That seems to be the moral of this tiny novella
It also unearths the many ways parents love their children, breaking the stereotypes, while giving us a glimpse into the complexity & joy of being a single parent.
But the most beautiful relationship in the book for me was the one between the little boy and his grandmother. It reminded me how little time we have with our grandparents
Or with anyone we care about
Love is about being there
Even if they can barely speak, barely hear, or even no longer recognize you, your presence is what matters.
And finally, swaddled in all the sweetness was the boy's magical dream full of double entendres. A hidden sexually laden excerpt in an otherwise innocent book
Perhaps it was intentional, a hint at a young boy's fantasies Or maybe it was written such so that younger readers can still read this book at the surface level, while others can glean more
This was my first #MiekoKawakami book, but definitely not the last Hope to read Breast And Eggs & Heaven soon
What is the price of non-conformity in a world which rewards conformity and punishes individuality?
Where being honest to yourself is considered alien
Living your truth is unacceptable
Not fitting in invites backlash
And being different needs to be ‘cured’
This story probes into this question
Unmasks the ugly truth we are brainwashed to forget -
We are just tiny cogs in a big machine
Components of ‘The Factory’
We are baby makers on a loop
Slaves raising future slaves
Using love as a drug to keep procreating
Keep feeding the Giant
Help a few feast of most others
Anyone has seen that terrible movie with Eddie Redmayne (though he is still amazing in it), Channing Tatum and that small woman (Jackie from That 70s Show) whose name I always forget? The one where planets belong to different scions of some intergalactic royal family. A lot of the movie was shit, but the premise was interesting - people on all these planets incl earth only existed to become fodder for the youth & obnoxious lifestyles of these few
Essentially Capitalism 101
#Earthlings hits the nail on the head in a
weird
horrifying
bizarre
uncomfortable
&
extreme manner
But the message remains the same -
we have no freedom
Or what we think is freedom is just an illusion
#SayakaMurata also claws out the depths of depravity that humans can sink to.
And the hypocrisy of society in sweeping away from sight (and therefore making acceptable) what is truly depraved vs what social constructs consider unacceptable
Who is brainwashing whom?
Who is delusional in this world?
Who holds the cards?
How do you evade the powers that be?
Can you break the loop?
Can you run away?
Can you refuse to participate?
And what happens to those who do?
What lies on the other side?
There are some answers here
But like all experiments the parameters define the results
So what you find may just be a tweaked or half the truth
Maybe there are no perfect answers
What we find is not what we seek
Her name is Mila Kunis, just remembered it. And the movie is Jupiter Ascending, Googled that
‘This story, like all interesting stories, is full of clever innuendo. Whoever tells a well-known story like the one about the lion-sorcerer and the fickle princess might always be hiding another story beneath it. To be seen, the story hidden beneath the well-known story has to peek out a little bit. If the hidden story hides too well beneath the well known story, it stays invisible…When it’s understood by those for whom it is intended, the story hidden beneath the well known story can change the course of their lives, can push them to transform a diffuse desire into a concrete act
Of stories
And meaning
And secrets
Hidden in plain sight
Aren’t those the best deceptions?
The best works of art
The best stories
The face beneath the face
The eyes beneath the eyes
The words beneath the words
Diop is commenting about the nature of story-telling
We all draw from
life
memory
research
our pasts
from things better left unsaid
But writers cloak them in words
So that there is a story on the surface most see
A deeper commentary that many glean between the lines
And then there’s a tale that only few know was told
A story for all
Yet a story for one
Through this blood & gore soaked saga of a soldier unravelling & sinking into the method of madness, Diop untangles the many fissures of war
How it destroy’s people’s sanity
How racism classism & xenophobia are deeply entrenched even in the trenches
& shape events
How there are no winners in a war
Everybody loses some part of themselves
How victory is just an empty shell
crunched on the battlefield
beneath the heavy boots of time
But this is also one man’s story
How he loses his mind
His humanity
Himself
But was it just war that pushed him to those depths of depravity?
Or had loss eaten away his soul long before?
Was war just the last straw?
Was his incapability to be temporarily mad like the others who threw themselves in the line of fire & clear commitment to hunt more apt?
Was his violence towards women a product of war?
Or was it rooted much deeper in how he viewed women & himself?
Was he the lion?
The hunter?
Or just a phantom of the man with the pen
‘The hidden story has to be there without being there, it has to let itself be guessed at, the way a tight saffron-yellow dress lets the beautiful figure of a young girl be guessed at. It has to be transparent.’
The blatant objectification of women in this part that I left out from the initial quote & many such passages say something not just about Alfa or Madema, but Diop
How he views women - objects that are either consumed or plundered
How men write women - the fickle princess or the mute mademoiselle
And how it severs them from becoming truly human
Much like the severed trophies that the protagonist collects
Or was that another hidden message Diop had tucked in all along?
Translated wonderfully from the French by Anna Moschovakis
‘Conscience, the most terrifying thing in the world’
Conscience creeps in
sometimes unexpectedly
It comes calling out of the blue
Forces itself like a squatter
in a corner of your heart
Refusing to budge
Asking you to speak up
Stand with the truth
Do what’s right
Do what’s needed
Not because you are
Braver
Or Better
Or Kinder
But simply because it’s the right thing to do
As Atticus Finch said about courage
‘It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway‘
Try
Fight back
Raise your voice
Refuse to be victims
Refuse to lie down quietly & be mowed over
Dignity
the most basic human right
Yet the one most trampled upon everywhere
Why do people in power think it’s ok to grind some people to the ground
tire them to their bones
work them to death?
Greed
Capitalism
Imperialism
Snatching the bread out of hungry mouths so they can build their mountain of gold
Or bitcoins
Drain the energy out of the world
Drag humanity to the precipice
And push it over the edge
Falling
Forever
So a few can fly
Around the world
Or to outer space
Kang sheds a light on this through a set of people broken by the Gwangju uprising in S Korea
Interconnected like nerves
Throbbing with the same corrupted life
Dying with the same trauma
Or sometimes becoming worse than dead
Surviving can be a curse
As a character in the book says
to die instantly is a blessing
To live & be
Isolated
Humiliated
Tortured
Have your humanity stripped away
Or to live with the ghosts of grief pain & trauma
is far more excruciating
Then memory becomes a landmine
One wrong step can blow up your heart
Your life
Then survival is an act of endurance
Dripping down like helpless rain drops
Into the puddle of life
Muddy
Murky
Morbid
Or a mirage?
Sadness
leached out of their bones & seeped into the pages
Into my fingers
Staining my mind
Yet this book has an ephemeral beauty
A weave of words so fine
That the poetry of death floats in our hands
Then hits us with the unwavering truth
Sticky like tar
Heavy like lead
But is it just that?
An ode
to the slain
the mutilated
the brutalised
the living echoes of the dead
An unsung song of hardship
Or is it more?
Was there hope?
For those who choose to remember?
For those who can’t look away?
Do the dead walk in the dark?
Chained to earth
‘Why are we walking in the dark, let’s go over there, where the flowers are blooming.’
Are there flowers blooming?
Will they ever?
‘I read in an interview with someone who had been tortured; they described the after-effects as ‘similar to those experienced by victims of radioactive poisoning.’ Radioactive matter lingers for decades in muscle and bone, causing chromosomes to mutate. Cells turn cancerous, life attacks itself. Even if the victim dies, even if their body is cremated, leaving nothing but the charred remains of bone, that substance cannot be obliterated.’
Flickering amidst the shadows of history
these blackened souls leave their imprints on time
This book reminds us to not desecrate their memory
Remember
Never Again
Discovering Han Kang’s writing last year was the most serendipitous find. She is my favourite South Korean writer.
Loved The White Book and The Vegetarian, but this book makes me respect her even more.
Not only her range in writing is expansive and amazing, she has treaded this broken terrain of history beautifully, dredging out the past from little known depths and laid bare the truth with clarity and empathy. We are horrified but also see the humanity of these people