Reviews tagging 'Cannibalism'

Forrest Gump by Winston Groom

2 reviews

rainydayswithbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous inspiring fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Insgesamt ist das Buch wirklich unterhaltsam und vielfältig. 
Man verfolgt das Leben von dem "Idioten" Forrest Gump, der jedoch gar nicht so dumm ist wie andere ihn zunächst einschätzen- zum Teil ist er sogar außerordentlich begabt und talentiert. Seine Abenteuer und Hindernisse sind interessant und Forrest ist als Charakter liebenswert (allerdings hab ich etwas gebraucht, bis ich mich auf ihn einlassen konnte). Da die Geschichte aus seiner Perspektive erzählt wird, erhält man einen noch besseren Einblick in sein Leben und seine Gedanken, die in der Regel völlig unbeschwert, gut gläubig und etwas naiv sind - wie die eines 6 jährigen Kindes eben, mit dessen IQ Forrest angeblich übereinstimmt. Dies erkennt man auch am Schreibstil, der an Forrest's Sprache angepasst ist und zu Beginn etwas irritiert, aber man gewöhnt sich allmählich daran. WICHTIG: Anzumerken ist an dieser Stelle, dass das Buch an manchen Stellen problematisch ist (rassistische/diskriminierende Formulierungen, Stereotype usw) ABER für eine differenzierte Beurteilung muss man das Erscheinungsjahr des Werks sowie die Zeit, in der die Handlung spielt, mit einbeziehen. Für die damaligen Verhältniss ist diese Ausdrucksweise nicht ungewöhnlich oder absichtlich diskriminierend gewesen, sondern alltäglich/'normal'. Aus unserer heutigen, aufgeklärten Sicht ist die Sprache zwar kritisch zu sehen, aber man muss es wie gesagt immer in Bezug zur Zeit setzten.
Wenn man bei so etwas empfindlich ist, sollte man das vorher vielleicht wissen und sich darauf einstellen. 
Obwohl ich es nicht direkt als witziges Buch beschreiben würde, hat es doch durchaus humorvolle Passagen. Nicht ohne Grund gilt das Werk als ein Klassiker der Literatur.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sillyduckie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

0.5

I’ve been meaning to read Forrest Gump for years, ever since I heard that the movie was an adaptation and the book had lots more adventures. It took me only a few pages to regret choosing to read it. It’s a mess. The fact that it was published in 1984 in the USA and 1994 in the U.K. says a lot about the publishing industry. 

I’m gonna bulletpoint my thoughts below.

Content note: sexual assault, racism, war, sexism, cursing. 

 

  1. Every single time Gump runs into a non-white person he calls them a slur. And most of the time he recalls them in memory he still calls them a slur.
  2. There is a lot of sexual assault in this book. Whilst you can debate whether Gump consents to his sex with Jenny, his first experience of sex definitely wasn’t consensual.
  3. Several women have their clothes accidentally torn off to the point of either exposing their breasts or their entire naked body.
  4. Gump regularly gets taken advantage of but claims to be smarter than everyone else and it’s honestly tough to read. He’s clearly an asshole, always talking down to and about people but then you read about him doing manual labour and only being paid a dollar, being drafted into the military and having to fight in the Vietnam War and seeing his peers die in front of him, being sent to an asylum, being called an idiot and other things.
  5. Whoever wrote the script for the movie needs a special prize because they sanitised Gump so well the movie makes him look like Little Orphan Annie instead of the foul mouthed, racist, sexist Gump in the book. 
  6. There are so many things that happen in this book that are ridiculous to the point I don’t think anybody would believe me if I told them. Like the fact Gump gets sent into space with an orangutang and a woman (the only qualified astronaut, yet somehow the dumbest on board or so they want you to believe) and after an incident with urine their rocket crash lands in Papua New Guinea where they are found by a tribe of cannibals. For these chapters the intelligence order is clearly: Gump, the orangutang, the cannibals, the woman. The woman is abducted and assaulted although the scene is played as romance, and she moves into the assailant’s hut and ultimately stays with him rather than go back to America. Oh did I mention the chief speaks English and allegedly went to an Ivy League College but says stuff like “jolly good old boy”?
  7. Gump is a millionaire by the end of the book.
  8. His mother doesn’t die but her house does burn down and she ends up in a poor house until she runs off with a Protestant. This is clearly the worst thing she could have done. Later on he leaves her for a sixteen year old and she says that Protestants have no morals. Because I guess a little sectarianism is what this book needed?
  9. Gump gets addicted to weed briefly to the point of being absolutely useless.
  10. Jenny deserves to be written better to be honest. She’s made out to be some sort of loose moral woman when she clearly isn’t. 
  11. There’s a lot I could say about the police in this book. But not right now. I’m still processing the whole thing.

Don’t read this book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings