Reviews

The Sign of the Four by Arthur Conan Doyle

libby_bebby's review against another edition

adventurous fast-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot

3.0

jammytots's review against another edition

mysterious medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? No
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

vyamilireads's review against another edition

4.0

((Indonesian Version))
Jujur kurang tertarik sama ide ceritanya, tapi bukan karena jelek, cuma ada yg lebih bagus aja wkwk Ceritanya tentang rebutan harta karun gitu sih, dan sebelum re-read, aku sama sekali lupa tentang ceritanya, yg berarti ceritanya ga seberapa berkesan buat aku

lyonnesse16's review against another edition

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? N/A
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? Yes
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

ladykillller's review against another edition

adventurous challenging mysterious slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

minna_tuum's review against another edition

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? Yes

2.0

lischa3000's review against another edition

1.0

Godt mysterie, desværre skrevet med et sprog der minder mig om en ugebladsroman. Jeg er ikke fan af Doyle's sprogbrug og fortællerstil, og jeg måtte slæbe mig igennem bogen til sidst. Det skal dog siges at jeg kun har læst en dansk oversættelse, så det kan være noget af sproget er gået tabt i oversættelsen.

phil_abernethy's review against another edition

adventurous mysterious relaxing fast-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot

3.5

charliequicken's review against another edition

eeeeee uncomfortable. a bunch of white men steal some treasure from india and then start fighting about who gets to have it. yikes. it was difficult to separate that from the story itself, so i didn't like it as much as other sherlock holmes stories. also we should all count ourselves lucky doyle wasn't a romance writer, because even though he makes mistakes in his research, the 'romance' was rough 

darkmagician12's review against another edition

adventurous funny mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? Yes
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25