Reviews

Dark Jenny by Alex Bledsoe

jaymeks's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

While I am partial to the Arthurian legends, I thought this book was much better written than the previous two. Once I got about 50 pages in, I was hooked and couldn't put it down. While I kind of knew the ending already, I thought some of the subtle changes really helped the story, and twisted the ending just enough to make it a good one.

litwrite's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

My favourite in the series so far - I loved Bledsoe's take on the King Arthur myths. I'm impressed with how strong these books have been, consistent page turners and fantastic airport reading material.

felinity's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

If Jim Butcher ever decided to write a most enjoyable Dresden-style mystery around King Arthur, it'd be like this. [b:Dark Jenny|8684873|Dark Jenny (Eddie LaCrosse, #3)|Alex Bledsoe|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1312051949s/8684873.jpg|13557123] is familiar and yet different, so you get a little "aha" moment every now and again when another piece falls into place, giving you the opportunity to enjoy a familiar story and setting, but with nothing quite the same as you remember. This also stands alone in the Eddi LaCrosse series; you don't need to have read the others to understand or enjoy it.

Small tip: if you're picky about historical accuracy and can't bear to watch a movie or read a book where "That wasn't even *invented* yet!", you might want to think again. It's nothing major, but the few things I noticed might drive you insane.

If, however, you love something that's tongue-in-cheek, doesn't care about tiny specifics but does care about smart comments and a disinterested hero who nonetheless gets pulled into the middle of a crisis, start reading!

alishaaye's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

dreamerfreak's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

[a:Alex Bledsoe|644349|Alex Bledsoe|http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1312811497p2/644349.jpg] writes an amazing new twist to the classic tragedy of Arthur and Guinevere in the latest Eddie LaCrosse novel. When a mysterious coffin is delivered to the tavern housing Eddie's office, Eddie tells the true tale of what happened on the island of Grand Bruan seven years ago when the happy peace established by King Marcus collapsed. The legends told since then haven't quite gotten it right, and Eddie just might be the only one still alive who knows the truth... even if it's not so glamorous.

I loved the first two Eddie LaCrosse novels, and Dark Jenny didn't disappoint me in the least. A little younger, but no less stubborn (and cynical), Eddie always amuses. Through accusations of murder, treasonous plots, broken fingers, and magic of all sorts, he still manages to unravel the snarled secrets that have been brewing for two decades and more. Don't count on knowing the ending of this book, just because you know the legend that inspired it. Dark Jenny is a fascinating mystery that will keep you wondering even after you've finished.

The only thing that kept this from being a full five star review was that I wished that there was more of the "present" time involved in the story. But that's why I'm waiting so impatiently for the next book.

[I received this book for free through First Reads and was not required to write a positive or any other type of review. All opinions stated herein are solely my own.]

majkia's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

How can you not love a sword jockey who says things like, "And like a moron, I ..."

ptaradactyl's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I have never liked Arthurian legend. Ever.

The impending tragedy (and the frequent stupid decisions that led to it) frustate me--as does the fact that the dream is never realized, something I didn't realize until I read this book. I really appreciated Alex Bledsoe's take on the whole hypothetical mess.

I like Eddie LaCross, and his adventure through the legend is one of the best versions I've encountered. The book worked very well as a stand-alone novel, and I'm ready to go back and read the first two in the series because of it.

srlemons42's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

As far as loose retellings of the King Arthur mythology goes this one was pretty good. It was a mildly well worn tale and not-so-unique and yet it kept me entertained for the whole story. I call that a win!

shirezu's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The third book in the Eddie LaCrosse series is a prequel of sorts with Eddie telling the story of events set before the first two books. This book brought the series back to the detective style of the first book and was better for it. Eddie once again on a proper, paid job to discover the truth through his unique methods.

It brought the mystery and intrigue back the previous book was missing. Here Eddie working his way around the land in his youth is in an unfortunate place at an unfortunate time and his only way out is to solve the murder and the conspiracy surrounding it.

Sharp, witty, mysterious and surprising this book hit all the right points. Not quite a 5-star book but a very strong 4. I've really enjoyed this series and will have to try Alex Bledsoe's other books while waiting for the next Eddie LaCrosse adventure.

waden34's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I really enjoyed this book. It was a good blend of an Arthurian style legend and a mystery novel. I haven't read any of the other books in the series, but I certainly will now.
The main character is very well done and I liked how cynical he is. I also like how the book is in the first person, which is a rarity in a fantasy novel.
The only negative thing I can say about the book is that it felt like two different books. The beginning and the end read like a good mystery, but the middle is just a basic adventure story. It was still enjoyable, just somewhat disjointed for me.