Reviews

Suldrun's Garden by Jack Vance

shoba's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

An epic tale of kings and knights, wizards and fairies and ambitions and betrayals.

The Princess Suldrun of Lyonesse, is under house arrest and forced to consider an undesirable marriage.
“‘Suldrun refused to look toward her father. "I am made out to be something I do not choose to be."
"You do not enjoy the admiration of men?"
"I have done nothing admirable."
"Nor has a rose, nor a sapphire of many facets."
"They are ornaments; they have no life of their own.’”

Prince Aillas, Suldrun’s betrothed, and father of their son, Dhrun, fights to regain the throne of Troicinet and to find his son. Aillas, with the help of the magician Shimrod, seeks Duke Carfilhiot, the man who is holding his son hostage.
"….My own quest can wait an hour or two." The Never-fail still dangled from his wrist. He glanced at the index, then again, incredulously. "Look you at the tooth!"
"Now it points south!"
Aillas turned slowly to Shimrod. "Carfilhiot drove south with two children: what are their names?"
"Glyneth and Dhrun."

Duke Carfilhiot is defeated and the now King Aillas is reunited with his son.  However war with King Casmir of Lyonesse, father of the now deceased Princess Suldrun, seems  imminent.
“‘Did you find his face familiar?" An arch and meaningful smile trembled along Brother Umphred's lips.
Casmir glared at him. "As a matter of fact, I did. What of it?"
"Do you recall the young man who insisted that I marry him to the Princess Suldrun?"
Casmir's mouth sagged. He stared thunderstruck, first at Brother Umphred, then out across the sea. "I dropped him into the hole. He is dead."
"He escaped. He remembers."
Casmir snorted. "It is impossible.’”

tpalmi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.0

mrfrenchtoasts's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4.5/5. Took me a while to read this. I took a few breaks in between readings. Not sure why though, because this book is proper greatness. It's my first Vance book, and I think I'm hooked. Fleshed out character, great prose, great story, what more can you ask for? Also, I think I've never used a dictionary as much as I did while reading this. Not sure how he found all those perfect words, but it never felt forced. The low part of the book is in the middle, it's just walking and walking, and bad luck. It was fine, but after about 250 pages you want a change in scenery.

I'll definitely read the next one.

pureliquidevil's review

Go to review page

5.0

Jack Vance doesn't disappoint. He's truly one of the best and most underrated sci-fi fantasy writers.

aurelia2's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

1.5

ashleylm's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Let's be clear: it's not perfect, and it's not for everybody. But (for me) it's imperfections seem deliberate and charming. It was apparently written in the 1980s, but has the air of something written in the 1940s crossed with something written in the 1600s.

If you're familiar with the "romance" genre--not the Harlequin or Mills & Boone kind of romance, but the antecedent of the novel, exemplified in Sir Philip Sidney's Arcadia, you will have a sense of what to expect: a dazzling array of characters, whose character is little delved into, points-of-view that skip all over the place, an uneven sense of scale and description (there is no guarantee that the more that is written, the more important it is. At one point he lists, in list form, the characteristics of a dozen or-so individual fairies, none of whom enter into the story), and other such flaws.

And yet, it felt like a masterwork to me, and criticizing it would be like criticizing The Odyssey or Grimms' Fairy Tales. I loved it. It was odd, but lovely, and very much itself throughout.

(Note: 5 stars = amazing, wonderful, 4 = very good book, 3 = decent read, 2 = disappointing, 1 = awful, just awful. I'm fairly good at picking for myself so end up with a lot of 4s). I feel a lot of readers automatically render any book they enjoy 5, but I grade on a curve!

ommsetu's review

Go to review page

3.0



3.5 stars. This is written in a classic high fantasy style, so the characters are a bit less nuanced than we've come to expect from modern fantasy, but Vance has developed a really interesting fantasy world in Lyonesse, and I look forward to reading the rest of the trilogy.

magolden13's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious

3.0

kimburglar's review

Go to review page

4.0

Vance uses a lot of fantasy tropes with self-awareness and a matter-of-fact narration style that regards ridiculous scenarios so casually that it only further emphasizes how silly traditional fantasy tends to be. In one of my favorite side anecdotes, a duke and his friends attend a solstice festival pageant: "...they agreed that the maidens who represented the Seven Graces were remarkably charming, but could form no consensus as to which was supreme. They discussed the matter well into the evening over wine, and at last, to resolve the matter in a practical way, kidnapped all seven of the maidens and took them across the water to Malvang." I'd read a few Vance short stories before this book, and all read in a similarly snarky voice. There are warring kingdoms, magicians, fairies, and a smattering of monsters, and most of them have enormous egos: as a result, the political and magical disputes that would normally read as epic fantasy feels more like a sitcom of petty grievances.

Characters tend to fall cleanly on the good and bad side, and the good protagonists are blandly angelic with moments of violent justice. There isn't a single protagonist, as Suldrun's Garden consists of five separate narrative threads that come together nicely in the end. Though the heroes suffer from blandness, their journeys take the reader through a large scope of the world; they're also abused almost everywhere they go, setting up several revenge quests that end up being the more engaging parts of the story.

I really could have done without the fantasy trope requiring all ladies enduring sexual harassment/abuse. Every female character is threatened with rape, especially a girl who is frequently described as not yet a woman. There's a somewhat worrisome amount of adults and trolls lusting after and forcing themselves upon prepubescent girls.

rachelish's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Originally read sometime between 2001 and 2004