Scan barcode
alexjamiestaples's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Mental illness, Slavery, Violence, Kidnapping, and Murder
Minor: Gore
very_mellifluous's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
So...this book was not what I expected it to be. It was more somber (only by my interpretation) as a whole, and because the main character is sort of, in reality, the house (or the north woods), there is a lot of death that we are brought along to watch and deal with, which is hard for me!
There is a lot of beautiful writing of Nature, and I want Daniel Mason and Anne Carson to collaborate on something. He has a lovely sense of writing rhythm into his prose and my favorite passages involved descriptions of the woods and flora/fauna within.
Truthfully I would have loved for the book to end on a high note, with the final inhabitant we watch be someone who cares for the house and 'resets' it, almost like Osgood, with her care and enthusiasm for the place. That does not happen, but what we do see is beautiful and idyllic. It occurred to me that Osgood and his daughters called the place Eden, and it seems that they truly imbued that into the land. Truly the character I care about most is the painter, William Teale, who deserved love!!!! There is a character involved in his story that I spent the rest of the book cursing at.
There is also a line from Osgood's narration at the start where he writes about the spirit of the eldest apple tree being a guardian for the rest of the orchard, and he writes: "I have come to the opinion, generally, that he who does good to the land shall be protected, while he who trespasses upon her will be met with violent return." It turns out that Osgood grows to be this sort of figure himself, which is very sweet and comforting.
Lastly, I found it interesting that the "original" pair we see inhabiting this space, the pre-Puritan escapees, were not more present in the narrative. Most of the other characters are threaded through newer storylines, but these are allowed to rest. I wonder why Mason chose to do this - instead, he uses Osgood as an anchor point (okay, we see a lot of the people in between Osgood and the first pair, but Osgood feels different). The first pair really feel like a localized Adam and Eve, who are too pure and mythical to dredge from the past. They spiritually inhabit the place, but don't make any appearances. I just wanted to note that for myself.
Also, the section when Nora comes into the glade with Osgood could totally be scored with Televangelism by Ethel Cain.
There is a lot of beautiful writing of Nature, and I want Daniel Mason and Anne Carson to collaborate on something. He has a lovely sense of writing rhythm into his prose and my favorite passages involved descriptions of the woods and flora/fauna within.
Truthfully I would have loved for the book to end on a high note, with the final inhabitant we watch be someone who cares for the house and 'resets' it, almost like Osgood, with her care and enthusiasm for the place. That does not happen, but what we do see is beautiful and idyllic. It occurred to me that Osgood and his daughters called the place Eden, and it seems that they truly imbued that into the land. Truly the character I care about most is the painter, William Teale, who deserved love!!!! There is a character involved in his story that I spent the rest of the book cursing at.
There is also a line from Osgood's narration at the start where he writes about the spirit of the eldest apple tree being a guardian for the rest of the orchard, and he writes: "I have come to the opinion, generally, that he who does good to the land shall be protected, while he who trespasses upon her will be met with violent return." It turns out that
Lastly, I found it interesting that the "original" pair we see inhabiting this space, the pre-Puritan escapees, were not more present in the narrative. Most of the other characters are threaded through newer storylines, but these are allowed to rest. I wonder why Mason chose to do this - instead, he uses Osgood as an anchor point (okay, we see a lot of the people in between Osgood and the first pair, but Osgood feels different). The first pair really feel like a localized Adam and Eve, who are too pure and mythical to dredge from the past. They spiritually inhabit the place, but don't make any appearances. I just wanted to note that for myself.
Also, the section when
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Mental illness and Violence
emjay2021's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
emotional
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Fantastic. I started with the print book, but was having a hard time getting through it and had to return it to the library. Then I picked it up again as an audiobook and loved it. Don’t know if it was because of the different format, but the different narrators are all excellent and really add to the experience of the story. I felt like I was sitting around a fire with people taking turns telling stories about the land we were sitting on.
I loved all the callbacks to previous chapters and the recurring characters, human and non-human alike. THE BEETLES! Some stories were funny, some suspenseful, some poignant. There is something special about this book. Highly recommended if you like historical fiction and linked stories with a strong sense of place and detailed description. I’m so glad I gave it another chance.
I loved all the callbacks to previous chapters and the recurring characters, human and non-human alike. THE BEETLES! Some stories were funny, some suspenseful, some poignant. There is something special about this book. Highly recommended if you like historical fiction and linked stories with a strong sense of place and detailed description. I’m so glad I gave it another chance.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Mental illness, Violence, and Murder
mmccombs's review against another edition
reflective
medium-paced
5.0
I absolutely adored this book! So creative and fresh, the prose was lovely and the mix of mediums (chapters, letters, songs, images) was so engaging. Following one house through time made for an incredibly interesting character study, the setting being the main character and the people flowing in and out of it character development. The way nature was described filled me with wonder and made me want to go on a hike (and I do not hike!), but also made me interrogate how humans have perceived “nature” over time. I loved thinking about how each inhabitant of the yellow house came to it with different intentions, with different relationships to the solitude and wildness it offered. And seeing how characters we meet show up later for other characters, how their actions are remembered when so much of their context is lost to time. It was also unexpectedly pretty funny, like there was some silly content and really funny bits that caught me by surprise. Basically this was a book that I enjoyed just thinking about, one that I will probably continue to engage with and reread!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Violence, Murder, and Colonisation
lilly_dav_reading's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
The author said it himself-just out of context, “The book was massive and terrible and untethered, and as a reader who prided herself on not slinking before difficult texts, she found herself in awe at its sheer strangeness.”
{+} loved the concept, loved how the stories weeded together in the most delicious of ways, loved that the stories are filled with ghosts of their predecessors.
{-} took me forever to finish because it felt very long winded at times.
But happy I stuck it out because it’s a beautiful tale of time, nature, and the humans who navigate time and nature.
{+} loved the concept, loved how the stories weeded together in the most delicious of ways, loved that the stories are filled with ghosts of their predecessors.
{-} took me forever to finish because it felt very long winded at times.
But happy I stuck it out because it’s a beautiful tale of time, nature, and the humans who navigate time and nature.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder
Moderate: Mental illness and Violence
Minor: Racism
cryptofauna's review against another edition
emotional
informative
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.5
what was even the point of this book.
badly paced, no cohesive plot line or honestly any plot to begin with. had a few interesting moments in a couple of the short stories but it jumps around far too much to actually get properly aquatinted with some of the characters. (like i loved mary and alice because they were the most robust and had more time than anyone else to flesh out and have a compelling story i feel like)
i really don’t mind a book in this sort of format (one of my fav books of all time greenwoods is like this) but i feel like this did not do the multigenerational independent yet slightly connected stories well at all.
honestly should have dnfed it but i was really hoping it would get better or have some kind of ending that tied it all up. it felt like there was supposed to be come deep meaning that i clearly missed
had high hopes for this one and i don’t understand why everyone else in these reviews is obsessed with it
badly paced, no cohesive plot line or honestly any plot to begin with. had a few interesting moments in a couple of the short stories but it jumps around far too much to actually get properly aquatinted with some of the characters. (like i loved mary and alice because they were the most robust and had more time than anyone else to flesh out and have a compelling story i feel like)
i really don’t mind a book in this sort of format (one of my fav books of all time greenwoods is like this) but i feel like this did not do the multigenerational independent yet slightly connected stories well at all.
honestly should have dnfed it but i was really hoping it would get better or have some kind of ending that tied it all up. it felt like there was supposed to be come deep meaning that i clearly missed
had high hopes for this one and i don’t understand why everyone else in these reviews is obsessed with it
Content Warnings
Moderate: Death and Terminal illness
Minor: Sexual content, Suicide, and Violence
fkshg8465's review against another edition
emotional
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
This is one of the most interesting storytelling formats I’ve ever read. Is done effectively. It’s almost like a bunch of short stories connected through time with the setting and the part characters weaved throughout to provide continuity. It was enjoyable to read and to contemplate.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Cancer, Confinement, Death, Hate crime, Infidelity, Mental illness, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Car accident, Suicide attempt, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
mammut's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Death, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Racism, Slavery, Violence, Religious bigotry, Car accident, Murder, and Fire/Fire injury
town_scar's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
informative
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Have we not all looked at houses all around the world and pondered what history the walls may tell? What the earth might know?
This novel is a true masterpiece. A combination of prose and poetry that embodies naturalism and spiritualism at its core.
Perhaps my only gripe is that I wish there had been a greater focus on non-White individuals. The main owners of the house are all white (with a single brief exception) and while the original inhabitants of the land are acknowledged they are not given a voice.
This novel is a true masterpiece. A combination of prose and poetry that embodies naturalism and spiritualism at its core.
Perhaps my only gripe is that I wish there had been a greater focus on non-White individuals. The main owners of the house are all white (with a single brief exception) and while the original inhabitants of the land are acknowledged they are not given a voice.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Homophobia, Mental illness, Slavery, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Medical trauma, Car accident, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Outing, and Colonisation
Moderate: Racism, Sexism, Sexual content, and Xenophobia
Minor: Cancer
rednikki's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
The more I think on this book, the more I dislike it. Much like Edward Rutherford's famous books, Mason tells the history of a place through the people who have lived there over time.
But Mason only tells the story through the white people who have lived (or in one case, visited) there. Excluding people of color from point of view was clearly a decision Mason made. The first time we encounter the place, it is through the eyes of some of the first white settlers of the US; we never see it through the eyes of the historical people of the land. There is one section where there is a person of color living in the place, and Mason chooses to tell the story through the point of view of a white visitor instead.
Rutherford's books also usually have at least some time points where there is hope and happiness. In Mason's world, there is only misery, tragedy and despair. Sometimes it's just an undercurrent, sometimes it is overwhelming – but whenever his characters experience joy they are punished for it.
Do not recommend.
But Mason only tells the story through the white people who have lived (or in one case, visited) there. Excluding people of color from point of view was clearly a decision Mason made. The first time we encounter the place, it is through the eyes of some of the first white settlers of the US; we never see it through the eyes of the historical people of the land. There is one section where there is a person of color living in the place, and Mason chooses to tell the story through the point of view of a white visitor instead.
Rutherford's books also usually have at least some time points where there is hope and happiness. In Mason's world, there is only misery, tragedy and despair. Sometimes it's just an undercurrent, sometimes it is overwhelming – but whenever his characters experience joy they are punished for it.
Do not recommend.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Homophobia, Slavery, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Forced institutionalization, Dementia, Kidnapping, Grief, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Injury/Injury detail