Scan barcode
animarret2boog's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore and Violence
Minor: Addiction, Homophobia, and Sexual content
biobeetle's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Violence, and Death of parent
Moderate: Blood and Murder
Minor: Sexual content
sspaghettiboness's review against another edition
dark
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Stranger Things fans, consider reading the spoiler.
This book is undeniable pure poetry. The word choice and sentence structure gave me flashbacks to reading Fight Club for the first time, in awe of his sentence structure. The hard stops, the drop dead gorgeous sentences that come out of nowhere. You could flip this book open to any page and find a sentence to highlight. Not to come across as arrogant, but this writing style overall reminded me a lot of what I do in my own work, so it deeply resonated with me. The shifts in viewpoints was very dark and satisfying, I liked those chapters the most.
The gore and horror was well executed (this from an avid extreme horror reader). Sometimes “creature feature” authors spend too much time trying to convey how the being looks that it’s appearance becomes confusing and loses its impact. Sort of like when an author over describes the clothing their MC is wearing.
Mid-tier - some people are going to love the coming of age, figuring out your sexuality, and internalised homophobia of it all. Some people aren’t. I was indifferent to it, even though it really is the defining plot. I am the kind of person who reads for the style, structure, word choice, devices, and dialogue. Obviously, a weak plot or one riddled with holes is something I’ll pick up on; the same can be said about a very strong and unique plot presenting a story or viewpoint I’ve never experienced before. So he gets all the points for style, but not many for substance.
But I have to give this book 3.5 stars because the opening narrative was not strong. Dries comes out hot with that first chapter, but what follows is incredibly dull. Maybe he was trying to pull the rug out from under the reader? But the pacing and build wouldn’t be indicative of that. Some of the character building made sense, some of it was just filler and did not reflect or connect to who each character is revealed to be. There’s a specific scene in the beginning with the protagonist, his sister, and his best friend that could’ve had so much more to offer the novella if he just changed one thing.
Slight issue - I caught 3 grammatical errors in the book that shouldn’t have slipped anyone by.
I don’t know if this was intentional, because I do not know when this book was written, only when it was published. There was a lot of Stranger Things happening, and I’ve never ever seen beyond the first two seasons. Yes, this felt like an elevated and intelligent version. But so many comparable things. By the end, it was impossible to deny, just way too many similarities. Dad in the basement like Barb in the pool. The creature being tied to the protagonist. The homosexuality reveal. The tunnelling and overall appearance of the neighbours house. The way the creature looked. The aunt like Hopper.
I don’t mind reimaginings, but I’m actually shocked they didn’t mention it on the back cover. I wish I’d known before going into reading, it would not have stopped me, but it annoyed me to discover on my own.
Overall, the prose is the strongest feature of this book. The narrative itself left more to be desired and would’ve been more interest with some reworking or speeding it up. I will certainly be reading more of his work.
This book is undeniable pure poetry. The word choice and sentence structure gave me flashbacks to reading Fight Club for the first time, in awe of his sentence structure. The hard stops, the drop dead gorgeous sentences that come out of nowhere. You could flip this book open to any page and find a sentence to highlight. Not to come across as arrogant, but this writing style overall reminded me a lot of what I do in my own work, so it deeply resonated with me. The shifts in viewpoints was very dark and satisfying, I liked those chapters the most.
The gore and horror was well executed (this from an avid extreme horror reader). Sometimes “creature feature” authors spend too much time trying to convey how the being looks that it’s appearance becomes confusing and loses its impact. Sort of like when an author over describes the clothing their MC is wearing.
Mid-tier - some people are going to love the coming of age, figuring out your sexuality, and internalised homophobia of it all. Some people aren’t. I was indifferent to it, even though it really is the defining plot. I am the kind of person who reads for the style, structure, word choice, devices, and dialogue. Obviously, a weak plot or one riddled with holes is something I’ll pick up on; the same can be said about a very strong and unique plot presenting a story or viewpoint I’ve never experienced before. So he gets all the points for style, but not many for substance.
But I have to give this book 3.5 stars because the opening narrative was not strong. Dries comes out hot with that first chapter, but what follows is incredibly dull. Maybe he was trying to pull the rug out from under the reader? But the pacing and build wouldn’t be indicative of that. Some of the character building made sense, some of it was just filler and did not reflect or connect to who each character is revealed to be. There’s a specific scene in the beginning with the protagonist, his sister, and his best friend that could’ve had so much more to offer the novella if he just changed one thing.
Slight issue - I caught 3 grammatical errors in the book that shouldn’t have slipped anyone by.
I don’t mind reimaginings, but I’m actually shocked they didn’t mention it on the back cover. I wish I’d known before going into reading, it would not have stopped me, but it annoyed me to discover on my own.
Overall, the prose is the strongest feature of this book. The narrative itself left more to be desired and would’ve been more interest with some reworking or speeding it up. I will certainly be reading more of his work.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death and Bullying
Minor: Drug use, Homophobia, Sexual content, and Outing
loyddl's review
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
medium-paced
4.75
I really did not know what to expect from this book and I’m presently surprised and kind of disappointed.
First the positives. The imagery works wonders in creating an over all creepy vibe. It’s not scary as much as it is unsettling and combined with the 90s setting and anxieties the book does well in making you feel like something is wrong without having a clear answer why.
As for the negatives, and this might be nit-picky, but the book’s story description and what the story actually was might make you thing your going to get something different. I thought the events of the story would be taking place after the life changing incident of the book but it actually takes place beforehand. We don’t actually spend a lot of time in the after, so don’t expect a kid on the run kind of story. It is still a good story but kind of feels like false advertising. The ending also felt weird but maybe I’m just missing the metaphor.
Regardless, defiantly give this one a read if your interested in creepy aesthetics and great writing.
First the positives. The imagery works wonders in creating an over all creepy vibe. It’s not scary as much as it is unsettling and combined with the 90s setting and anxieties the book does well in making you feel like something is wrong without having a clear answer why.
As for the negatives, and this might be nit-picky, but the book’s story description and what the story actually was might make you thing your going to get something different. I thought the events of the story would be taking place after the life changing incident of the book but it actually takes place beforehand. We don’t actually spend a lot of time in the after, so don’t expect a kid on the run kind of story. It is still a good story but kind of feels like false advertising. The ending also felt weird but maybe I’m just missing the metaphor.
Regardless, defiantly give this one a read if your interested in creepy aesthetics and great writing.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Body horror, Child death, Death, Homophobia, Death of parent, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Animal death, Bullying, Sexual content, and Violence
seawarrior's review against another edition
4.0
This was a unique, tense horror story that is heavy on nostalgia. While I am too young to have pleasant memories of some of the experiences and settings in this book, they added a richness to Heath's youth before it was destroyed. However, I was somewhat disappointed by how much of the story was taken up by descriptions of Heath's daily life. This is a short book, and there wasn't much horror during some segments of it. The beginning and ending also felt rushed, and I wish they had been polished more. Yet the creativity of Heath's monster, and how it relates to internalized homophobia, definitely made the story worth reading.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Violence, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Homophobia, Misogyny, Sexual content, and Murder
sylvestra's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Bullying, Death, Gore, Homophobia, Infidelity, Blood, and Death of parent
Moderate: Animal death
Minor: Alcoholism, Child death, Cursing, Drug abuse, Drug use, Sexual content, Suicidal thoughts, Forced institutionalization, Grief, and Car accident