Scan barcode
sleeping_raccoon's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
medium-paced
3.5
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Ableism, Body shaming, and Fatphobia
Minor: Addiction
Some of the language this book used made me a little uncomfortable with myself as a person who has struggled with an eating disorder in the past. He provides examples of the ways techniques might be implemented, and often those examples are things like tracking calories or weighing yourself every morning. He puts a disclaimer at the end of the book saying that tracking every little thing is not conducive to health, but literally starts the book by saying that weighing yourself every morning is an example of a good habit (with the caveat of that depending on who you are- but there is no acknowledgement of why this kind of thinking might be legitimately dangerous for many people). He consistently uses weight loss as a metric for progress, despite his whole book being about steps towards a goal. Why not look at how much stronger they became instead? Another example: I don’t necessarily think there’s anything wrong with rewarding yourself with ice cream after a hard workout, unless that ice cream will make you feel that your workout was pointless (which ir wouldn’t be), and in that case, the problem isn’t the ice cream, but society and influences like Clear that suggest that it is The information was straight forward and helpful for me, but like he says at some points, please don’t apply this in ways that will hurt you.ceallaighsbooks's review against another edition
hopeful
informative
inspiring
lighthearted
reflective
fast-paced
3.0
“In the beginning, small improvements can often seem meaningless, however, as you continue to layer small changes on top of one another, the scales of life start to move. The secret to getting results that last is to never stop making improvements. It’s remarkable what you can build if you just don’t stop. It’s remarkable the knowledge you can build if you don’t stop learning.”
AUTHOR—James Clear
PUBLISHED—2018
PUBLISHER—Penguin Random House
GENRE—self-help / (DSM/MCI/white/cishetero/patriarcal) psychology, kinda
SETTING—your minddd ~whooOo0ooOo00ooo~
MAIN THEMES/SUBJECTS—forming new(/“good”/efficient) habits & “breaking”(/unlearning) old(/“bad”/inefficient) habits, brain science & psychology, cue→craving→response→reward, feedback loops, sensory perception, automatic response reactions, consciousness & awareness, intentionality, environment design, our relationships with objects, addiction & the myth of “self control”, our selves & our habits as products of our environment, impact of “peer pressure”—sociocultural norms & expectations—on habits, normalization of imperialist & capitalist systems, identity-first & systems-oriented processes of behavior change, useful language, concepts, & vocabulary around intentional change
“There are no good habits or bad habits. There are only effective habits. That is, effective at solving problems.”
My thoughts:
PREMISE—Straightforward, maybe a bit overconfident: a synthesis of “the best ideas smart people” (by whom he apparently means warren buffet, lászló polgár, & jared diamond…) “figured out a long time ago” as well as “the most compelling discoveries scientists have made recently” regarding “the science of how to create and change your habits in a way that is easy to understand and apply.” Clear’s explicit intention is “to find the ideas that matter most and connect them in a way that is highly actionable.”
He also says: “anything wise in these pages you should credit to the many experts who preceded me. Anything foolish, assume it is my error,” but as I was reading I strongly suspected the opposite to be true, particularly the one-offs where he critiqued that formative scholarship (but that’s a different discussion I don’t have time for rn 😅).
EXECUTION—Despite the popularized, over-simplified (to the point of nearly being inaccurate) interpretations of scientific research & experiments (which were already problematic to begin with—I mean 1) the casual way Clear discussed some pretty horrible animal lab-testing & even that one psychiatrist who experimented on his children*?? 🤢) as the main basis of “the evidence” for his information & process, 2) the constant, highly problematic use of the universal “we” & “you,” 3) the wholehearted normalization of capitalist & colonial violence, & 4) all the issues re: fatphobia, ableism, & cishetero- & ciscognitive normativity, there was still some interesting & useful information in this book. Which kind of goes to show you just how insidious a lack of critical thinking can be even among otherwise curious, intelligent people…
*[“The childhood of the Polgár sisters was atypical, to say the least. And yet, if you ask them about it, they claim their lifestyle was attractive, even enjoyable.” . . . “…encouraging her to go back to sleep, he said, ‘Sofia, leave the pieces alone!’ To which she replied, ‘Daddy, they won’t leave me alone!’” — like. this is literally a disorder!]
So: is this book an incredibly white- & ablebodied-centric, ciscognitive-/cishetero-normative, fatphobic, soulless, & “science-first”—to the point that some explanations & reasonings feel a bit forced or absurdly oversimplified—piece of work with a ton of statements uncritically presented as universal regarding things like democracy, “healthy” marriages, “obesity,” & other particularly american ethnocentrisms? …Yes. BUT! There were actually a couple of good nuggets in here that I felt were worth my reading this for a work-related bookclub. 😆 (Glad I borrowed it from the library though.)
“the Plateau of Latent Potential . . . Complaining about not achieving success despite working hard is like complaining about an ice cube not melting when you heated it from twenty-five to thirty-one degrees. Your work was not wasted; it is just being stored. All the action happens at thirty-two degrees. . . .habits often appear to make no difference until you cross a critical threshold and unlock a new level of performance . . . When you finally break through the Plateau of Latent Potential, people will call it an overnight success.”
Ok. 1) I loved the bit about focusing on identity-oriented change, as opposed to results-oriented change to effect the desired behavioral change; & how your habits / choices / microactions are how you embody your identity.
2) “Meaningful change does not require radical change” & systems-oriented, rather than goals-oriented processes. I have been thinking a LOT about the whole concept of “pulling on your thread” over the past few years & the helpful bits of this book were all about being able to put some very good, communicable language to that idea.
3) Charts, Worksheets, Exercises, & Activities. I also really enjoyed how much of the techniques suggested in the book affirmed a lot of what I have been learning in therapy & from other experts—particularly ones whose focus is on living as a neurodivergent individual—& how the other half of the book was basically taking these concepts, organizing them into literal charts with very easy-to-comprehend language. I just love a good chart, infographic, or worksheet… 🤓📑
“Your habits shape your identity, and your identity shapes your habits—it’s important to let your values, principles, and identity drive the loop rather than your results. . . True behavior change is identity change.”
PHILOSOPHY—I mean it’s really dated (even shockingly so for a book published in 2018). Although I don’t read a whole lot of “popular” literature, especially written by abled white cishetero men, so maybe this is my own naïve perception of the current zeitgeist… 😅 & again, the casual discussion of the animal lab-testing & experimenting on children was prettyyy fucking gruesome… & don’t even get me started on the beginning of Chapter 15. Big yikes.
Honestly if you’re at all curious about this book I would recommend just borrowing the audiobook from your library (I listened to it on my daily walks) & checking out the material he has on his website (if you can get past all the awful gimmicky stuff) because all the graphs & charts & stuff is there & that’s kind of all you need. But remember, big grain of salt with a lot of his claims & definitely adjust your expectations going in. He is 100% working from a very narrow, i.e. not universal at all, paradigm.
BONUS ELEMENT/S—I will say that this is one of the good—if somewhat scary/sad/frustrating 😅—things about bookclubs is that it gets me to read books that I would never consider picking up on my own. It’s definitely good to get a little taste of everything that’s out there… even if it makes me a little nervous about the kinds of lives folks are living & beliefs folks are having out there… 😵💫
[I’m sorry but I’m still shaking my head over the beginning of Chapter 15. Smgdh. That… that part was hard to read. The TL;DR version is that apparently the solution for the spread of disease due to the unsanitary living conditions as a result of poverty in the overcrowded & “underserviced” (here meaning: displaced & exploited) cities in colonized countries is to give them all free ~fAnCy SoAp~ (Proctor & Gamble “Safeguard”, in fact) so that folks would find hand-washing “satisfying” & therefore maintain it as a habit & in so doing solve the epidemic of diseases caused by intentionally & strategically obstructed access to healthy food, fresh air, & appropriate living spaces. … Fucking SOAP???]
Final note: Anywayyy… the reason I’m giving this book three stars as opposed to two (which is the highest I usually give to problematic books) is because it does accomplish what it sets out to accomplish & I found that information useful even if its presentation & language & worldview was enormously offensive, & because I actually do think that when the author’s voice was allowed(?) to break through, I felt a little humanity in there so… hey, we all contain multitudes, right? 😵💫
“All big things come from small beginnings. The seed of every habit is a single, tiny decision… The task of breaking a bad habit is like uprooting a powerful oak within us. And the task of building a good habit is like cultivating a delicate flower one day at a time.”
★ ★ ★
CW // fatphobia, ableism (ciscognitive normativity, disability erasure), animal abuse & death (lab-testing), child abuse (test subjects for their psychiatrist parents!?), eugenics, queer erasure
Season: Spring, or whenever your “New Year” is
Music pairing: I actually enjoyed having sports on in the background while reading this book (WNBA, US Open, & College Football were all in season during this read). Kind of helped me get in the brain space to actually appreciate something in this book in the end.
Further Reading—
- UNMASKING AUTISM: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity, by Devon Price (2022) ★ ★ ★ ★ ★—highly recommend this as a prerequisite read for everyone as it will give you the context you need to think critically about much of what Clear writes
- LAZINESS DOES NOT EXIST by Devon Price—TBR
- UNWELL WOMEN: Misdiagnosis and Myth in a Man-Made World, by Elinor Cleghorn (2021) ★ ★ ★ ★ ★—for context re: how systemic misogyny disadvantages women (focus: UK & US) & their capacity for self-care & identity-embodiment beyond sociocultural expectations
- DECOLONIZING THERAPY: Oppression, Historical Trauma, and Politicizing Your Practice, by Jennifer Mullan—context re: psychiatry & psychology beyond the DSM & MIC models
- ORGANIZING SOLUTIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH ADHD by Susan Pinsky—TBR
- GRIP: The Art of Working Smart (and Getting to What Matters Most), by Rick Pastoor—TBR (our next bookclub pick for the club that read Atomic Habits so… wish me luck 🤞🏻😅)
- HOW TO KEEP HOUSE WHILE DROWNING: A Gentle Approach to Cleaning and Organizing, by KC Davis—TBR
- HOW TO DO NOTHING: Resisting the Attention Economy, by Jenny Odell—TBR
- THE COURAGE TO BE DISLIKED: The Japanese Phenomenon That Shows You How to Change Your Life and Achieve Real Happiness, by Ichiro Kishimi & Fumitake Koga—TBR
- TWO OLD WOMEN: An Alaska Legend of Betrayal, Courage and Survival, by Velma Wallis—TBR—context re: Clear’s statement: “Becoming separated from the tribe—or worse, being cast out—was a death sentence. “The lone wolf dies, but the pack survives.””
- ON WRITING: A Memoir of the Craft, by Stephen King (2000) ★ ★ ★ ★—these two authors have similar origin stories & King’s books is basically this book but about writing / being a writer, philosophical angle & everything
Check out my review on StopAndSmellTheBooks.com for a list of my favorite quotes.
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Fatphobia, and Medical trauma
Moderate: Ableism
sofilart's review against another edition
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
3.5
First off, I listened to the audiobook version and, even though I've read there are graphs and tables, explanations were extremely clear and straight-forward. The examples really helped. I had no trouble following Clear's ideas.
If I'm being honest, Clear doesn't say anything new or revolutionary. I already did many of the things he recommends. However, I think the value in this book is the compilation, identification and clasification of these common practices and ideas in key principles and strategies. This allows for a more comprehensive and conscious approach to habits.
Important trigger warning: Many examples are centered around dieting. This kinda sucked tbh.
If I'm being honest, Clear doesn't say anything new or revolutionary. I already did many of the things he recommends. However, I think the value in this book is the compilation, identification and clasification of these common practices and ideas in key principles and strategies. This allows for a more comprehensive and conscious approach to habits.
Important trigger warning: Many examples are centered around dieting. This kinda sucked tbh.
Graphic: Eating disorder and Fatphobia
allthingsnerdy's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
fast-paced
4.0
I would recommend the content of this book; I learned a lot about creating habits and have already starting implementing some things in my life! I think it was fairly repetitive though, so I don't think it really needed to be as long as it was. There was also a lot of examples about losing weight as a goal habit to achieve, which I am not a big fan of. But I think overall you could probably get the same information by reading James Clear's website and newsletters.
Minor: Fatphobia
naddl0r's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
2.0
Realized throughout this book mostly two things:
1. I already knew all of it because
2. society is fatphobic (so is this book)
Also I might be too neurodivergent for this.
1. I already knew all of it because
2. society is fatphobic (so is this book)
Also I might be too neurodivergent for this.
Graphic: Fatphobia
citrusmoths's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
2.75
The ideas discussed in this book are useful, and the clarity with which Clear (hah) discusses them makes them simple and straightforward to implement. I do appreciate the emphasis on simplifying the process of adding and building on positive habits.
However, Clear has a tendency to be repetitive, creating a text replete with clichés. I often found myself skimming over the fluff to get to the substance of what was being said. I suspect several pages could have been shaved off had his approach been leaner and more to the point.
And on the subject of repetitiveness, the most damning aspect of this text lies in the fatphobia woven throughout. The prevalence of weight loss as a stock example of a desirable goal is jarring. It doesn't need to be there, and Clear contradicts himself by using it. The chapter on habit tracking ends with Clear stating that you should not focus solely on the number on the scale. Yet all throughout the book, Clear speaks about health and fitness primarily in terms of weight; the book itself focuses on the number on the scale. I would not be the first nor the last to point out how this rhetoric is harmful, and conducive to unhealthy behavior. I would be a poor friend to recommend this to anyone with a history of disordered eating or exercise patterns.
It's a shame, really. The core ideas are valuable, and I hesitate to throw the baby out with the bath water. All the same, I cannot recommend this book without caveats.
However, Clear has a tendency to be repetitive, creating a text replete with clichés. I often found myself skimming over the fluff to get to the substance of what was being said. I suspect several pages could have been shaved off had his approach been leaner and more to the point.
And on the subject of repetitiveness, the most damning aspect of this text lies in the fatphobia woven throughout. The prevalence of weight loss as a stock example of a desirable goal is jarring. It doesn't need to be there, and Clear contradicts himself by using it. The chapter on habit tracking ends with Clear stating that you should not focus solely on the number on the scale. Yet all throughout the book, Clear speaks about health and fitness primarily in terms of weight; the book itself focuses on the number on the scale. I would not be the first nor the last to point out how this rhetoric is harmful, and conducive to unhealthy behavior. I would be a poor friend to recommend this to anyone with a history of disordered eating or exercise patterns.
It's a shame, really. The core ideas are valuable, and I hesitate to throw the baby out with the bath water. All the same, I cannot recommend this book without caveats.
Graphic: Fatphobia
ckcombsdotcom's review against another edition
challenging
informative
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced
4.5
Moderate: Body shaming and Fatphobia
devhens's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
Minor: Addiction and Fatphobia
ash_tree57's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
1.25
So I think there were nuggets of good advice? Yes. Do I think they were overshadowed by the immense amount of neurotypical leaning advice and breakdowns? Yes. Am I saying no neurodivergent person can get anything out of it? Absolutely not. My husband (also ND) has loved it so far and finds it all easy to implement. This is also someone who would eat the same 5-6 meals (and I may be overstating the choices) every single day. He doesn't have problems setting up habits and routines, that's his specialty. Heck, it's practically his love language as he helps me develop habits. I, on the other hand, am not my husband. I need a lot of help because if it's not directly on my mind at that very moment it's dead to me and my brain. And the advice given didn't really talk about the nitty gritty of how to work with that. Sure, he talked about habit stacking. If you're like me, don't expect it to be a cure all. I have my meds in my bathroom for when I get ready, yet in the time it takes me to brush my teeth, I will forget there was more to do. The most grievous piece of advice for my ADHD brain though was "you'll never achieve mastery until you learn to fall in love with boredom" with exactly ZERO advice on how to do that. I left this book feeling ashamed of my ND brain and discouraged about my ability to develop better habits. But honestly, this book is just not designed for, at least, my ADHD brain. ND folks be warned.
Moderate: Ableism and Fatphobia
There are many examples of dieting and losing weight as proof of habits "working". Please be forewarned if this is triggering. I also said ableism because he kept reiterating how easy everything was and how this is *the* method. Which kind of implies if you can't do it, as I can't as an ND individual and guess many others would struggle with, what's wrong with you?greencalcite's review against another edition
informative
medium-paced
3.0
Is there a self help book on habits that’s not anti-fat? I’ll check out his templates, still.
Moderate: Fatphobia