Reviews tagging 'Drug use'

The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz

13 reviews

liv_smiithh's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

the first anthony horowitz i’ve ever read and honestly can say that i was compelled by it. being the first murder mystery i have read in a good while i forgot my love of the genre and this was an amazing book to get back into it. horowitz own reflection of wat sons narrative is similar to that of conan doyle’s yet has a fresher take that is darker and yet still just as tense.
the way it all wraps up neatly at the end is amazing as mid way through you are confused as to how this case has taken a second road and where they interconnect. a good moody autumn read

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

itsheyfay's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

acacia_happy_hour's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zuai's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rachreads97's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rcarri264's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fatherofmysteries's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Captures the feel of Holmes, true to the characters, but with the darker, hidden side at the forefront. Not afraid to rip off the bandaid.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dorhastings's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

I read many a Sherlock Holmes story years ago, and I've read three of Anthony Horowitz's "Hawthorne and Horowitz Mysteries", so that was my setup for this particular novel. Given that I have, in general, appreciated both collections, I was in a good mood and fair preparation for this book.

It's sort of stunning to me that I didn't think of Holmes and Watson as I was reading the Hawthorne and Horowitz Mysteries. I know it's not an uncommon pattern (to have a detective or private investigator and a layperson), but I felt the connection quite a lot in Horowitz's own pair (and interesting to think that Horowitz got the family of Arthur Conan Doyle's blessing prior to publishing his first Hawthorne and Horowitz Mystery). Hawthorne and Horowitz, as a dynamic, is actually my least favorite aspect of those books, and I was grateful to not see too much of the "aww that's cute that you can't see these things that are super obvious to me" dynamic (though of course there was some).

The idea behind this book is pretty unique, I think. Watson is near the end of his life, and he's already published a good lot of Sherlock Holmes episodes. He is revisiting an old case (it doesn't appear to be one of Holmes's last cases, but in it, he is already well-established as a famous private detective) that is darker and more gruesome than the others, such that Watson intends to have it published well after his own death (and Sherlock Holmes is already dead). This is indeed a pretty dark book when you get to the ending, with some hints of it earlier on that I don't remember from the original set (but then, that's how it was). So if you're expecting another run-of-the-mill Sherlock Holmes books, just be aware that there will be some dark and sensitive content.

I like that one mystery starts, but another takes up most of the entirety of the book. Horowitz is always particularly good at making sure every plotline gets wrapped up in the end, and the case is no different from this book. If you're paying attention (and I've given up on doing this most of the time), the first mystery doesn't really feel "solved" when we move on to the next case, and it's addressed super concisely in the last chapter.

I did enjoy the read; in fact, I read most of it in a day of travel, and normally I'm not really in the mood to read much when I'm going from plane to layover to next plane. I was jamming through the short epilogue as my last plane was descending (I had to finish!). I'm glad I read the book, and I will likely read at least the other book, Moriarty. There is probably more Watson in Horowitz's books than in the original mysteries by Conan Doyle, likely because the focus was always meant to be on Sherlock Holmes, so I'm glad that Horowitz is including Watson a little more. He's slightly less bumbling than Horowitz is in the Hawthorne and Horowitz Mysteries (I cannot stand Horowitz in the series).

Now, it's been a minute since I've read Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories, but I don't know if the original Sherlock would, for example, be so upset that he inadvertently put a child in danger that he would then burn down the old school of the House of Silk (SILC?), but perhaps that's not the point. This isn't exactly Conan Doyle's Sherlock, and maybe he shouldn't be. I can certainly see that he might be so bothered by something that he could not function without resolving the situation. So I feel a bit weird about that, but I also like that Horowitz is writing his own Sherlock that bears obvious resemblance to the original.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rebekka_evie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

As Doctor Watson lays in his hospital room, in his old age, he reflects on his life. And he wants to write down one last Sherlock Holmes case. The case of the House of Silk.
Which are actually two cases. I found it great how Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson were woven into these two cases at once. Both curious and captivating. Old characters were brought back to life and got to investigate again.
The language used by Anthony Horowitz was appropriat and at the same time easy to read. He approached the project with respect towards the old stories and Doyle. Sherlock Holmes wasn't re-invented, merly brought back for another case or two.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ghouligan's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings